Big men, big worries

[LostDoggy]

WESTERN Bulldogs veteran Ben Hudson admits the AFL's decision to cut the number of interchange players down to three is causing concern among AFL ruckmen, who are fearful they will lose their spot in the team.

In 2011, interchange players will be cut from four to three in an attempt to stymie the mass rotations employed by some clubs.

The fourth player on the bench will be a substitute and can only be used if a teammate is taken out of the game. Many experts are predicting the back-up tall man will be expunged from the game as a result.

"Initially all ruckmen become fairly fearful when the rules basically knock one player out of the team because they assume the coaches will get rid of the tallest and slowest bloke," Hudson told afl.com.au

full article

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/106964/default.aspx

No Huddo we won't let them do it, especially the boo-ing bit

[Mantis]

Re: Big men, big worries

It hasn't been a great game for quite a while now.

[Missing Dog]

Re: Big men, big worries

It hasn't been a great game for quite a while now.

It sure beats any other game on the planet

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Big men, big worries

[/B]

It sure beats any other game on the planet

Perhaps, but it's not as good as it could be.

[Mantis]

Re: Big men, big worries

It sure beats any other game on the planet

When the Bulldogs are playing it comes close.

When other teams are playing it isn't even close and I could think of a number of other sporting events I would rather watch.... and it wasn't always this way.

[Before I Die]

Re: Big men, big worries

Is this an official meeting of the flat earth society, or do we have the two old blokes from the balcony on the Muppet Show posting?

I hate the constant rule changing as much as the next man (or woman), but take a look at the games from the 70s and 60s on late night TV. Today's game as a spectacle is so far ahead of what it was, that there is no real comparison.

[Hotdog60]

Re: Big men, big worries

Is this an official meeting of the flat earth society, or do we have the two old blokes from the balcony on the Muppet Show posting?

I hate the constant rule changing as much as the next man (or woman), but take a look at the games from the 70s and 60s on late night TV. Today's game as a spectacle is so far ahead of what it was, that there is no real comparison.

That's most likely true but the AFL should have stop playing with the rules 5 years ago. They wanted a fast game, now that they have it they now want to slow it back down.

[chef]

Re: Big men, big worries

When the Bulldogs are playing it comes close.

When other teams are playing it isn't even close and I could think of a number of other sporting events I would rather watch.... and it wasn't always this way.

Each to their own I guess, I still love watching the game as much as ever.

[Sockeye Salmon]

Re: Big men, big worries

Is this an official meeting of the flat earth society, or do we have the two old blokes from the balcony on the Muppet Show posting?

I hate the constant rule changing as much as the next man (or woman), but take a look at the games from the 70s and 60s on late night TV. Today's game as a spectacle is so far ahead of what it was, that there is no real comparison.

The skill and athletism of the players today is simply outstanding, no question about it.

My comment wasn't that it wasn't good - or even better or worse than it was - just that it could be so much better than it is.

[Missing Dog]

Re: Big men, big worries

Is this an official meeting of the flat earth society, or do we have the two old blokes from the balcony on the Muppet Show posting?

I hate the constant rule changing as much as the next man (or woman), but take a look at the games from the 70s and 60s on late night TV. Today's game as a spectacle is so far ahead of what it was, that there is no real comparison.

I used to watch many games of football each weekend. I now watch 1.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Big men, big worries

I thought for a moment that the article was going to be about Ben Hudson worrying about shaving off The Beard.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Big men, big worries

The skill and athletism of the players today is simply outstanding, no question about it.

My comment wasn't that it wasn't good - or even better or worse than it was - just that it could be so much better than it is.

I think that's the AFL viewpoint too, year after year after year....

[LostDoggy]

Re: Big men, big worries

The Beards got a good point. Rucks will probably suffer. Personally I like the fast pace and would like to see the interchange remain as it was.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Big men, big worries

I thought for a moment that the article was going to be about Ben Hudson worrying about shaving off The Beard.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Big men, big worries

The Beards got a good point. Rucks will probably suffer. Personally I like the fast pace and would like to see the interchange remain as it was.

I vote for the Flip-Side ,as I stated in the other thread we use three ruckmen , Hudson starting, Minson bench, Roughhead Sub . By doing this we keep them fresher throughout the season , Roughhead has the ability to cover HF or HB in case of an injury meaning a reshuffle due to injury doesn't change the structure too much , and if Roughhead is on early due to an injury I,m fine with that as the second ruckman on the ground can rest in the goal square . Now this of course means our bench of two players , one back , one forward will have to be well managed , the emphasis will be on skill and flexibility for the bench players . Ward is as must have for the Back , Jones is putting his hand up for the Forward.

Interesting times !!

.