Match Committee- Round 19 vs North Melbourne
Collapse
X
-
Re: Match Committee- Round 19 vs North Melbourne
Do you read posts before answering? Either you do not understand what is read or you just refuse to understand and just fire away (which you have a habit of doing).
I will clarify for you, I did not blame Gia for being offered 2 years, my point being when I offered my opinion that he should only get 1 year, it was said that I was Gia bashing.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee- Round 19 vs North Melbourne
Do you read posts before answering? Either you do not understand what is read or you just refuse to understand and just fire away (which you have a habit of doing).
I will clarify for you, I did not blame Gia for being offered 2 years, my point being when I offered my opinion that he should only get 1 year, it was said that I was Gia bashing.
I think many of us thought 2 years was too much.
Based on performance last year which is what you always bag him on, he deserved 2 years,based on age 1.
To me your pointing out the club made a mistake.
Btw We have a player based anchor & banker thread every week. How is it players escape scrutiny?Comment
-
Re: Match Committee- Round 19 vs North Melbourne
Like when I said Gia should only have been offered a one year contract last season, people thought I was Gia bashing.
It's ok to constantly bag the coach and MC however do not dare to offer an opinion on a player I believe only had a year left in the game.
By the way, well done to the coach and MC for playing Roughy at CHB, looked like a natural in that position today. Played the best game in his short career, hopefully this is a turning point for him.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee- Round 19 vs North Melbourne
So it's a I told you so post? Good on you champ.
I think many of us thought 2 years was too much.
Based on performance last year which is what you always bag him on, he deserved 2 years,based on age 1.
To me your pointing out the club made a mistake.
Btw We have a player based anchor & banker thread every week. How is it players escape scrutiny?
When you defend a player who is badly out of form like Jones you blame the coaching, yet you do not comment when the coach makes a good move like playing Roughy at CHB, that's poor form.
I was responding to bornadog who was stating last year that Jones should be dropped and most shot him down, I was pointed out he was not alone.
If you don't like what I post don't reply. You never did have a balanced view on things.
Go on have the final say.Comment
Comment