comrade's bit:
INTRODUCTION
We’ve been smashed by 100 points. We’ve lost Morris. We’ve lost Cooney. Hutchy says our window has closed. Crawf reckons we can’t win anything for at least 4 years.
Woe is Bulldogs.
Harden up, I say. It’s September.
It would be fair to say that we enter the finals in opposite fashion to our opponents. Collingwood won the minor premiership and have almost a fully healthy list to choose from. We’ve had to deal with injuries to key players, thyroiditis and a fairly public sacking to a fairly public persona in the run home. Not ideal.
But, we’re still top 4!
Does anyone need reminding that the Dogs are still a genuine premiership chance? For all the doom and gloom, we win this game and the Bulldogs are into their third preliminary final in a row, no mean feat in itself in a very even competition.
Last time they met:
Round 11, 2010, Docklands
Collingwood 17.11 113 def. Western Bulldogs 16.7 103
After an insipid loss to the Bombers, the Bulldogs again lacked bite against a quality opponent with defensive pressure almost non-existent for 3 quarters.
By stopping our run from the back line and completely dominating the stoppages, the Pies were able to get out to a 37 point lead at three quarter time.
With the game out of reach, positional changes were made; most notably, Brian was sent forward, changing our attacking structure and forcing the Collingwood defence to more accountable. Winning the ball from the back line and running it through the corridor, we were able to separate the defence and score, bringing the margin back to 10 points at the final siren.
Interesting in that game we had 8 players with under 50 games experience vs Collingwood’s 6. We also had 5 players with 150+ games under their belt vs Collingwood’s 8.
Team Stats
Bulldogs
High Rankings
• Ranked 1st in Kicks Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in Disposals Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in Marks Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in Points Per Game
• Ranked 4th in least Opponent Points Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in least Opponent Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in least Opponent Hitouts Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in Team to Opponent Kicks Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 4th in Team to Opponent Disposals Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 3rd in Team to Opponent Marks Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 3rd in Team to Opponent Points Per Game Diff.
Low Rankings
• Ranked 16th in Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 14th in Hitouts Per Game
Collingwood
High Rankings
• Ranked 4th in Kicks Per Game
• Ranked 4th in Disposals Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in Points Per Game
• Ranked 1st in Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in least Opponent Points Per Game
• Ranked 1st in least Opponent Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 4th in Team to Opponent Kicks Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 2nd in Team to Opponent Points Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 1st in Team to Opponent Tackles Per Game Diff.
Low Rankings
• Ranked 15th in Hitouts Per Game
• Ranked 12th in least Opponent Handballs Per Game
• Ranked 12th in Team to Opponent Hitouts Per Game Diff.
Statistical insight
Both teams play a high possession game, ranking 3rd and 4th in total disposals. Whilst both teams have blue collar midfields that are prepared to do the tough stuff, both teams are also good at restricting opposition tackles.
The major difference is that Collingwood are tackling machines ranking number 1 in the competition. This is in stark contrast to the Bulldogs who lay less tackles than any other team.
If we are to be competitive, you would think our tackle count has to match or exceed Collingwood’s. Allowing them to play an uncontested style would be football suicide.
Our Backline
In both games this year, our run from the back line has been stifled. In games where Collingwood have looked vulnerable this year (Melbourne x2, Geelong for patches, Hawthorn), they have been sliced open with quick, precise kick ins and then penetrated through the corridor.
When their back line doesn’t have time to set up, they’re susceptible one on one.
It starts from the kick in. Holding the ball up against Collingwood is playing into their hands because they set up their defensive structure to force teams wide.
There has been plenty of discussion about our structure and I think that mjp has it spot on. 8 defenders to rotate through the defensive half. This has two benefits:
1. it blocks up the space and doesn’t allow cheats like Davis and Didak to get free goal side
2. it potentially allows us to manipulate match ups so we have 2 of Lake, Gilbee or Murphy free
Key Match Ups
Travis Cloke v Tom Williams
Why is it a key?
