If Carlton will take him after Zaine's selection, do we take him, risk it or expect to rookie him?
Jayden Foster
Collapse
X
-
Jayden Foster
21Take him at 470%2Let Carlton take him at 630%5Expect bluff, he'll be a rookie0%10Don't want him at all0%4Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Tags: None -
Re: Jayden Foster
Stick to our original plan, which was to not draft him.
If he makes it to the rookie draft and we want him there take him as a rookie. If Carlton rate him higher than us then they can have him.I should leave it alone but you're not right -
Re: Jayden Foster
Don't want him at all. His endurance appears to be very ordinary, blew up in 2nd half of the TAC grand final. Doesn't have the strongest hands either, for a KPF.Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
Shame though it may be, its nostalgia that is driving the Foster push. Trust Macca et al that they have done their homework.Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
Foster going to Carlton with 63. Done.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
I'm like you Webby. I feel our selections were very short sited. No pun intended.Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
If we nominated him as a rookie selection, Carlton still had the opportunity to select him in the ND so nothing changes.Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
Your opinion and you are entitled to it, Foster is a wait and see, not convinced you can be so sure we will come to regret not taking him. Regarding your lack of faith in the lack of height drafted tonight, I believe that the trade period addressed some of your concerns with Boyd 199cms, Hamling 195cm, and Cordy 192cm joining the club. Tonight seemed to be about improving some glaring ground level weaknesses notably decision making and disposal efficiency which I am sure is a concern for most on here.Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
Your opinion and you are entitled to it, Foster is a wait and see, not convinced you can be so sure we will come to regret not taking him. Regarding your lack of faith in the lack of height drafted tonight, I believe that the trade period addressed some of your concerns with Boyd 199cms, Hamling 195cm, and Cordy 192cm joining the club. Tonight seemed to be about improving some glaring ground level weaknesses notably decision making and disposal efficiency which I am sure is a concern for most on here.Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
Your opinion and you are entitled to it, Foster is a wait and see, not convinced you can be so sure we will come to regret not taking him. Regarding your lack of faith in the lack of height drafted tonight, I believe that the trade period addressed some of your concerns with Boyd 199cms, Hamling 195cm, and Cordy 192cm joining the club. Tonight seemed to be about improving some glaring ground level weaknesses notably decision making and disposal efficiency which I am sure is a concern for most on here.
And during that time, I've seen a bloke called Peter Foster RULE our half back line for the best part of 8 or 9 seasons as a late bloomer. Then his son (a kid with a big frame and good hands who topped the TAC Cup goal kicking last season) not get nominated with a pick 70/something under the F/S rule... Forgive my disappointment on that one, too!
Particularly when we've got Dahlhaus, Hunter, Honeychurch and Hrovat already... I really do hope we rookie list some talls.. Foster would've been nice.... But we rolled the dice tonight and lost on that front. Disappointing.Comment
-
Re: Jayden Foster
We've been undersized since the late 1970's. Constantly one or two talls short of a genuine flag shot, so forgive my frustration.
And during that time, I've seen a bloke called Peter Foster RULE our half back line for the best part of 8 or 9 seasons as a late bloomer. Then his son (a kid with a big frame and good hands who topped the TAC Cup goal kicking last season) not get nominated with a pick 70/something under the F/S rule... Forgive my disappointment on that one, too!
Particularly when we've got Dahlhaus, Hunter, Honeychurch and Hrovat already... I really do hope we rookie list some talls.. Foster would've been nice.... But we rolled the dice tonight and lost on that front. Disappointing.Comment
Comment