Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
Collapse
X
-
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023 -
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
Great post Soupaman. I think the pre-draft picks (access to the 17yo's) also favoured the Giants...again, this is even more of a chook raffle because trying to figure out how 18yo's will react to being moved interstate is hard enough, let alone 17yo's.
GC didn't really stuff up except in one area - they picked mature age players with a flawed idea that having Ablett etc would enable them to play finals 'quickly' based on surrounding a few experienced heads with the best kids. The Giants watched and learned and spent their money 'less wisely' in many ways, betting on some kids (such as Ward) who were young and had shown 'something' but had hardly proved they were ready to play a key role in a premiership team (arguable with Ward I guess). They have also been pretty happy to 'trade out' players (Tyson etc) who had shown a bit in limited time to go back to the draft well again and again in order to find a pot of gold.
I am not as worried about the scourge of the Giants as everyone seems to be. It is very (very) hard to win a flag, they play bugger all games at the 'G, there is no guarantee they will get a home final at Spotless (ANZ anyone?) and the McCarthy situation will be played out (not to the same level I admit) with more players as time goes by...yes, they have a bigger salary cap but it wont be big enough to keep them all...and whilst that probably means trades and more draft picks replacing 23 year old 'guns' with 18 year old unproven kids has never, ever been a recipe for premierships.What should I tell her? She's going to ask.Comment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
I expect it to appear pretty much word for word in the paper soon claimed by some journalist as their work.They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
Outstanding work . I bet one of those lazy hack immensely untalented Afl writers picks this upComment
-
Comment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
I am surprised at how low key the introduction of the development zones scheme has been and how little we've heard about it.
I'm not sure exactly how it works, but what I do know is that Luke Ball is co-ordinating it from the AFL's perspective, and that the Bulldogs have a part time resource in Dalrymple's team working on it.Comment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
It's time zones came back . At least so people of the area can support people of the area and have some recognition of the club and its origins.
We go on about having the biggest area and supporter base but means nothing if the kid that people watched play go to GWS.
We need some sort of zone rule where you get first choice on two players in your area first.Bring back the biffComment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
Yeah, but the western suburbs of Melbourne isn't going to be a zone...they are talking about regional areas particularly ones in non-footy areas. This is why there is so much controversy over the Giants as the Riverina could (and prob should) be considered a 'footy' area and they have full access to it.What should I tell her? She's going to ask.Comment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
Without knowing all the intricacies and cost etc i thought we were one of the better positioned clubs to take advantage of it
There's really no could or should about it as far as i'm concerened, the Riverina is and always has been a footy area, it's an absolute disgrace that it is included in gws academy zone so about par for the course for the AFELMy life is a very complicated drinking game.Comment
-
Re: Gold Coast Suns - Scott Clayton
Yeah, but the western suburbs of Melbourne isn't going to be a zone...they are talking about regional areas particularly ones in non-footy areas. This is why there is so much controversy over the Giants as the Riverina could (and prob should) be considered a 'footy' area and they have full access to it.My understanding was that we would have a fair chunk of the western suburbs as well as some regional zones and the academies are more for developing indigenous and recent arrivals to the country etc? I could be wrong but that was how i understood it.
Without knowing all the intricacies and cost etc i thought we were one of the better positioned clubs to take advantage of it
There's really no could or should about it as far as i'm concerened, the Riverina is and always has been a footy area, it's an absolute disgrace that it is included in gws academy zone so about par for the course for the AFELThey say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
Comment