Cloke is a talisman. If he plays well and gets involved early, things seem to click in to the place for Collingwood. Stopping him will go a long way to turning this game in to a slog.
Tom has put together a solid season and will be required to have a blinder against Collingwood’s number #1 tall forward.
Similar to Cam Mooney, Cloke leads so high up the field and regularly starts attacking chains on the wing or half back line. Tommy has the athletic capabilities to at least give a contest and needs to ensure Cloke is denied the ball. If he gets his ‘mojo’ going, we will be in for a tough night.
Brian Lake vs no one/Dawes
Why is it a key?
Brian reads the ball better than any other defender (usually). His ability to stop opposition attacks and then set up our own have been missing in our previous two games against the Pies.
Ideally Brian gets to play as the designated loose man and support the likes of Hahn and Shaggy who may be forced to play on bigger opponents. Mick will send Dawes to him and make him accountable – he has a vice like grip and is very strong, but Lake has a chance to peel off. Let’s hope he is switched on.
Harbrow vs Beams
Why is it a key?
Harbrow has been beaten the last two times. His ability to break free and use his pace to set up attacks will be critical in actually scoring on the night.
I like this match up a lot more than Harbrow vs Davis, particularly with Harbrow’s inability to get his shoulders above his head to spoil. Beams plays high and gets into the midfield which I think suits us.
When Beams gets sucked in to ball chasing, it will allow Harbrow to stay on the defensive side and play a clean-up role which he does well (1 hand scoop, blaze away). With his pace and footwork, he will be a key to us breaking the game open and he needs to kick WELL.
Murphy vs Leon Davis
Davis has murdered Harbrow the last 2 times and we need to change it up. I suspect that Macaffer may go to Murphy (or Gilbee) but if we can manipulate this match up at least we know that Murph will contest better in the air.
Leon’s defensive pressure is good, but I’d back Murph as the one guy in our back line that’s smart enough to find the space and use it well. His form heading in to September is superior to the last two year’s.
INTRODUCTION
We’ve been smashed by 100 points. We’ve lost Morris. We’ve lost Cooney. Hutchy says our window has closed. Crawf reckons we can’t win anything for at least 4 years.
Woe is Bulldogs.
Harden up, I say. It’s September.
It would be fair to say that we enter the finals in opposite fashion to our opponents. Collingwood won the minor premiership and have almost a fully healthy list to choose from. We’ve had to deal with injuries to key players, thyroiditis and a fairly public sacking to a fairly public persona in the run home. Not ideal.
But, we’re still top 4!
Does anyone need reminding that the Dogs are still a genuine premiership chance? For all the doom and gloom, we win this game and the Bulldogs are into their third preliminary final in a row, no mean feat in itself in a very even competition.
Last time they met:
Round 11, 2010, Docklands
Collingwood 17.11 113 def. Western Bulldogs 16.7 103
After an insipid loss to the Bombers, the Bulldogs again lacked bite against a quality opponent with defensive pressure almost non-existent for 3 quarters.
By stopping our run from the back line and completely dominating the stoppages, the Pies were able to get out to a 37 point lead at three quarter time.
With the game out of reach, positional changes were made; most notably, Brian was sent forward, changing our attacking structure and forcing the Collingwood defence to more accountable. Winning the ball from the back line and running it through the corridor, we were able to separate the defence and score, bringing the margin back to 10 points at the final siren.
Interesting in that game we had 8 players with under 50 games experience vs Collingwood’s 6. We also had 5 players with 150+ games under their belt vs Collingwood’s 8.
Team Stats
Bulldogs
High Rankings
• Ranked 1st in Kicks Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in Disposals Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in Marks Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in Points Per Game
• Ranked 4th in least Opponent Points Per Game
• Ranked 3rd in least Opponent Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in least Opponent Hitouts Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in Team to Opponent Kicks Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 4th in Team to Opponent Disposals Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 3rd in Team to Opponent Marks Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 3rd in Team to Opponent Points Per Game Diff.
