Shield Final

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scraggers
    Premiership Moderator
    • Jun 2008
    • 3541

    #31
    Re: Shield Final

    Originally posted by GVGjr
    It's a shame about the rain really because I'm confident that we would have beaten them anyway.
    I was confident that we would win the twenty/20 and One Day final as well ...

    Comment

    • Mantis
      Hall of Fame
      • Apr 2007
      • 15221

      #32
      Re: Shield Final

      Lunch - Day 4

      Vics all out 510

      White 135
      McKay 39*

      QLD 0/30 off 14 overs

      Slow r/r indicates the Qld'ers aren't on the hunt for quick runs.

      Comment

      • Scraggers
        Premiership Moderator
        • Jun 2008
        • 3541

        #33
        Re: Shield Final

        Originally posted by hujsh
        That'd just about get us the trophy then I'd imagine.
        Start counting ... 1 cluck cluck cluck ... 2 cluck cluck cluck ...

        Comment

        • ledge
          Hall of Fame
          • Dec 2007
          • 14033

          #34
          Re: Shield Final

          Qld four for about 100 and the ball is moving off the pitch , dont think Qld have a hope in hell.
          Bring back the biff

          Comment

          • hujsh
            Hall of Fame
            • Nov 2007
            • 11756

            #35
            Re: Shield Final

            121/6

            Giving them payback for the years before (though most of those players are now retired or playing international cricket.)
            [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

            Comment

            • Mantis
              Hall of Fame
              • Apr 2007
              • 15221

              #36
              Re: Shield Final

              All out for 200.

              Nannes 4/65

              What do we think, put them back in and try and win the game or let them rot in the field?

              Comment

              • lemmon
                Bulldog Team of the Century
                • Nov 2008
                • 6437

                #37
                Re: Shield Final

                Originally posted by Mantis
                All out for 200.

                Nannes 4/65

                What do we think, put them back in and try and win the game or let them rot in the field?
                Id have a crack and put them back in, they're not going to win it from here so lets do it comprehensively and win in 3 and a half days. Give the crowd something to watch as well.

                Comment

                • LostDoggy
                  WOOF Member
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 8307

                  #38
                  Re: Shield Final

                  Originally posted by ledge
                  gee they need 9 wickets and over 400 to win on the last day, whats the chances?
                  Little to none, except that it's Victoria and a domestic final we're talking about here. Hodgey could pull a muscle putting his pants on again, Symonds could hit the rest of his career runs in one innings.

                  Ridiculous or not, I'm holding my breath until Whitey's got his grubby mitts on the trophy.

                  (And what are the chances of Vics not being able to break into the Australian Test team until a month or two before the Shield Final, when they take our strike bowler, our leg-spinner, and our all-rounder... if you didn't know better you'd think it was a conspiracy. If Siddle, McGain and McDonald get dropped from the Test squad and sent home after the Shield Final it would confirm it!)

                  ps. Taking nothing away from Phil Hughes - I don't think it's a particularly unreasonable or paranoid charge to say that if Rogers were playing for NSW this year, he would already be opening for Australia.

                  Comment

                  • Mantis
                    Hall of Fame
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 15221

                    #39
                    Re: Shield Final

                    Contrary to what I have posted on enforcing the follow on in the past I would have definitely done it on this occassion. After losing so much time to rain we were never in a position to lose the game, add to this the massive first innings score plus the piss poor batting efforts from the Qld'ers, why not go for the win?

                    There is no better feeling than winning a final by taking the final wicket or by scoring the winning run, a far better feeling than winning the game by it simply being called off.

                    Comment

                    • hujsh
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 11756

                      #40
                      Re: Shield Final

                      Should have enforced the follow on. As Mantis said QLD won't win and I think we should make it a comprehensive victory
                      [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                      Comment

                      • lemmon
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 6437

                        #41
                        Re: Shield Final

                        Not sure why we didnt enforce the follow on. Would've much preffered to see us lift the trophy comprehensively with a win.

                        Comment

                        • Sockeye Salmon
                          Bulldog Team of the Century
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 6365

                          #42
                          Re: Shield Final

                          I'm the most emphatic non-follow-onerer on WOOF and even i would have made them follow on.

                          We couldn't lose either way, we may as well have won the game.

                          Comment

                          • LostDoggy
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 8307

                            #43
                            Re: Shield Final

                            Reason given for not enforcing follow-on was that Nannes et al were carrying niggles (that made them miss the last couple of games), a break would freshen them up for a second innings tilt.

                            (Of course, they did bowl only something like 60 overs, and they were getting a whole evening to put their feet up anyway.. don't know what a couple of hours more rest is supposed to achieve...)

                            Comment

                            • Mantis
                              Hall of Fame
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 15221

                              #44
                              Re: Shield Final

                              Originally posted by Lantern
                              Reason given for not enforcing follow-on was that Nannes et al were carrying niggles (that made them miss the last couple of games), a break would freshen them up for a second innings tilt.

                              (Of course, they did bowl only something like 60 overs, and they were getting a whole evening to put their feet up anyway.. don't know what a couple of hours more rest is supposed to achieve...)
                              There is no way in the world you would ask QLD to bat again in this game.

                              Comment

                              • LostDoggy
                                WOOF Member
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 8307

                                #45
                                Re: Shield Final

                                They were thinking about it -- maybe two sessions or so with a lead of 500. Try to bowl them out.

                                It's a moot point with the rain now though. I'm almost ready to celebrate the win.. almost.

                                Comment

                                Working...