TEAMS - Round 22

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LostDoggy
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 8307

    #16
    Re: TEAMS - Round 22

    Originally posted by chef
    Trade bait.
    I would have thought Cordy is at-least two years away from a second Ruck. So who would back up next year for Hudson and Roughead if we trade him. We should know by the end of next year whether Cordy can play at the higher level then we can look at trading.

    Comment

    • LostDoggy
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 8307

      #17
      Re: TEAMS - Round 22

      Originally posted by bornadog
      When Hudson goes it will be Minno and Roughie
      That's the way i was looking at it, although i think Huddo has a while to go yet.

      Comment

      • chef
        Hall of Fame
        • Nov 2008
        • 14584

        #18
        Re: TEAMS - Round 22

        Originally posted by bornadog
        When Hudson goes it will be Minno and Roughie
        If Huddo goes on for another two seasons It could be Roughead and Cordy.
        The curse is dead.

        Comment

        • chef
          Hall of Fame
          • Nov 2008
          • 14584

          #19
          Re: TEAMS - Round 22

          Originally posted by Asylum Ward
          I would have thought Cordy is at-least two years away from a second Ruck. So who would back up next year for Hudson and Roughead if we trade him. We should know by the end of next year whether Cordy can play at the higher level then we can look at trading.
          I agree, I would rather keep him but if he sees himself dropping down to third in line with Cordy also in the wings it could be him and not the club wanting a trade.
          The curse is dead.

          Comment

          • GVGjr
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 44380

            #20
            Re: TEAMS - Round 22

            Originally posted by comrade
            The one guy giving us the most defensive pressure in our forward 50 - whilst still kicking goals?

            Hahn had to go because Everitt can now give a chop out defensively. If the MC think Mitch is a better option to swing back, they must have forgotten his horrible performance against Leigh Brown.
            You're right but it still would have been a decision between Jones and Hahn for me
            Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

            Comment

            • Twodogs
              Moderator
              • Nov 2006
              • 27654

              #21
              Re: TEAMS - Round 22

              Originally posted by GVGjr
              You're right but it still would have been a decision between Jones and Hahn for me

              If only every decision was as easy as that one.
              They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

              Comment

              • LostDoggy
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 8307

                #22
                Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                Originally posted by chef
                If Huddo goes on for another two seasons It could be Roughead and Cordy.

                Originally posted by chef
                I agree, I would rather keep him but if he sees himself dropping down to third in line with Cordy also in the wings it could be him and not the club wanting a trade.

                Agree - Cordy in a year or two will overtake Minson based on Wills current form line. That said I think there is room for 3 ruckmen on the list - whether it gets to the point though that Will is permanently in the 2's only time will tell - if this is the case you would expect him to be looking elsewhere.

                Comment

                • Go_Dogs
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 10117

                  #23
                  Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                  Originally posted by 4by2
                  Agree - Cordy in a year or two will overtake Minson based on Wills current form line. That said I think there is room for 3 ruckmen on the list - whether it gets to the point though that Will is permanently in the 2's only time will tell - if this is the case you would expect him to be looking elsewhere.
                  No disrespect to Ayce, but what is his current form line? He hasn't been able to string together any games at all over his first 2 years, and it's likely it'll be another couple at least before he can.

                  I certainly still think Minson offers quite a bit, and I don't see why we wouldn't keep all three (Hudson, Roughie and Minson)
                  Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?

                  Comment

                  • The Bulldogs Bite
                    Hall of Fame
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 11123

                    #24
                    Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                    Originally posted by Griffen#16
                    No disrespect to Ayce, but what is his current form line? He hasn't been able to string together any games at all over his first 2 years, and it's likely it'll be another couple at least before he can.

                    I certainly still think Minson offers quite a bit, and I don't see why we wouldn't keep all three (Hudson, Roughie and Minson)
                    Our supporters get carried away with Ayce. Reality is, he's done nothing even when he's been on the park. I made the comment at our intra club game this year that people were praising Cordy and slamming Grant. Cordy had maybe 2 possessions.

                    He's extremely raw and he'll take another 2 or 3 years before we see much of him IMO.

                    Minson still has a spot on the list, possibly even in the 22. He did have an interrupted pre-season after all.
                    W00F!

