Something I've wondered about for a while now is why we dont have the same sorts of names that soccer clubs have. It'd b easy to say that soccer clubs are older or have more tradition than football clubs but that isnt the case. Both sports have clubs that are roughly as old as one another and given the way that Australia used to look to England for most of it's cultural inspiration I'm suprised that there arent more Collingwood (Collingwood and Britannia) Uniteds or North Melbourne (North and Hotham) Citys and the like.
Nearly every AFL club is the result of amalgamations/mergers between junior clubs in the 1880s and 1890s. Footscray was the end result of 3 junior clubs meging over a few years in order to get sufficient players/ground/local support in order to get accepted into the VFA. From memory we are the result of Belgravia, Footscray and another club joining forces so why did the founders just settle on the name of just one of the junior clubs involved?
Nearly every AFL club is the result of amalgamations/mergers between junior clubs in the 1880s and 1890s. Footscray was the end result of 3 junior clubs meging over a few years in order to get sufficient players/ground/local support in order to get accepted into the VFA. From memory we are the result of Belgravia, Footscray and another club joining forces so why did the founders just settle on the name of just one of the junior clubs involved?
Comment