Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dry Rot
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 6471

    #1

    Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

    New coach, new hope and it's an even year - how will the Dees go?

    IIRC they got hit hard by injuries last season but IMHO their whole season resembled our last 7 games. A dodgy defence, a patchy midfield and two ageing and injury prone forward stars in Robertson and Neitz doesn't look like a potent mix to me.

    Without major injuries they may crack 9 -12 but with major injuries finish where they did in 2007.

    Is this being too pessimistic?
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.
  • Sockeye Salmon
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 6365

    #2
    Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

    Better than 2007. Will improve and might even sneak into the 8.

    Comment

    • Dry Rot
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jan 2007
      • 6471

      #3
      Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

      Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
      Better than 2007. Will improve and might even sneak into the 8.
      Fair enough - why?
      The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

      Comment

      • hujsh
        Hall of Fame
        • Nov 2007
        • 11961

        #4
        Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

        Originally posted by Dry Rot
        Fair enough - why?
        They had more injuries than we ever had.

        They only had about 27 players available at one stage and when they had their best side for the year they beat us
        [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

        Comment

        • Mantis
          Hall of Fame
          • Apr 2007
          • 15547

          #5
          Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

          Originally posted by hujsh
          They had more injuries than we ever had.

          They only had about 27 players available at one stage and when they had their best side for the year they beat us
          And that was a tough task wasn't it.

          Comment

          • Go_Dogs
            Hall of Fame
            • Jan 2007
            • 10251

            #6
            Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

            I think Melbourne have some good young players in the likes of Dunn, Bate, McLean, Sylvia etc as well as Morton surely going to be straight into their mix. If these younger players step up again I think they can expect to have some reasonable success. They should be aiming to make the 8, but quite likely will just miss out, imo.
            Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?

            Comment

            • hujsh
              Hall of Fame
              • Nov 2007
              • 11961

              #7
              Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

              Originally posted by Mantis
              And that was a tough task wasn't it.
              We weren't completely devasted at that stage yet. We were once we lost.
              [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

              Comment

              • BulldogBelle
                WOOF Member
                • Nov 2006
                • 5284

                #8
                Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

                Melbourne did not have a great season in 2007.

                A new coach - perhaps will reignite them. They need a bit of luck to go their way, injuries have savaged them in recent times.

                Prediction: 10 - 13th or thereabouts.

                Comment

                • GVGjr
                  Moderator
                  • Nov 2006
                  • 45548

                  #9
                  Re: Rate a team in 2008: Melbourne

                  16 to 14 for mine. I think the new coach will struggle because the team is still a few years away for getting much better. He will do well with them in a few seasons.
                  Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                  Comment

                  Working...