Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

[SlimPickens]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

If Hahn plays he will have to play forward. To much of a liability to play down back.

[1eyedog]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Who could Hahn pick up in St.Kilda's attack if required?

I don't know, that sexy female goal umpire if she officiates?

[1eyedog]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Who could Hahn pick up in St.Kilda's attack if required?

Himself off the canvas? He doesn't have a match up out there, too slow to go with anyone not tall enough to compete.

[Greystache]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Himself off the canvas? He doesn't have a match up out there, too slow to go with anyone not tall enough to compete.

I'm sure he'll play forward, but I wouldn't be surprised to seem him do some rotations through the midfield, especially if it become a tight lockdown type of struggle. He did that against the Swans in the last quarter and won a few clearances with his bullocking style.

[Mantis]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

I'm sure he'll play forward, but I wouldn't be surprised to seem him do some rotations through the midfield, especially if it become a tight lockdown type of struggle. He did that against the Swans in the last quarter and won a few clearances with his bullocking style.

Agree with that.

If he could take Fisher or Blake out of the game when forward, snag a goal or two (or even create them) and win a few hard balls he would have done his job.

Just not sure he can.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

I don't know, that sexy female goal umpire if she officiates?

Haha.. and ... oh yeah

Himself off the canvas?

LOL

I'm sure he'll play forward, but I wouldn't be surprised to seem him do some rotations through the midfield, especially if it become a tight lockdown type of struggle. He did that against the Swans in the last quarter and won a few clearances with his bullocking style.

Truly, bar no other game in the season, this is the ideal Mitch Hahn stage.

Or it should be.

Tough, tight, bullocking, pressure games.

[1eyedog]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

I'm sure he'll play forward, but I wouldn't be surprised to seem him do some rotations through the midfield, especially if it become a tight lockdown type of struggle. He did that against the Swans in the last quarter and won a few clearances with his bullocking style.

This term is always used to describe Hahn's style of play, unfortunately he can't even get to contests anymore to use it. I hope I eat humble pie on Saturday night regarding Hahn, but all his possessions appear rushed which seriously compromises his disposal efficiency and ultimately our ability to go forward with any structure. Best he gets ball and handballs to someone in a blue jumper.

He just needs to go hammer and tong and kill, kill, kill. I would give Hahn clear instructions to do a Mark Yeates on BJ at the first bounce on Saturday night and then bring Hill in for the Granny.

[comrade]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Mitch Hahn gets the same job that Welshy had last year; line up next to Sam Gilbert and ****ing terrorise him.

If he's not prepared to be a **** for 2 hours, then he doesn't play.

[Desipura]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

What I would like to see and also being realistic: (Eagle won't be dropped)

Out: Hooper, Hahn

In: Morris, Hill


Hooper - only 5 disposals last week, good experience will be a regular next year
(

Based on what??????? If he had 10 possessions would he be captain?

[Desipura]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Agree with that.

If he could take Fisher or Blake out of the game when forward, snag a goal or two (or even create them) and win a few hard balls he would have done his job.

Just not sure he can.

It would mean we are a fair chance of winning if this happened. I would be very suprised if the winning team kicks more than 12 goals.

[Mantis]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

It would mean we are a fair chance of winning if this happened. I would be very suprised if the winning team kicks more than 12 goals.

I can't see us kicking more than this amount and to do so Hall will probably have to kick 5 or 6.

If St.Kilda spilt us open I can see them kicking 14 to 16.

[Sedat]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Saints haven't even had 16 scoring shots against us in the last 2 matches, let alone 16 goals. It was 7.7 in Round 6 and 9.6 in the PF. Not saying it can't happen, but we would have to implode pretty horribly for the Saints to get to 100 points.

[Mantis]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Saints haven't even had 16 scoring shots against us in the last 2 matches, let alone 16 goals. It was 7.7 in Round 6 and 9.6 in the PF. Not saying it can't happen, but we would have to implode pretty horribly for the Saints to get to 100 points.

If we dished up a like performance to what was offered against Collingwood just 2 weeks back I would think that St.Kilda will rack up a reasonable score.

Hopefully such a performance won't be presented and our efforts in the 2 previous PF's suggest it won't, but I still have some lingering doubts.

[johnnycoop]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

I don't know, that sexy female goal umpire if she officiates?

Chelsea loves the Dogs, she's on our side!

Hahn up forward if we have to. Bigger body and has some games under the belt.

[johnnycoop]

Re: Preliminary Final - WOOF Selection Table

Saints haven't even had 16 scoring shots against us in the last 2 matches, let alone 16 goals. It was 7.7 in Round 6 and 9.6 in the PF. Not saying it can't happen, but we would have to implode pretty horribly for the Saints to get to 100 points.

I completely agree. Saints haven't really kicked a score against decent oppo for a long time , on average, if we kick more than 70 points we win. 10.10.