Our natural enemies? And friends?
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
Straight from the Cold war era comeback book.
Just in case you didn't know the Soviet Union doesn't exist anymore, Russia is democratic and Communism is no longer the countries greatest threat.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
Thanks for the tip.
Actually, Russia is anything but democratic. The former USSR's powerbrokers (read: Communist party officials) basically became the country's capitalist class and the shift in power was sideways and not as democratic as most think. In fact, contemporary Russia is haunted by corruption. Glasnost was pretty monumental, and it shattered the state apparatus that used to control everything - but many Russians now yearn for a return to the days of official and brutal authoritarianism. Some people even think Russians are conditioned to being ruled by an iron fist, though I'm not convinced.Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
The events of October 1917 (heck, even 1905) would suggest the Russian populace (like most peoples) will only tolerate so much before change is forced upon the ruling classes. Unfortunately today the measures of population control are less obvious (read: Friedmanesque) which creates a vacuum of obvious opponents to rally against.
In any case, surely the Chinese would have been a better example? Burmese? Pinochet-era Chileans?Western Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
I would agree ol' chap. However, the 1917 revolution despite being won in the name of the proletariat; was driven by bourgeois intelligentsia who depsite their noble intentions, ended up creating an authoritarian regime. A mere substitution of power from the Tsar to the Bolsheviks was what took place (notwithstanding the short reign of the Provisional Government).The events of October 1917 (heck, even 1905) would suggest the Russian populace (like most peoples) will only tolerate so much before change is forced upon the ruling classes. Unfortunately today the measures of population control are less obvious (read: Friedmanesque) which creates a vacuum of obvious opponents to rally against.
The October revolution actually ran contrary to the Marxist premise of a people's uprising. For that we can thank Lenin and his steadfast belief in the idea of a vanguard party to lead the workers and peasants into a socialist paradise, rather than them leading themselves.Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
Where were you today when I had my History exam?!I would agree ol' chap. However, the 1917 revolution despite being won in the name of the proletariat; was driven by bourgeois intelligentsia who depsite their noble intentions, ended up creating an authoritarian regime. A mere substitution of power from the Tsar to the Bolsheviks was what took place (notwithstanding the short reign of the Provisional Government).
The October revolution actually ran contrary to the Marxist premise of a people's uprising. For that we can thank Lenin and his steadfast belief in the idea of a vanguard party to lead the workers and peasants into a socialist paradise, rather than them leading themselves.Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
Anyways, back to the topic.
Pretty sure in the Footscray History Book it discusses this and points the bone @ Barrassi.
Something about Barassi living in the Dogs zone, and we thought we were a monty to get him, but Melbourne pulled a swifty and stole him from under our noses.Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
Seeing Barassi Snr played for Melbourne and after he died in WWII Barassi was practically taken in by Norm Smith, I'd say we were never a chance in hell of getting him.Anyways, back to the topic.
Pretty sure in the Footscray History Book it discusses this and points the bone @ Barrassi.
Something about Barassi living in the Dogs zone, and we thought we were a monty to get him, but Melbourne pulled a swifty and stole him from under our noses.Comment
-
Re: Our natural enemies? And friends?
Hey man, if Wikipedia says their democratic, then they must be democratic
Actually, Russia is anything but democratic. The former USSR's powerbrokers (read: Communist party officials) basically became the country's capitalist class and the shift in power was sideways and not as democratic as most think. In fact, contemporary Russia is haunted by corruption. Glasnost was pretty monumental, and it shattered the state apparatus that used to control everything - but many Russians now yearn for a return to the days of official and brutal authoritarianism. Some people even think Russians are conditioned to being ruled by an iron fist, though I'm not convinced.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
Comment