Round #16 Match Committee

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 1eyedog
    Hall of Fame
    • Mar 2008
    • 13237

    Re: Round #16 Match Committee

    Originally posted by Rocco Jones
    Totally agree. Yet another reason we can't play Gilbee IMO too. Gilbee and Higgins in the same backline against Carlton's forward line depth would be a recipe for disaster. Both are attack before defence type defenders but Higgins is better at both attack and defence atm. I think Robinson will go to Higgins. I only see one man for Garlett and that's Morris due to his pace (Picken is another option but you'd think he'd get Judd or Murphy).
    That would be a win for us I feel. It means that he won't go to Bob Murphy and it should free Bob up a bit. Furthermore, Robinson has been very damaging in the midfield, probably their most improved next to Murphy and if he plays a defensive role on Higgins then there only other reall defensive midfield option is Carazzo and I don't rate him.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

    Comment

    • Rocco Jones
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jun 2008
      • 6932

      Re: Round #16 Match Committee

      Originally posted by aker39
      Barlow is out with finger injury.
      Originally posted by bornadog
      Roughead in?
      I get your line of thinking bornadog but Barlow hasn't played the 2nd ruck role for us. I think what we lose most from Barlow being out is his run and I would like to see him replaced by a runner/mid.

      For mine Roughy should be battling for the 2nd ruck spot with Jones. As much as I love Jones, he doesn't offer us enough ATM without ruck duties. I'm happy to have either in.

      Comment

      • always right
        WOOF Member
        • Nov 2007
        • 4189

        Re: Round #16 Match Committee

        Originally posted by Rocco Jones
        I get your line of thinking bornadog but Barlow hasn't played the 2nd ruck role for us. I think what we lose most from Barlow being out is his run and I would like to see him replaced by a runner/mid.

        For mine Roughy should be battling for the 2nd ruck spot with Jones. As much as I love Jones, he doesn't offer us enough ATM without ruck duties. I'm happy to have either in.
        I don't get this. Jones is our only lead up forward. Why do people get in their minds he doesn't offer enough?
        I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.

        Comment

        • Bornadog
          WOOF Clubhouse Leader
          • Jan 2007
          • 66774

          Re: Round #16 Match Committee

          Originally posted by Rocco Jones
          I get your line of thinking bornadog but Barlow hasn't played the 2nd ruck role for us. I think what we lose most from Barlow being out is his run and I would like to see him replaced by a runner/mid.

          For mine Roughy should be battling for the 2nd ruck spot with Jones. As much as I love Jones, he doesn't offer us enough ATM without ruck duties. I'm happy to have either in.
          I think the MC will bring Roughead in.
          FFC: Established 1883

          Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

          Comment

          • Bornadog
            WOOF Clubhouse Leader
            • Jan 2007
            • 66774

            Re: Round #16 Match Committee

            Originally posted by aker39
            Barlow is out with finger injury.
            Had an operation on Monday and he said he will play next week.
            FFC: Established 1883

            Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

            Comment

            Working...