Dickson's New Deal

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Twodogs
    Moderator
    • Nov 2006
    • 27655

    #16
    Re: Dickson's New Deal

    Originally posted by Maddog37
    Will effectively be a Gia replacement. I would expect him to divide opinion just as much too.

    Good observation.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

    Comment

    • G-Mo77
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Apr 2007
      • 9876

      #17
      Re: Dickson's New Deal

      Originally posted by Maddog37
      Will effectively be a Gia replacement. I would expect him to divide opinion just as much too.
      Yep, that's the way I see it as well.

      Comment

      • Go_Dogs
        Hall of Fame
        • Jan 2007
        • 10157

        #18
        Re: Dickson's New Deal

        Originally posted by Maddog37
        Will effectively be a Gia replacement. I would expect him to divide opinion just as much too.
        Agree with that. No issue with the extension for mine.
        Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?

        Comment

        • GVGjr
          Moderator
          • Nov 2006
          • 44655

          #19
          Re: Dickson's New Deal

          He was coming out of contract so you are caught between making an offer now or potentially matching offers from other clubs later in the season.

          I'm guessing here but it sounds like he understands where he is as a footballer and I'd say he was reasonable with the money he was seeking. With those two issues out of the way, signing him early in the season seems to me to be the prudent thing to do.
          Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

          Comment

          • ReLoad
            Senior Player
            • Sep 2009
            • 1460

            #20
            Re: Dickson's New Deal

            Depth player at best, poor decision for a 2 year deal, we need to find someone and something different, and the only way we will do that is by getting kids into the squad. Not a wise decision IMHO.

            Comment

            • chef
              Hall of Fame
              • Nov 2008
              • 14624

              #21
              Re: Dickson's New Deal

              Originally posted by ReLoad
              Depth player at best, poor decision for a 2 year deal, we need to find someone and something different, and the only way we will do that is by getting kids into the squad. Not a wise decision IMHO.
              He's a polarising player isn't he, I would easily have in our best 22 and see him having a pretty good career at the Dogs.
              The curse is dead.

              Comment

              • azabob
                Hall of Fame
                • Sep 2008
                • 15321

                #22
                Re: Dickson's New Deal

                Originally posted by chef
                He's a polarising player isn't he, I would easily have in our best 22 and see him having a pretty good career at the Dogs.
                He certainly is. I agree with you, easily in our best 22 and I think he will only get better as we get better.
                More of an In Bruges guy?

                Comment

                • Throughandthrough
                  Coaching Staff
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 3201

                  #23
                  Re: Dickson's New Deal

                  I hope we didn't pay overs. Dickson's getting the best out of what he has, which isn't a lot.

                  Comment

                  • ReLoad
                    Senior Player
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 1460

                    #24
                    Re: Dickson's New Deal

                    Originally posted by chef
                    He's a polarising player isn't he, I would easily have in our best 22 and see him having a pretty good career at the Dogs.
                    Polarising indeed, I think its a pretty sad indictment of our list if he is best 22.

                    For mine he is too one paced, fades in and out of games and when he is not chasing and tackling (which happens more often than not) looks amazingly lazy.

                    Great shot for goal though.

                    Comment

                    • Maddog37
                      WOOF Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 3132

                      #25
                      Re: Dickson's New Deal

                      Originally posted by ReLoad
                      Polarising indeed, I think its a pretty sad indictment of our list if he is best 22.

                      For mine he is too one paced, fades in and out of games and when he is not chasing and tackling (which happens more often than not) looks amazingly lazy.

                      Great shot for goal though.
                      As I said, just like Gia.

                      Comment

                      • boydogs
                        WOOF Member
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 5844

                        #26
                        Re: Dickson's New Deal

                        Originally posted by Maddog37
                        As I said, just like Gia.
                        Or Paul Hudson
                        If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

                        Formerly gogriff

                        Comment

                        • Nuggety Back Pocket
                          WOOF Member
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 2064

                          #27
                          Re: Dickson's New Deal

                          Originally posted by Greystache
                          Good news. We have so few players who can impact the scoreboard and Dickson is one who can.
                          Dickson's lack of pace remains a problem. He was poor against Essendon and whilst playing well at times is inconsistent.
                          There was little need to gift him a further two year contract.
                          Gia and Dickson and Jones on the same forward makes it slow.

                          Comment

                          • Bulldog4life
                            WOOF Member
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 9607

                            #28
                            Re: Dickson's New Deal

                            I am happy with the decision of the Club. Can be a damaging player for us when we are on song.

                            Comment

                            • LostDoggy
                              WOOF Member
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 8307

                              #29
                              Re: Dickson's New Deal

                              Dickson plays really well one week or two, then appears to come up sore or jaded the next. I don't know if he is up to the rigours of AFL footy week in and week out, or if he has other issues, but if he is to be of real value to the club there has to be a much narrower gap between his best and his worst.

                              Comment

                              • Greystache
                                Bulldog Team of the Century
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 9775

                                #30
                                Re: Dickson's New Deal

                                Originally posted by Nuggety Back Pocket
                                Dickson's lack of pace remains a problem. He was poor against Essendon and whilst playing well at times is inconsistent.
                                There was little need to gift him a further two year contract.
                                Gia and Dickson and Jones on the same forward makes it slow.
                                I don't see it as a major issue as he doesn't have too much trouble getting clear on the lead inside 50m. With better delivery, better players around him, and the overall improvement of the team, along with more experience he should be able to kick 40-50 goals a season.

                                Gia will be gone at season's end at the latest, and Jones is actually the second quickest player on our list, he just doesn't lead well. I don't see either being an issue for Dickson next year or the year after (when this contract applies).
                                [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

                                Comment

                                Working...