If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

[bulldogtragic]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Lake, First and Second pick to Hawks.

Roughead, Hawks first pick to Dogs.

Hawks first pick & Hill/Everitt to Eagles for Brown.

Do-able?

My Pelchan sensors are tingling... So, take out Roughead and insert Boyle, and take out their first rounder and add in an old pair of Dermie's socks or some of Dunstall's pubes stuck to a bar of soap (but not both), and we're close to Pelchan's final offer.

I hope we don't trade with the knob-jockey.

[comrade]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Lake, First and Second pick to Hawks.

Roughead, Hawks first pick to Dogs.

Hawks first pick & Hill/Everitt to Eagles for Brown.

Do-able?

Nice one.

Would hate to lose Hill, but could live with Everitt moving on.

That would leave us with our first pick in the draft being around the 40-45 mark, but we’d have a great young KPD and a superstar KPF.

Absolute pipe dream, but that would definitely be a win for us (and therefore won’t happen).

[Happy Days]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

My Pelchan sensors are tingling... So, take out Roughead and insert Boyle, and take out their first rounder and add in an old pair of Dermie's socks or some of Dunstall's pubes stuck to a bar of soap, and we're close to Pelchan's final offer.

I hope we don't trade with the knob-jockey.

This is true, and it's a speculative offer to any club, but the Hawks reallllllllllly need a backman.

I don't think Brown is up for sale anyway.

[Dry Rot]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

some of Dunstall's pubes stuck to a bar of soap (

Hey, I just had a late lunch before reading this!

[Dry Rot]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Lake, First and Second pick to Hawks.

Roughead, Hawks first pick to Dogs.

Hawks first pick & Hill/Everitt to Eagles for Brown.

Do-able?

Interesting but can't see either KPP leaving WCE and Hawks.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Interesting but can't see either KPP leaving WCE and Hawks.

Exactly. I think in all seriousness Sydeny is the front runner, if $550,000 a year x 5 years is even near true, Brian would be crazy not to consider it.

So if we're talking dealing with Sydney:

We want pick 7, 25 and Hall.
For Lake and pick 35.

Then we have two years of Hall, and #7 kid. I say look at trading pick 17 and 25 for a mature KPP backman and a mature outside player. Perhaps the combo of a mature defender and a runner from a club that needs to rebuild. Perhaps something SIMILAR TO 'Thurstans and Salopek' or 'A tall north defender and Danny Wells' (Not specifically those players, but you see what i mean, a tall back and runing player - names for illustration purposes only).

[Topdog]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

that they would be willing be to trade[/B] that I think we'd want.

Roughead would be nice, but I can't see that happening.

The Roughnut is out of contract too.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

The Roughnut is out of contract too.

Hawks don't look anywhere near as dangerous without the other twin tower. No way Pelchan is trading him off, no matter the need of a FB.

[LostDoggy]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Lake, First and Second pick to Hawks.

Roughead, Hawks first pick to Dogs.

Hawks first pick & Hill/Everitt to Eagles for Brown.

Do-able?

Would not trade Hill.

Just my opinion, but we are yet to see the very very best of him.

[Dry Rot]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

The Roughnut is out of contract too.

Hawks don't look anywhere near as dangerous without the other twin tower. No way Pelchan is trading him off, no matter the need of a FB.

What he said. The Hawks are pricks to trade with.

[Dry Rot]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Exactly. I think in all seriousness Sydeny is the front runner, if $550,000 a year x 5 years is even near true, Brian would be crazy not to consider it.

So if we're talking dealing with Sydney:

We want pick 7, 25 and Hall.
For Lake and pick 35.

Then we have two years of Hall, and #7 kid. I say look at trading pick 17 and 25 for a mature KPP backman and a mature outside player. Perhaps the combo of a mature defender and a runner from a club that needs to rebuild. Perhaps something SIMILAR TO 'Thurstans and Salopek' or 'A tall north defender and Danny Wells' (Not specifically those players, but you see what i mean, a tall back and runing player - names for illustration purposes only).

If we did the above, what would it take to get Brown from WCE? Pick 7 and 25 for Brown and their third rounder? Would we be paying way over the odds?

[Topdog]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Hawks don't look anywhere near as dangerous without the other twin tower. No way Pelchan is trading him off, no matter the need of a FB.

And if he says he wants to leave?

[mighty_west]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Would not trade Hill.

Just my opinion, but we are yet to see the very very best of him.

Agree, i'd trade Everitt way before Joshy Hill, he's going to be something special.

[GVGjr]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

Whilst nobody wants him to leave, a player and a first round draft pick is about the best we could hope for.
Just remember the more players involved the more likely that it will be screwed up at the last minute with one of them having second thoughts.

[anfo27]

Re: If Lake leaves what would be adequate compensation?

What about Jess White from the swans? Big boy who can take a mark & has pace, but can't see the swans trading him