Williamstown 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Bulldogs Bite
    Hall of Fame
    • Dec 2006
    • 11407

    #16
    Re: Williamstown 2012

    Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
    Someone will find themselves in the reserves
    That won't necessarily be a bad thing, either.

    Will be interesting to see who steps up.
    W00F!

    Comment

    • ledge
      Hall of Fame
      • Dec 2007
      • 14551

      #17
      Re: Williamstown 2012

      Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
      Someone will find themselves in the reserves
      Not a bad thing at least they get to play in the position we want them too.
      We have had a couple of players over the years go from Reserves to seniors.
      Bring back the biff

      Comment

      • Bulldog4life
        WOOF Member
        • Oct 2007
        • 9607

        #18
        Re: Williamstown 2012

        Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
        That won't necessarily be a bad thing, either.

        Will be interesting to see who steps up.
        Agree. I like the thought of guys fighting for their position in the team.

        Comment

        • GVGjr
          Moderator
          • Nov 2006
          • 45554

          #19
          Re: Williamstown 2012

          Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
          Someone will find themselves in the reserves
          Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
          That won't necessarily be a bad thing, either.

          Will be interesting to see who steps up.
          I'm a little surprised at the level of support for Bulldog listed players potentially playing in the reserves for Williamstown being seen as a good thing.
          Over the last few years there has been a lot of focus and discussion on how players like Matt Little were blocking the development of the Bulldogs listed players so it's good read that competition is healthy.
          Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

          Comment

          • Greystache
            WOOF Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 9775

            #20
            Re: Williamstown 2012

            Originally posted by GVGjr
            I'm a little surprised at the level of support for Bulldog listed players potentially playing in the reserves for Williamstown being seen as a good thing.
            Over the last few years there has been a lot of focus and discussion on how players like Matt Little were blocking the development of the Bulldogs listed players so it's good read that competition is healthy.
            For me the difference is I have no issue with a young Bulldog player keeping another young Bulldog player out of his prefered position through good form, just as I have no issue with a Bulldog player being dropped to Willi reserves to promote another young player who's done well. That sort of competition is healthy.

            I do have an issue however with young Bulldog players, in particular key position players, being kept out of the seniors by mature non-listed players who are good state level players but who will never be anything more.
            [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

            Comment

            • Sockeye Salmon
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 6365

              #21
              Re: Williamstown 2012

              Originally posted by Greystache
              For me the difference is I have no issue with a young Bulldog player keeping another young Bulldog player out of his prefered position through good form, just as I have no issue with a Bulldog player being dropped to Willi reserves to promote another young player who's done well. That sort of competition is healthy.

              I do have an issue however with young Bulldog players, in particular key position players, being kept out of the seniors by mature non-listed players who are good state level players but who will never be anything more.
              Willi is a football club in it's own right, not a Bulldogs feeder team. They are there to win premierships and if a state league player gives them the best chance to do this they are perfectly right to select the state league player.

              Comment

              • GVGjr
                Moderator
                • Nov 2006
                • 45554

                #22
                Re: Williamstown 2012

                Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                Willi is a football club in it's own right, not a Bulldogs feeder team. They are there to win premierships and if a state league player gives them the best chance to do this they are perfectly right to select the state league player.
                Agree. I don't see it as a bad thing providing we make the hard decisions on our own players as well.
                Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                Comment

                • Greystache
                  WOOF Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 9775

                  #23
                  Re: Williamstown 2012

                  Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                  Willi is a football club in it's own right, not a Bulldogs feeder team. They are there to win premierships and if a state league player gives them the best chance to do this they are perfectly right to select the state league player.
                  I'm aware of that. Their state league players have hardly taken them to glory however, they have recently been the players that have let them down most in finals.
                  [COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]

                  Comment

                  • GVGjr
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 45554

                    #24
                    Re: Williamstown 2012

                    Originally posted by Greystache
                    I'm aware of that. Their state league players have hardly taken them to glory however, they have recently been the players that have let them down most in finals.
                    I agree with what you are saying but the output by the Bulldog listed players left a lot to be desired in the GF.
                    The alliance with Williamstown is as good as we can hope for so we have to make it work and just acknowledge that from time to time the likes of a Matthew Panos will play at CHB rather than at FF.
                    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                    Comment

                    • The Bulldogs Bite
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 11407

                      #25
                      Re: Williamstown 2012

                      Originally posted by Greystache
                      For me the difference is I have no issue with a young Bulldog player keeping another young Bulldog player out of his prefered position through good form, just as I have no issue with a Bulldog player being dropped to Willi reserves to promote another young player who's done well. That sort of competition is healthy.

                      I do have an issue however with young Bulldog players, in particular key position players, being kept out of the seniors by mature non-listed players who are good state level players but who will never be anything more.
                      QFT.

                      The pup's not so small anymore Greystache!
                      W00F!

                      Comment

                      • Bulldog4life
                        WOOF Member
                        • Oct 2007
                        • 9607

                        #26
                        Re: Williamstown 2012

                        Originally posted by GVGjr
                        I agree with what you are saying but the output by the Bulldog listed players left a lot to be desired in the GF.
                        The alliance with Williamstown is as good as we can hope for so we have to make it work and just acknowledge that from time to time the likes of a Matthew Panos will play at CHB rather than at FF.
                        The way footy is going now days I think that is a good thing.

                        Comment

                        • Bulldog Revolution
                          Coaching Staff
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 3933

                          #27
                          Re: Williamstown 2012

                          I see on the Willy website that German looks to have signed a three year deal - 2012-2014 and it appears to the inexpert eye that many of the other coaching positions around him look to have been filled with new people

                          Comment

                          • LostDoggy
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 8307

                            #28
                            Re: Williamstown 2012

                            Just went for a ride down to Williamstown today, rode past Burbank oval too. When is the ground going to be used? From what I can see theres redevelopment on the stand, and new cricket nets but but not much else, assuming it won't be ready this year so Willy will be at Werribee's ground again?

                            Comment

                            • The Coon Dog
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 7579

                              #29
                              Re: Williamstown 2012

                              Originally posted by alexxx
                              Just went for a ride down to Williamstown today, rode past Burbank oval too. When is the ground going to be used? From what I can see theres redevelopment on the stand, and new cricket nets but but not much else, assuming it won't be ready this year so Willy will be at Werribee's ground again?
                              Here's the Williamstown 2012 fixture. Seems to suggest home games at Burbank Oval from round 7.

                              Willy 2012 Fixture
                              [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                              Comment

                              • LostDoggy
                                WOOF Member
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 8307

                                #30
                                Re: Williamstown 2012

                                Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                                Here's the Williamstown 2012 fixture. Seems to suggest home games at Burbank Oval from round 7.

                                Willy 2012 Fixture
                                Ah thats not bad, cheers Baz.

                                Comment

                                Working...