If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I don want to drive myself crazy worrying about who will/wont go this year and it would be a flip o the coin out of these two for mine.
Is it too early to start watching the young talents of the new teams (especially GC) with the intention of poaching some of their kids?
I am not talking about the Swallows, more the kids in the middle. There is always the "want to go home factor" and I assume that as some of these kids blossom and start demanding more cash fitting them all in to their cap is going to be impossible.
Does anyone know when their extra salary cap concessions end? That won't help them.
That's an interesting point. Never even crossed my mind.
I'm saving this post as admission of and evidence to that you're not, in fact, always right !
I'm thinking of changing my name to "Seldom Wrong". Nah...I'll stick with "Always Right"....much more arrogant and more likely to get up people's noses.
I don want to drive myself crazy worrying about who will/wont go this year and it would be a flip o the coin out of these two for mine.
Is it too early to start watching the young talents of the new teams (especially GC) with the intention of poaching some of their kids?
I am not talking about the Swallows, more the kids in the middle. There is always the "want to go home factor" and I assume that as some of these kids blossom and start demanding more cash fitting them all in to their cap is going to be impossible.
Does anyone know when their extra salary cap concessions end? That won't help them.
I think this actually poses more of a threat than an opportunity. I think the so-called big Melb clubs will be using the farcical third party payment system to bring stars back to Melb. Think Buckley, Clement, Judd, Kane Johnson, McPhee (ok scrap McPhee).. all over again. Struggling to think of many we 'got back' from WC/Bris/Adelaides, etc.. Eagleton is the only one that comes to mind (but I think we only marginally did well out of that in the long-term). We lost a hell of alot to these club at inception (Hardie, Edmund, McGuinness, Tregenza, etc..) for not much return...
I think the club should be on the front foot about this and be asking some questions to afl about the legitimacy of these deals before GC/GWS start leaking players
I think this actually poses more of a threat than an opportunity. I think the so-called big Melb clubs will be using the farcical third party payment system to bring stars back to Melb. Think Buckley, Clement, Judd, Kane Johnson, McPhee (ok scrap McPhee).. all over again. Struggling to think of many we 'got back' from WC/Bris/Adelaides, etc.. Eagleton is the only one that comes to mind (but I think we only marginally did well out of that in the long-term). We lost a hell of alot to these club at inception (Hardie, Edmund, McGuinness, Tregenza, etc..) for not much return...
I think the club should be on the front foot about this and be asking some questions to afl about the legitimacy of these deals before GC/GWS start leaking players
Yeah very good point and a huge potential for concern. I think our club is a much more attractive place to land these days and, as can be seen with the Aker and Hall scenarios, when all is above board and fair we should be able to shake our fair share of oranges from the tree. But I agree that the club should be proactive about third party "juddesque" deals now because we don't have the same financial muscle to get the next big thing by giving their pet dog a secretarial role at WO with a salary of 500k.
Yeah very good point and a huge potential for concern. I think our club is a much more attractive place to land these days and, as can be seen with the Aker and Hall scenarios, when all is above board and fair we should be able to shake our fair share of oranges from the tree. But I agree that the club should be proactive about third party "juddesque" deals now because we don't have the same financial muscle to get the next big thing by giving their pet dog a secretarial role at WO with a salary of 500k.
While I love your comment I don't think Rebecca Twigley would find it as amusing as I do.
Comment