Re: Coaching tactics - will Macca change our game plan?
Intelligence is what wins any battle. To employ the right tactics, you need to know your enemy. You analyse his strength, and his weakness, and exploit both. In turn, you deny him intelligence, making sure he cannot guess at what your plan is until he has lost the battle.
So turning that to football: you ensure your team can counter another's offensive strategy, with strength and tenacity to repel their attack. I think we've made large strides in this area, and I think most would agree. How we then turn the tide of battle towards our attack is something I don't want to see until the time is right, because the more you show now, the more intelligence you give away.
I'm ex-Navy. Our tactics were always to deny the enemy your position, course and speed, whilst moving heaven and earth to ascertain his. Deny him as much knowledge of your tactics and your capabilities as you can, until the finger is on the trigger. Then boom! Five-inch time!!
I agree with both of you, in a way. From 2005-09, you were right bornadog, then from 2010 onwards TBB has it correct. Eade, to be fair, was chasing a flag, and was less inclined to want to try and teach a different style in fear of upsetting the ship. He was too conservative, that's all, and given the club and circumstances, I can understand that approach.
I said many times last year that I believe his ‘copy Geelong’ philosophy was just a front: I see us emulating Sydney far more than Geelong. Develop that Bloods culture, then let it loose. Every player trained to trust his team mate, and to engender that same trust in himself. Hard. Accountable. The flexible will come with experience.
Intelligence is what wins any battle. To employ the right tactics, you need to know your enemy. You analyse his strength, and his weakness, and exploit both. In turn, you deny him intelligence, making sure he cannot guess at what your plan is until he has lost the battle.
So turning that to football: you ensure your team can counter another's offensive strategy, with strength and tenacity to repel their attack. I think we've made large strides in this area, and I think most would agree. How we then turn the tide of battle towards our attack is something I don't want to see until the time is right, because the more you show now, the more intelligence you give away.
I'm ex-Navy. Our tactics were always to deny the enemy your position, course and speed, whilst moving heaven and earth to ascertain his. Deny him as much knowledge of your tactics and your capabilities as you can, until the finger is on the trigger. Then boom! Five-inch time!!
I agree with both of you, in a way. From 2005-09, you were right bornadog, then from 2010 onwards TBB has it correct. Eade, to be fair, was chasing a flag, and was less inclined to want to try and teach a different style in fear of upsetting the ship. He was too conservative, that's all, and given the club and circumstances, I can understand that approach.
I said many times last year that I believe his ‘copy Geelong’ philosophy was just a front: I see us emulating Sydney far more than Geelong. Develop that Bloods culture, then let it loose. Every player trained to trust his team mate, and to engender that same trust in himself. Hard. Accountable. The flexible will come with experience.
Comment