MRO Thread

[Bornadog]

Re: MRO Thread

Disgraceful decision. Last week much worse, pleads guilty and gets a fine.
This week, it’s not even clear he did anything worth more than a free and they make it up as they go along and over-correct because of not suspending him last week.
The giants should absolutely appeal this nonsense.

great decision the player is a slime bag

the whole system is a farce, but this decision makes me feel good .

PS: Ozza, I am talking from emotion and not having a go at your logic.

[Grantysghost]

Re: MRO Thread

Giants appealing. Be interested to know what the basis for the appeal is.

Link

[Hotdog60]

Re: MRO Thread

Lets hope they fail and he gets two weeks just because I don't like him.

[Rocket Science]

Re: MRO Thread

Assuming the appeal gets squashed ... the only thing better than GWS failing in another prelim is them failing by the approximate margin of a typical Greene contribution.

I want to see Leon, Phil and Co. continue to defend the selfish, recalcitrant prick after his deranged f*ckwittery costs them a berth in a granny.

Let me put my feet up while you tell me all about how you don't want Toby to go changin' the way he goes about it THEN, wankers.

[Bulldog4life]

Re: MRO Thread

He's spot on, the past indiscretions have been dealt with

I suggest that Adrian Anderson has run rings around the AFL again

Well they have changed their tune for the AFL's love child.. This is what was reported with one of Big Red's suspensions.

On Monday, the Match Review Panel had found Redpath guilty of striking Davis intentionally to the head with low impact, with a previous bad record stretching his ban to two matches — with an early guilty plea.

[Axe Man]

Re: MRO Thread

Well they have changed their tune for the AFL's love child.. This is what was reported with one of Big Red's suspensions.

On Monday, the Match Review Panel had found Redpath guilty of striking Davis intentionally to the head with low impact, with a previous bad record stretching his ban to two matches — with an early guilty plea.

That's because they changed the rules a couple of years ago and did away with carryover points.

The Greenes and Cunningtons of the league are now free to commit what are deemed fine worthy offences to their hearts (and wallets) content.

[Mofra]

Re: MRO Thread

Just because the AFL made a mistake last week, I don't see why they should be forced to repeat it.
Greene's ban should stand.

[Bulldog4life]

Re: MRO Thread

That's because they changed the rules a couple of years ago and did away with carryover points.

The Greenes and Cunningtons of the league are now free to commit what are deemed fine worthy offences to their hearts (and wallets) content.

Thanks for that Axe. So a sniper now can just now keep on sniping and his bad record is never taken into account. How ridiculous.

[Murphy'sLore]

Re: MRO Thread

It's almost like they did this with Toby Greene in mind!!??

Gobsmacking!

Still haven't heard back from Gillon, by the way.

[Bornadog]

Re: MRO Thread

That's because they changed the rules a couple of years ago and did away with carryover points.

The Greenes and Cunningtons of the league are now free to commit what are deemed fine worthy offences to their hearts (and wallets) content.

Which is so wrong. Previous record should be taken into account, just like any law court.

[Jeanette54]

Re: MRO Thread

Which is so wrong. Previous record should be taken into account, just like any law court.

Of course in court it is only taken into account for the purposes of sentencing. No mention is made of any record prior to establishing whether the accused is guilty or innocent for the charges being heard. .

[Rocket Science]

Re: MRO Thread

Appeal quashed!

I'd be furious if I was the Giants.

But I'm not, so ...

[Scraggers]

Re: MRO Thread

If that got a week, the Bontempelli incident was worth five !!!

[Grantysghost]

Re: MRO Thread

[Twodogs]

Re: MRO Thread

If that got a week, the Bontempelli incident was worth five !!!

We've been waiting four weeks to say that!