Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ghost Dog
    WOOF Member
    • May 2010
    • 9404

    #31
    Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

    I saw videos of Crameri doing sprints and his rate of acceleration was unbelievable.
    I'd like to see his beep test but would wager it's not that far off Griffen's.
    You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus

    Comment

    • Mofra
      Hall of Fame
      • Dec 2006
      • 14868

      #32
      Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

      Originally posted by Happy Days
      Yep. It's an attempt at switching to open up the game by carrying down the open side right? Coz that doesn't work when it takes you a literal minute to kick it twice. And it's uncontested so they're not even cracking in!
      It might just be - but teams are smart enough to corale the kicking player instead of tackle them to ensure our clearances are poor quality. We get 50/50 on the clearance stats yet ours are shitful kick & hopes to an undersized forwardline, any opposition that runs into space and plays to move the ball forward as a priority will have a huge advantage over us.

      Pace in the middle is almost irrelevant in many of our contests: we could have 3 Usain Bolts in the middle, if you handball backwards to a stationary player who has opponents nearby they have two options: release by hand or rush a kick over a pack, because they cannot hold and assess options.
      Teams will keep making us choose one of those two options and cut us up on the rebound.
      Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

      Comment

      • Scorlibo
        Coaching Staff
        • Oct 2007
        • 3073

        #33
        Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

        Originally posted by EJ Smith
        Anchors

        Game set-up. It looked like Little league. All players in the vicinity charging in for the ball. No outriders to give the ball to.

        No pace in the forward line. In fact no pace elsewhere.

        Crameri is a replica of Stringer - neither big nor small and no pace

        Bankers

        Talia, Williams and Tutt are hopefully available
        Originally posted by always right
        Pace is not an issue...work rate is. He seems to choose when he wants to go. I watched him almost run down a North player yesterday when he started 15 meters behind him. On other occasions he made little effort. Both he and Jones have great pace which makes it even more surprising why Jones in particular struggles to get separation from his opponent.
        Can't agree with either of you, I think Crameri has pretty exceptional pace and an exceptional wort rate to boot. Give him some time, and our forward line time, to settle in.
        'And the Western suburbs erupt!'

        Comment

        • The bulldog tragician
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2013
          • 1974

          #34
          Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

          It's all been said but
          Bankers:
          Dale Morris, the most under rated champ in the game ( I also Liked Roughie's game a lot
          The work ethic, if not the finishing skills of Dahl, the class of Hunter and MacRae
          Lin Jong is a real favorite of mine. Loved his desire and ferocious attack on the footy.

          Anchors:
          Kicking skills AND decision making combined: not just the bad kick, but the bad option, poorly executed
          The first half was just excruciatingly bad as a spectacle
          Selection.. Lack of talls? Please explain!
          [url]www.bulldogtragician.com[/url] A blog about being a lifelong fan of the Dogs and our quixotic attempt to replicate 1954. AND WE DID
          Author of [URL="http://www.blackincbooks.com.au/books/mighty-west"]"The Mighty West: the Bulldogs journey from daydream believers to premiership heroes[/URL]"
          Twitter @bulldogstragic

          Comment

          • Dancin' Douggy
            WOOF Member
            • Oct 2007
            • 2877

            #35
            Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

            Bankers.
            Hunter. This kid is an absolute gun.
            Vision skill arrogance, he just sees the game so well. The angles on his kicks and his absolute confidence to take the game on are so bloody refreshing. He is a star. Might even be the best kid out of that draft.

            Macrae. This kid is an absolute gun.
            Vision skill arrogance, he just sees the game so well. The angles on his kicks and his absolute confidence to take the game on are so bloody refreshing. He is a star. Might even be the best kid out of that draft.

            Dalhaus. This kid is an absolute gun.
            Vision skill arrogance, he just sees the game so well. The angles on his kicks and his absolute confidence to take the game on are so bloody refreshing. He is a star. Might even be the best kid out of that draft.(poetic licence)

            Anchors. None really. It was a tough brutal game, but no one really thought we'd beat Norf.

            I must say though, it's so disappointing watching Koby do all the hard work, like grabbing the contested ball breaking a tackle and slicing through some traffic, only to handball the ball straight to a teammates feet when he's finally in the clear and under no pressure. If he could just maintain his concentration and finish off his good work we would have got out of a lot more congestion than we did. But the sloppy handball creates another ugly maul and it just happens too often with Koby. Love his endeavour, but just give us that last 5% and hit someone on the chest with a handball, he could really be a powerful weapon.

            And I agree that Jones should be played at CHB. He might turn into a good CHF, but he ain't one now.

            Was surprised Stringer was subbed off. He just needs as much game time as he can get. He might just turn out to be the best kid from that draft.

            Comment

            • AndrewP6
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2009
              • 8142

              #36
              Re: Bankers and Anchors - Round 2

              Originally posted by Dancin' Douggy
              Bankers.
              Hunter. This kid is an absolute gun.
              Vision skill arrogance, he just sees the game so well. The angles on his kicks and his absolute confidence to take the game on are so bloody refreshing. He is a star. Might even be the best kid out of that draft.

              Macrae. This kid is an absolute gun.
              Vision skill arrogance, he just sees the game so well. The angles on his kicks and his absolute confidence to take the game on are so bloody refreshing. He is a star. Might even be the best kid out of that draft.

              Dalhaus. This kid is an absolute gun.
              Vision skill arrogance, he just sees the game so well. The angles on his kicks and his absolute confidence to take the game on are so bloody refreshing. He is a star. Might even be the best kid out of that draft.(poetic licence)

              Anchors. None really. It was a tough brutal game, but no one really thought we'd beat Norf.

              I must say though, it's so disappointing watching Koby do all the hard work, like grabbing the contested ball breaking a tackle and slicing through some traffic, only to handball the ball straight to a teammates feet when he's finally in the clear and under no pressure. If he could just maintain his concentration and finish off his good work we would have got out of a lot more congestion than we did. But the sloppy handball creates another ugly maul and it just happens too often with Koby. Love his endeavour, but just give us that last 5% and hit someone on the chest with a handball, he could really be a powerful weapon.

              And I agree that Jones should be played at CHB. He might turn into a good CHF, but he ain't one now.

              Was surprised Stringer was subbed off. He just needs as much game time as he can get. He might just turn out to be the best kid from that draft.
              So you're saying we have lots of good kids?
              [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

              Comment

              Working...