If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
No we won't. St Kilda made the GF this year with Zac Dawson at FB. Lake is overrating himself here -- and to make new demands even though the club has bent over backwards meeting all of his previous demands is bad faith.
If Lake leaves, sure, there'll be a drop down in class, but we'll trade for a developing tall backman from another club and make do with the stopgap. We'll also stop giving up 3 goals a game to Brian's brainfades.
Of course, we'll lose 6 goals when Hargrave is forced to go in a one on one contest with a forward that Lake would usually outmark/compete with. And that's no slight on Shaggy.
Priority number 1 is signing Lake for mine. If they have to up the offer and can afford to do it (and I don't know if they can or not), then do it.
Doesn't matter - we're on record as saying we wont trade out Lake.
Interesting stance from the club, I'm all for being tough but you've got to wonder when it starts to become stupidity. Sending Lake off to Melbourne or Freo for nothing may be satisfying knowing he's stuck at a no-hoper club but that first round draft pick offered for him could become a superstar.
Interesting stance from the club, I'm all for being tough but you've got to wonder when it starts to become stupidity. Sending Lake off to Melbourne or Freo for nothing may be satisfying knowing he's stuck at a no-hoper club but that first round draft pick offered for him could become a superstar.
And then in 6 years time that super star decides he wants more money and knows from the trading history of the club that we will make a deal and he can end up at the club of his choice.
At least if we take a stance it might mean other will be weary when deciding to leave the club.
Although free agency will be in by then and it won't matter at all.
It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.
Interesting stance from the club, I'm all for being tough but you've got to wonder when it starts to become stupidity. Sending Lake off to Melbourne or Freo for nothing may be satisfying knowing he's stuck at a no-hoper club but that first round draft pick offered for him could become a superstar.
He's contracted until the 31st of October, so if he wants out and we don't trade him, we have a couple of weeks to convince him or he can change his mind, as his options will be Demons or Dogs.
No we won't. St Kilda made the GF this year with Zac Dawson at FB. Lake is overrating himself here -- and to make new demands even though the club has bent over backwards meeting all of his previous demands is bad faith.
If Lake leaves, sure, there'll be a drop down in class, but we'll trade for a developing tall backman from another club and make do with the stopgap. We'll also stop giving up 3 goals a game to Brian's brainfades.
Exactly, we are still going to be a very, very good side if Lake leaves.
IMO i think it's Collingwood who is after him. And if so N.Brown and their first pick should be minimum compensation.
he's contracted until the 31st of october, so if he wants out and we don't trade him, we have a couple of weeks to convince him or he can change his mind, as his options will be demons or dogs.
He's contracted until the 31st of October, so if he wants out and we don't trade him, we have a couple of weeks to convince him or he can change his mind, as his options will be Demons or Dogs.
Not sure how he would be seen around the group if thats the only reason he stayed and how he would perform when his heart isn't in the place.
To summarise the reasons Brian Lake has not signed a contract yet:
- He wants more money
- His missus could have some influence
- He's not getting along with Rocket
- His manager wants the whole hoopla of Grand Final and Barry Hall wanting to join the dogs to die off, so Lake can have all the publicity,
- With the "new" cash flow the doggies will be receiving from the new deal with Etihad Stadium, Lake wants to see if the doggies will increase their offer.
- Rival clubs have increased their offer and Lake wants to see if the doggies will match it.
To summarise the reasons Brian Lake has not signed a contract yet:
- He wants more money
- His missus could have some influence
- He's not getting along with Rocket
- His manager wants the whole hoopla of Grand Final and Barry Hall wanting to join the dogs to die off, so Lake can have all the publicity,
- With the "new" cash flow the doggies will be receiving from the new deal with Etihad Stadium, Lake wants to see if the doggies will increase their offer.
- Rival clubs have increased their offer and Lake wants to see if the doggies will match it.
Anything else?
I'm sure global warming and the GFC have something to do with it.
[B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]
Comment