Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MrMahatma
    Coaching Staff
    • Sep 2007
    • 3964

    Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross



    2 yr extensions for both.

    About right for Boyd. Would've thought maybe a 1 yr extension for Cross. But good to lock some blokes away.
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 66700

    #2
    Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

    Originally posted by MrMahatma
    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/af...-1226137267590

    2 yr extensions for both.

    About right for Boyd. Would've thought maybe a 1 yr extension for Cross. But good to lock some blokes away.
    2 years for both is what I would have given Cross is a year younger.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • Bornadog
      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
      • Jan 2007
      • 66700

      #3
      Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

      The club has done well with these negotiations, Gia is only getting a one year extension and they are negotiating with Dahlhaus for a 3 year contract.
      FFC: Established 1883

      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

      Comment

      • The Bulldogs Bite
        Hall of Fame
        • Dec 2006
        • 11245

        #4
        Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

        Cross is lucky to get 2 IMO.

        Agree Gia should get 1, Dahl 3.
        W00F!

        Comment

        • Desipura
          WOOF Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 4344

          #5
          Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

          Cross should have been given 1 year, interesting that Gia will be given 1, given that it could be argued his form has been the equal if not better than Cross.
          That said, I would have offered both of them 1 .

          Comment

          • LostDoggy
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 8307

            #6
            Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

            With a young midfield, and the money at GC and GWS we still need players off Boyd and Cross's experience, hardness and leadership. It's goign to be another two years at least until Libba, Wallis et al get up to the consistency needed of them.

            Comment

            • Maddog37
              WOOF Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 3132

              #7
              Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

              Happy with those contracts. Heart and sole of the club those guys IMO.

              Comment

              • Bornadog
                WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                • Jan 2007
                • 66700

                #8
                Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
                Cross is lucky to get 2 IMO.

                Agree Gia should get 1, Dahl 3.
                Originally posted by Desipura
                Cross should have been given 1 year, interesting that Gia will be given 1, given that it could be argued his form has been the equal if not better than Cross.
                That said, I would have offered both of them 1 .
                Why would you give Cross one year? Same old arguments, because you don't like him as a player? He is 28 years old and one of the fittest in the team, regularly picks up over 25 disposals a game, but because you don't appreciate him you would give him a one year contract? Sorry doesn't make sense to me.
                FFC: Established 1883

                Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                Comment

                • Mofra
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 14946

                  #9
                  Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                  Originally posted by Maddog37
                  Happy with those contracts. Heart and sole of the club those guys IMO.
                  Yup - we can't ask for loyalty from the players if we don't reward those who have given alot to the club in the first place.
                  Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                  Comment

                  • LostDoggy
                    WOOF Member
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 8307

                    #10
                    Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                    ^^^ Agreed, with all the youngsters in the mix now we need the old heads around the club to help them out.

                    Comment

                    • Missing Dog
                      WOOF Member
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 8501

                      #11
                      Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                      This is a great result so Gia remains the only player now out of contract is that right???

                      Comment

                      • Desipura
                        WOOF Member
                        • Mar 2008
                        • 4344

                        #12
                        Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                        Originally posted by bornadog
                        Why would you give Cross one year? Same old arguments, because you don't like him as a player? He is 28 years old and one of the fittest in the team, regularly picks up over 25 disposals a game, but because you don't appreciate him you would give him a one year contract? Sorry doesn't make sense to me.
                        What a load of crap, I admire Cross's courage and his ability to get the best out of himself. He is one of the hardest trainiers at the club and always leading the time trials. Your suggestion that I think he should be only offered a 1 year contract (because you believe I did not like him is way off the mark).

                        Unfortunately his lack of pace along with his average disposal is a liability in a team that should be assembling a team that can play the modern game. I would not be surprised if Cross is playing the 2nd year at Williamstown.

                        Comment

                        • Bornadog
                          WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 66700

                          #13
                          Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                          Originally posted by Desipura
                          What a load of crap, I admire Cross's courage and his ability to get the best out of himself. He is one of the hardest trainiers at the club and always leading the time trials. Your suggestion that I think he should be only offered a 1 year contract (because you believe I did not like him is way off the mark).

                          Unfortunately his lack of pace along with his average disposal is a liability in a team that should be assembling a team that can play the modern game. I would not be surprised if Cross is playing the 2nd year at Williamstown.
                          You admire him, your willing to give him a one year contract yet he is a liability. I think you are confused.

                          Either he is good enough to get a two year contract or nothing because he is not up to it.
                          FFC: Established 1883

                          Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                          Comment

                          • Desipura
                            WOOF Member
                            • Mar 2008
                            • 4344

                            #14
                            Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                            Originally posted by bornadog
                            You admire him, your willing to give him a one year contract yet he is a liability. I think you are confused.

                            Either he is good enough to get a two year contract or nothing because he is not up to it.
                            You may be happy paying Cross a nice salary playing at Williamstown or worse still limping through his last season like Hahn, Johnson and Aker.
                            I prefer to take the conservative approach given no other club would be offering him mooney in 12 months time to move clubs.

                            Comment

                            • Topdog
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 7471

                              #15
                              Re: Bulldogs lock in Matthew Boyd and Daniel Cross

                              Originally posted by bornadog
                              You admire him, your willing to give him a one year contract yet he is a liability. I think you are confused.

                              Either he is good enough to get a two year contract or nothing because he is not up to it.
                              if it is 2 years or nothing than I vote nothing. He is clearly slowing up and i agree that his 2nd year will most likely be played at Williamstown.

                              1 year contract was the way to go.

                              Comment

                              Working...