Without knowing a whole lot about the movers and shakers behind the scenes I must admit I have been very impressed with Mooney and what he seems to bring to the table. He is well spoken, reads the game well and from all reports is a great teacher.
As things were unravelling at times on the weekend he often chimed in with insightful comments, but as much as I enjoy his commentary I found myself thinking "don't tell me, get the message to the players!" His comments around Jones in the first quarter really seemed to be critical and I am wondering whether he got to him at quarter time because he changed his game dramatically after this. I felt that Jones needed Mooney on the bench and getting to him early in that quarter when he was struggling to work out how to get himself into the game.
Is it a question of funds that sees a couple of blokes that do work with various players tied up in the media, or would they have a limited role on matchday anyways? Is this another area where the rich/poor divide hurts? Or would it be a "too many cooks spoiling the broth" situation so they don't have a role during the quarter?
As things were unravelling at times on the weekend he often chimed in with insightful comments, but as much as I enjoy his commentary I found myself thinking "don't tell me, get the message to the players!" His comments around Jones in the first quarter really seemed to be critical and I am wondering whether he got to him at quarter time because he changed his game dramatically after this. I felt that Jones needed Mooney on the bench and getting to him early in that quarter when he was struggling to work out how to get himself into the game.
Is it a question of funds that sees a couple of blokes that do work with various players tied up in the media, or would they have a limited role on matchday anyways? Is this another area where the rich/poor divide hurts? Or would it be a "too many cooks spoiling the broth" situation so they don't have a role during the quarter?
Comment