What's the solution?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Twodogs
    Moderator
    • Nov 2006
    • 27681

    #46
    Re: What's the solution?

    Originally posted by Topdog
    Yes he bats at either 6 or 7 for Victoria and thats the spot for Australia Im talking about.

    An older head who doesn't panick
    I haven't seen Cam White bat in the longer form for a couple if years I reckon. What's his defence like? I know he has all the shots and shot selection was pretty good so I'd have him in too.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

    Comment

    • bulldogtragic
      The List Manager
      • Jan 2007
      • 34289

      #47
      Re: What's the solution?

      Part of the successful solution is Peter Handscomb. Averaging 99.75 after 4 tests with 399 runs, with two fifties and two centuries.
      Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

      Comment

      • Twodogs
        Moderator
        • Nov 2006
        • 27681

        #48
        Re: What's the solution?

        This "bringing in batsmen who will bat properly" selection policy has been a boon.its confounded the oppossition. It's much better than that phase we went through where we were only selecting batsmen who threw their wicket away in the 20s.
        They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

        Comment

        • Topdog
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Jan 2007
          • 7483

          #49
          Re: What's the solution?

          Originally posted by bulldogtragic
          Part of the successful solution is Peter Handscomb. Averaging 99.75 after 4 tests with 399 runs, with two fifties and two centuries.
          Still hasn't lost his wicket for under 50.

          Comment

          • Twodogs
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 27681

            #50
            Re: What's the solution?

            Originally posted by Topdog
            Still hasn't lost his wicket for under 50.

            I don't know how he does it because he barely moves his feet. It should be pretty simple, keep throwing the ball up. Sure he might hit you square of the wicket for four a few times or if he's particularly good drove you down the ground but the law of averages says that eventually a ball will move a teensy bit, beat the bat and bowl him. Any sort of late movement should nick him over. But it doesn't. He just keeps motoring on and on and on smacking the ball down the ground, through square leg and somehow doesn't get bowled. He's a force of nature.
            They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

            Comment

            Working...