Re: Negativity On The Club. A good thing?
But we knew what we were getting into. It's almost like we didn't know what it really meant to have a larger-than-life psycho motormouth mega-ego superstar because we've never had one before. I tell you what, Premiership teams (other than maybe Geelong) are full of these idiots, because they can play.
Okay, Aker is gone, and at the end there he wasn't the same player, no worries, no regrets, but does this mean that our experiment with genuine, bona-fide, crazy-ass superstars is over? I ask again: we took Aker coming over as a sign that we were now a genuine contender. Does the fact that we patently and miserably failed to get the best out of him and let it end this way mean then that we were actually not a genuine contender at all, and that we were playing out of our league? Are damaged superstars (both Aker and Bazza) all we can hope for in the future, and even then, no guarantees?
There are no winners out of this sorry saga.
But we knew what we were getting into. It's almost like we didn't know what it really meant to have a larger-than-life psycho motormouth mega-ego superstar because we've never had one before. I tell you what, Premiership teams (other than maybe Geelong) are full of these idiots, because they can play.
Okay, Aker is gone, and at the end there he wasn't the same player, no worries, no regrets, but does this mean that our experiment with genuine, bona-fide, crazy-ass superstars is over? I ask again: we took Aker coming over as a sign that we were now a genuine contender. Does the fact that we patently and miserably failed to get the best out of him and let it end this way mean then that we were actually not a genuine contender at all, and that we were playing out of our league? Are damaged superstars (both Aker and Bazza) all we can hope for in the future, and even then, no guarantees?
There are no winners out of this sorry saga.
Comment