If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Unfortunately the AFL signed off the Bombers travel arrangements beforehand which closes the door somewhat for them. I expect on Monday the Saints might ask them to review it again
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
So you don't like any of the rule changes they have brought in over the last 140 years?
Yes there has been so many so there might be a couple.
The short kick rule in the 1800s.
They harp on all the time about how it's the best game, yet they continually try to change it.
Yes there has been so many so there might be a couple.
The short kick rule in the 1800s.
They harp on all the time about how it's the best game, yet they continually try to change it.
Good point Chops, problem with Aussie rules is too many rules and too many 50/50 rules.
Soccer and cricket are pretty straight forward rules and nowhere near as many.
Just announced on Fox that St Kilda will get the four points due to the Bombres no-show in Wang. Apparently they think the NAB Cup is just as important as the Premiership season.
[B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]
Sham cup??? loved it! I'll watch us beat Carlton any time of the year.
You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus
Why do we have to trial anything?
For gods sake people, why do we have to change this game, what is wrong with it?
Watching the game tonight with these ridiculous rules makes it the Sham Cup. Its so frustrating.
People said that about the advantage rule they also said the same thing about waiting for the goal umpires to put the flags away before you were allowed to kick in after a point. They also put a line across the centre square after watching two ruckman spend the better part of every game just wrestling and they also put a centre square to open up the middle of the ground rather than having 36 players at the fall of every contest.
They get some right and they get some wrong but you obviously think the game is purring along at a 100%. The NAB cup is where I would prefer the AFL rules committee to try new rules and even if they get a few wrong it's still the right spot to give them a go.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
People said that about the advantage rule they also said the same thing about waiting for the goal umpires to put the flags away before you were allowed to kick in after a point. They also put a line across the centre square after watching two ruckman spend the better part of every game just wrestling and they also put a centre square to open up the middle of the ground rather than having 36 players at the fall of every contest.
They get some right and they get some wrong but you obviously think the game is purring along at a 100%. The NAB cup is where I would prefer the AFL rules committee to try new rules and even if they get a few wrong it's still the right spot to give them a go.
The only one they got right was the centre square, the rest I am dead against.
No one can answer, whats wrong with the game and we have to continually change things?
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
The only one they got right was the centre square, the rest I am dead against.
No one can answer, whats wrong with the game and we have to continually change things?
The game is OK now based on the fact that things like the advantage rule and the line separating the ruckman have worked. It's no longer a constant dour struggle.
I think they are also on a winner with the sub even though I was originally against it.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
Comment