If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hmm not sure what to make of this final team. No 2nd ruck has me scratching my head a bit, as i will cringe to see Tommy running thru the centre taking centre bounces
Hill for the Sub, and i hope Stack can actually show something as i dont rate him at all. Hopefully a HBF role can invigorate some potential (if its there).
Jones and bbh to ruck in front half. Hudson to stay mid and back maybe.
Only problem there is the bombers rucks keeping running forward dragging Hudson down back to cover. If they do this all game he will be run off his feet.
[QUOTE=The Pie Man;204498][QUOTE=Mantis;204486]You think?
It's plainly obvious that due a number of key outs in defence Stack has been given an opportunity as he has showed some form down there through the pre-season.
Sure Stack hasn't been a consistent performer as yet, but he deserves this opportunity and I hope he goes well.
I'm with you on that Mantis - I've been a bit harsh on Brennan, but at his best he's a smooth mover with good disposal who could just make the HB line work. I think it's worth a try, and will not blame the coaching staff if it doesn't work.
I wish him well, will be very handy if he & Markovic can play well and give the backline more options moving forward.
It's early in the season. Good opportunity to show some faith in potentials.
You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus
In terms of the second ruck could there be a chance of Markovic playing there? Hille is still coming back to full fitness so may play second fiddle to Ryder, so could Markovic just be given a role to follow Hille around. This would mean when Hille is forward Markovic matches up on him, and when he pushes into the ruck Markovic follows.
I'm not sure on his rucking ability, but he's not far off being big enough and it could help us curb Hille's influence around the ground.
No second ruck? Surely we can't have Williams in there with Essendon playing Hurley/Ryder/Hille forward and no Lake.
This is just my opinion but:
Using Williams to support one ruckman is a mistake.
Using Williams to support one ruckman given we already have a depleted back line is and even bigger mistake.
Why not include Barlow?
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
This is just my opinion but:
Using Williams to support one ruckman is a mistake.
Using Williams to support one ruckman given we already have a depleted back line is and even bigger mistake.
A number of WOOF posters predicted a side with Williams and Morris in the key defensive posts. Perhaps this is the plan. Markovic can play back, forward or in the ruck and has played in all three of rhese positions with Williamstown last year. He could be used to give Hudson, Morris and Williams rests at different stages. Big Barry has often contested boundary throw ins deep in the forward line.
Of course the possibility also exists that Rocket may make a late change and bring in either Minson or Barlow. Historically rookies don't get promoted until they are actually going to be selected, so if Barlow has been promoted he is probably a good chance to get a last minute call-up.
The Angels have the phone box. [SIZE="2"]Don't blink![/SIZE]
Comment