Round 17 Teams:

[comrade]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

Agreed.

Makes our 'best' 22 for the finals interesting. Will Moles jump ahead of Everitt and Hahn for this reason, or will we revert back to a set-up we are familiar with? Will Hill (if he improves) leap frog all three?

Obviously it comes down to form, but I wonder what the MC would prefer if all options were available.

Mitch should be no where near our team come finals.

The last spot should come out of the following: Everitt, Moles, Eagleton and Hill. I'm leaning towards a runner, so it's either Moles or Eagleton. Brodie has a golden opportunity to secure his spot over the next 6 weeks.

[BulldogBelle]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

I don't think dropping two runners for a ruckman and a KP forward would be a good idea, especially coming off a trip to Darwin.

I rate Dre ahead of Moles and Eagle but here's your best 22 and then there's your best 22 to run out there.

The reply to this of course is the Japanese 'Mu' or Chinese 'Wu'. There is no word for it in English. Your argument is based upon a false premise and therefore can't be answered, The false premise being that the mix for Darwin was ideal and it is suited to this week.

Nice trick Rocco.

[Twodogs]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

The reply to this of course is the Japanese 'Mu' or Chinese 'Wu'. There is no word for it in English. Your argument is based upon a false premise and therefore can't be answered, The false premise being that the mix for Darwin was ideal and it is suited to this week.

Fair dinkum JC. Your's are the only posts I have to read with Dictionary.com and Wiki open in seperate windows to cross reference with.

[Ghost Dog]

Re: Round 17 Teams:

The reply to this of course is the Japanese 'Mu' or Chinese 'Wu'. There is no word for it in English. Your argument is based upon a false premise and therefore can't be answered, The false premise being that the mix for Darwin was ideal and it is suited to this week.

Nice trick Rocco.

If it were truly 'Mu' then your reply would contain a dignified blank space. Instead you have a counter argument!