Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

[BulldogBelle]

Eagleton, West and Murphy are all on report this week -


Murphy - Forceful contact on Raines in the Second Quarter ( this should be thrown right out the door doesn't look like much)

West - For wrestling with King in the last quarter ( this will probably cop him a fine )

Eagleton - For tripping Deledio ( this one, I am worried about )

[bulldogtragic]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Some BF posters say they've seen the Eagleton incident slow-mo and it looks bad.

But if he's done it, he's done it and we'll move on.

[The Coon Dog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Some BF posters say they've seen the Eagleton incident slow-mo and it looks bad.

But if he's done it, he's done it and we'll move on.

The best way to describe it is just imagine Eagle is Dustin Fletcher & an opposition player is about to go past him & before he knows it his leg has come out, purely a reflex action with no malicious intent.

Probably on points he'll go over a hundred & draw a week, but with good behaviour & an early guilty plea he'll fall under the hundred & escape a penalty.

[alwaysadog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

The best way to describe it is just imagine Eagle is Dustin Fletcher & an opposition player is about to go past him & before he knows it his leg has come out, purely a reflex action with no malicious intent.

Probably on points he'll go over a hundred & draw a week, but with good behaviour & an early guilty plea he'll fall under the hundred & escape a penalty.

I hope you're right about Eagle TCD.

Can anyone tell me if West has ever been reported or suspended, I can't recall any examples?

The worst Murph can get is a reprimand, they surely can't be wanting players to pull out of contests for the loose ball, unless they have forewarning of contact with a player's head. It was courageous rather than reckless IMHO.

[Bornadog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

There were two trips of West by Richmond players, were they reported?

[GVGjr]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Worst case scenario is that these guys all miss a week. Who would replace them?
Aker, Monty and Faulkner?

[alwaysadog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Worst case scenario is that these guys all miss a week. Who would replace them?
Aker, Monty and Faulkner?

What's the prognosis on Power; suddenly everyone has forgotten how good he has been in building on his efforts late last year... and if Bobby is missing he has shown he can fill that void.

As irreplaceable as Westie is why wouldn't Crossie come back in? How badly hurt is he?

Aker plays a different role to Eagle but they could be swapped and others given Eagles run and carry role.

Power, Cross and Aker for me.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

There were two trips of West by Richmond players, were they reported?

One was by the hands. Shouldn't go for that. Didn't see the other.
Eagleton lashed out with his leg

[Go_Dogs]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Murph's incident seems reasonably similar to Bassett's. I think he should get off. Eagle will be in trouble though, could possibly go for a match, although I don't think the attempted trip was really all that bad.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Murph's incident seems reasonably similar to Bassett's. I think he should get off. Eagle will be in trouble though, could possibly go for a match, although I don't think the attempted trip was really all that bad.

Thats they way I read it to. Eagleton is the most likely to be given a spell.

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Murph's incident seems reasonably similar to Bassett's. I think he should get off. Eagle will be in trouble though, could possibly go for a match, although I don't think the attempted trip was really all that bad.

Murphy's was about as different to Bassett's as you could imagine. Not relevant at all.

No chance he will go, I'm surprised it hasn't been withdrawn already.

[Go_Dogs]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Murphy's was about as different to Bassett's as you could imagine. Not relevant at all.

No chance he will go, I'm surprised it hasn't been withdrawn already.

Not as far as how the incident occurred, but the same ruling would be used to see that Murph doesn't get penalised. ie. eyes for the ball, not the player. Even if he had seen the player, what chance did he have to pull up? Did he try to minimise contact once he was aware etc.

I'm aware Bassett's was an attempted smother, but it's basically the same thing IMO, and the same principles should be applied.

[Bornadog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

One was by the hands. Shouldn't go for that. Didn't see the other.
Eagleton lashed out with his leg

The second one was similiar, right on the final siren and the free was not taken by Westy. Does it make a difference if you trip by hand. Once upon a time a trip was regarded as almost the worst thing you could do an a football field. Jimmy Krakeour got 5 weeks for tripping.

[Missing Dog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Don't have the full details, but there was no suspensions, only fines and reprimands

[Bornadog]

Re: Eagleton, Murphy & West - Reported

Reports:

West - can accept $900 fine
Eagleton, can accept a reprimand and 45 points
Murphy - Thrown out, no case to answer.