                    Comment

                    • LostDoggy
                      WOOF Member
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 8307

                      #25
                      Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                      Originally posted by Greystache
                      Not a big problem against Essendon who are actually quite a slow team despite their media image, but we need to work on our defensive structures in preparation for Collingwood next week.
                      They looked very quick against us last time we played them. If there is one thing I would like to see this weekend is some pressure in our inside 50 - nonexistent last time

                      Comment

                      • Mofra
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 14874

                        #26
                        Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                        I saw enough last year to suggest to me that Ayce will be a good player for us, but that was more to do with workrate & running ability as a forward (and some crumbing efforts). Jones wasn't playing then (and has overtaken him) and Grant has certainly overtaken him.

                        I wouldn't want to bank on Cordy being right in two years' time, considering he has the same build of a young Warnock and he's taken longer to establish himself. Will is a no 1 bash & crash ruck and will take over from Hudson when he retires, as well as filling in over the next two years considering Hudson will probably be rested here and there - and as we've seen with Johnno, Aker & West, when an older player starts to decline it's more like hitting a cliff than a gentle slope.
                        Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                        Comment

                        • The Bulldogs Bite
                          Hall of Fame
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 11123

                          #27
                          Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                          In regards to the side we're fielding, surely we can't carry all of Grant, Jones, Hahn and Everitt to the finals?

                          Grant and Everitt should be a lock.

                          Jones applies plenty of defensive pressure - should get the nod.

                          It leaves Hahn in the dark, obviously, but who should replace him? Is it worth playing somebody like Stack despite his cruel flaws of intensity? At least he's quick - puts him ahead of Mitch.
                          W00F!

                          Comment

                          • stefoid
                            Senior Player
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 1846

                            #28
                            Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                            Originally posted by elephant_man
                            They looked very quick against us last time we played them. If there is one thing I would like to see this weekend is some pressure in our inside 50 - nonexistent last time
                            Essendon play quick, regardless of their legs peed. If you dont force them to turn it over they will kill you - like they did to us last time. Not a team to get lazy against. On the other hand, if you pressure them they fold like a 3 legged card table.

                            Cordy is hyper thin and delicate (loose joints, shoulder recos, etc...). Long term he seems to me to be a forward and punch hit ruck. It would be madness to trade Minson and leave us one injury away from playing Williams in the ruck.

                            Besides, there is nothing to say that Minson wont improve - he certainly has pressure on his spot for now, so balls in his court. time to sing for your supper Will.

                            edit: I was going to change legs peed to leg speed, but with essendon, I think Ill leave it how I typed it

                            Comment

                            • mjp
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 7313

                              #29
                              Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                              Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
                              It leaves Hahn in the dark, obviously, but who should replace him? Is it worth playing somebody like Stack despite his cruel flaws of intensity? At least he's quick - puts him ahead of Mitch.
                              I am happy to give Mitch Hahn the benefit of the doubt re- last week. It was his first one back in and everyone got beaten. If he is poor again this weekend to me that is the end of it though and he shouldn't play again this year.

                              I wouldn't play Stack under any circumstances. To me he is a marginal state level player, let alone an AFL player. He wont put his head over the ball and fumbles under pressure.

                              Hill has been very poor at times - that I know. I would back him in now though - if there is anyone outside the core group who could provide some legitimate run and goals - proven at AFL level - it is Josh. I think he is STILL our third leading goal-kicker on the season, in only 12 games.

                              Isn't it time to show some faith and back him in?
                              What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

                              Comment

                              • Murphy'sLore
                                WOOF Member
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 2085

                                #30
                                Re: TEAMS - Round 22

                                Originally posted by mjp
                                Hill has been very poor at times - that I know. I would back him in now though - if there is anyone outside the core group who could provide some legitimate run and goals - proven at AFL level - it is Josh. I think he is STILL our third leading goal-kicker on the season, in only 12 games.

                                Isn't it time to show some faith and back him in?
                                ^^^^ This. At the risk of showing my ignorance, isn't the game decided in the end on who kicks the most goals? I understand Hill has many flaws, but he does seem to kick goals, doesn't he?

                                Comment

                                Working...