Low Rankings
• Ranked 16th in Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 14th in Hitouts Per Game
Collingwood
High Rankings
• Ranked 4th in Kicks Per Game
• Ranked 4th in Disposals Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in Points Per Game
• Ranked 1st in Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 2nd in least Opponent Points Per Game
• Ranked 1st in least Opponent Tackles Per Game
• Ranked 4th in Team to Opponent Kicks Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 2nd in Team to Opponent Points Per Game Diff.
• Ranked 1st in Team to Opponent Tackles Per Game Diff.
Low Rankings
• Ranked 15th in Hitouts Per Game
• Ranked 12th in least Opponent Handballs Per Game
• Ranked 12th in Team to Opponent Hitouts Per Game Diff.
Statistical insight
Both teams play a high possession game, ranking 3rd and 4th in total disposals. Whilst both teams have blue collar midfields that are prepared to do the tough stuff, both teams are also good at restricting opposition tackles.
The major difference is that Collingwood are tackling machines ranking number 1 in the competition. This is in stark contrast to the Bulldogs who lay less tackles than any other team.
If we are to be competitive, you would think our tackle count has to match or exceed Collingwood’s. Allowing them to play an uncontested style would be football suicide.
Our Backline
In both games this year, our run from the back line has been stifled. In games where Collingwood have looked vulnerable this year (Melbourne x2, Geelong for patches, Hawthorn), they have been sliced open with quick, precise kick ins and then penetrated through the corridor.
When their back line doesn’t have time to set up, they’re susceptible one on one.
It starts from the kick in. Holding the ball up against Collingwood is playing into their hands because they set up their defensive structure to force teams wide.
There has been plenty of discussion about our structure and I think that mjp has it spot on. 8 defenders to rotate through the defensive half. This has two benefits:
1. it blocks up the space and doesn’t allow cheats like Davis and Didak to get free goal side
2. it potentially allows us to manipulate match ups so we have 2 of Lake, Gilbee or Murphy free
Key Match Ups
Travis Cloke v Tom Williams
Why is it a key?
Cloke is a talisman. If he plays well and gets involved early, things seem to click in to the place for Collingwood. Stopping him will go a long way to turning this game in to a slog.
Tom has put together a solid season and will be required to have a blinder against Collingwood’s number #1 tall forward.
Similar to Cam Mooney, Cloke leads so high up the field and regularly starts attacking chains on the wing or half back line. Tommy has the athletic capabilities to at least give a contest and needs to ensure Cloke is denied the ball. If he gets his ‘mojo’ going, we will be in for a tough night.
Brian Lake vs no one/Dawes
Why is it a key?
Brian reads the ball better than any other defender (usually). His ability to stop opposition attacks and then set up our own have been missing in our previous two games against the Pies.
Ideally Brian gets to play as the designated loose man and support the likes of Hahn and Shaggy who may be forced to play on bigger opponents. Mick will send Dawes to him and make him accountable – he has a vice like grip and is very strong, but Lake has a chance to peel off. Let’s hope he is switched on.
Harbrow vs Beams
Why is it a key?
Harbrow has been beaten the last two times. His ability to break free and use his pace to set up attacks will be critical in actually scoring on the night.
I like this match up a lot more than Harbrow vs Davis, particularly with Harbrow’s inability to get his shoulders above his head to spoil. Beams plays high and gets into the midfield which I think suits us.
When Beams gets sucked in to ball chasing, it will allow Harbrow to stay on the defensive side and play a clean-up role which he does well (1 hand scoop, blaze away). With his pace and footwork, he will be a key to us breaking the game open and he needs to kick WELL.
Murphy vs Leon Davis
Davis has murdered Harbrow the last 2 times and we need to change it up. I suspect that Macaffer may go to Murphy (or Gilbee) but if we can manipulate this match up at least we know that Murph will contest better in the air.
Leon’s defensive pressure is good, but I’d back Murph as the one guy in our back line that’s smart enough to find the space and use it well. His form heading in to September is superior to the last two year’s.
Comment