More re-signings

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Topdog
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 7471

    #16
    Re: More re-signings

    Originally posted by The Underdog
    I saw a tweet that said they won't release the contract details which is club policy.
    must be a new policy.

    Comment

    • AndrewP6
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jan 2009
      • 8142

      #17
      Re: More re-signings

      Originally posted by Topdog
      must be a new policy.
      Makes sense to me, I don't see why such information should be made public.
      [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

      Comment

      • Sedat
        Hall of Fame
        • Sep 2007
        • 11248

        #18
        Re: More re-signings

        Originally posted by Mantis
        You would hope not.
        I wouldn't rule out anything when it comes to player contracts and James Fantasia.
        "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

        Comment

        • LostDoggy
          WOOF Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 8307

          #19
          Re: More re-signings

          I thought Cross was fighting the dogs for 2 when we only wanted 1. (Boyd with 3 and 2)
          I would be happy enough with 3 and 1. I guess we might know soon as my guess is it will be announced tonight

          Comment

          • GVGjr
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 44636

            #20
            Re: More re-signings

            Originally posted by divvydan
            It seems a little strange to me that they haven't released the length of the contracts publicly.
            I heard Cross's contract for the second year depends on how many games he plays next year. Got it from a good source.
            Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

            Comment

            • Topdog
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 7471

              #21
              Re: More re-signings

              Originally posted by AndrewP6
              Makes sense to me, I don't see why such information should be made public.
              Because at the end of the day all decisions should be made available to the members / shareholders.

              Comment

              Working...