Round 17 Teams:

[comrade]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Good reward for Moles - I thought he was impressive in the greasy conditions last week. He's a bit like a right footed Eagle the way he swings around on his preferred side.

Hasleby injured or omitted?

[Missing Dog]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Hasleby injured or omitted?

General soreness

[Hotdog60]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Good reward for Moles - I thought he was impressive in the greasy conditions last week. He's a bit like a right footed Eagle the way he swings around on his preferred side.

Hasleby injured or omitted?

Hasleby was general soreness I think.

[chef]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Final Teams

In Roughhead, Hall
Out Everitt, Eagleton

In Suban, Pearce, Crichton, Grover
Out Hasleby, Bradley, Crowley, Silvagni

Happy with that

[Missing-Dog]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Not happy with the fact that Everitt is out.

[choconmientay]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Final Teams

In Roughhead, Hall
Out Everitt, Eagleton

I think the MC got it right this week I am happy for Moles to retain his spot. One good thing with Aker departure is that we have a spot available to develop our young players

[GVGjr]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Not happy with the fact that Everitt is out.

Who's spot should he have taken?

[azabob]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Not happy with the fact that Everitt is out.

Who would you drop?

[G-Mo77]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

I really didn't think Everitt played that well, I know a lot of people are upset about him being dropped but I just didn't see much in his game last Saturday. Maybe if we were playing a team without a mountain like Sandliands he may have been selected.

I thought Moles was really good though and glad to see him hold his spot.

[Rocco Jones]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

I really didn't think Everitt played that well, I know a lot of people are upset about him being dropped but I just didn't see much in his game last Saturday. Maybe if we were playing a team without a mountain like Sandliands he may have been selected.

I thought Moles was really good though and glad to see him hold his spot.

I like and want him in the 22 but I totally understand why he isn't playing this week.

I rate Dre higher than Moles but it's not about picking your 22 best players, it's about picking your best 22 to run out there together.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Disappointed that Everitt wasn't given more than a game to prove himself. As for who should have made way for him, dunno - just disappointed for Everitt.

[comrade]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Coming back from Darwin, we would have been way to top heavy if Everitt played instead of Moles.

To go all the way, we need to run.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Coming back from Darwin, we would have been way to top heavy if Everitt played instead of Moles.

To go all the way, we need to run.

fair enough

[LostDoggy]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

I like and want him in the 22 but I totally understand why he isn't playing this week.

I rate Dre higher than Moles but it's not about picking your 22 best players, it's about picking your best 22 to run out there together.

What he said.

I want Dre in our team but it was either him or Williams/Roughy and I thought Williams was better last week and a true ruck is needed against Sandilands to help Huddo.

Is Will playing at Willy this week? Any chance of a break for Huddo next game against the Roos?

[The Bulldogs Bite]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Coming back from Darwin, we would have been way to top heavy if Everitt played instead of Moles.

To go all the way, we need to run.

Agreed.

Makes our 'best' 22 for the finals interesting. Will Moles jump ahead of Everitt and Hahn for this reason, or will we revert back to a set-up we are familiar with? Will Hill (if he improves) leap frog all three?

Obviously it comes down to form, but I wonder what the MC would prefer if all options were available.