Round 1 2016 team

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 66843

    Re: Round 1 2016 team

    Sandilands out:

    Fremantle's Aaron Sandilands has accepted a one-match ban for rough conduct, ruling him out of the Dockers' season opener against the Western Bulldogs.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • F'scary
      WOOF Member
      • Dec 2011
      • 4089

      Re: Round 1 2016 team

      Originally posted by dukedog
      What is the reasoning for libba goin via vfl.? Physically not ready?. Mentally?
      Physical - I just keep remembering Clay's comebacks.
      Officially on the Bus-wagon

      Comment

      • Rocco Jones
        Bulldog Team of the Century
        • Jun 2008
        • 6932

        Re: Round 1 2016 team

        Originally posted by F'scary
        Physical - I just keep remembering Clay's comebacks.
        Clay has re-injured the knee twice. Once at AFL level, once at VFL level.

        Comment

        • dukedog
          WOOF Member
          • Dec 2014
          • 355

          Re: Round 1 2016 team

          Im still not convinced that the level of game you play in makes a difference. If the knee is ready to go its ready to go. In saying this im no expert... just think the doctors would say your ready or your not.

          Comment

          • LostDoggy
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 8307

            Re: Round 1 2016 team

            Originally posted by dukedog
            Im still not convinced that the level of game you play in makes a difference. If the knee is ready to go its ready to go. In saying this im no expert... just think the doctors would say your ready or your not.
            Tend to agree, given VFL games are probably by and large played on inferior surfaces, there's a fair argument to say they pose greater risk for a knee injury.

            Comment

            • Rocco Jones
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jun 2008
              • 6932

              Re: Round 1 2016 team

              Originally posted by dukedog
              Im still not convinced that the level of game you play in makes a difference. If the knee is ready to go its ready to go. In saying this im no expert... just think the doctors would say your ready or your not.
              Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
              Tend to agree, given VFL games are probably by and large played on inferior surfaces, there's a fair argument to say they pose greater risk for a knee injury.
              Absolutely. If we are going to rest him, rest him.

              Comment

              • LostDoggy
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 8307

                Re: Round 1 2016 team



                We've certainly got less issues than Freo. Aside from Sandilands a definite out, the above article has Mundy and Ballantyne as proppy at present (and Bennell and Pearce have only joined the main group at training this week). R1 was certainly the time to get them.

                Comment

                • BornInDroopSt'54
                  Bulldog Team of the Century
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 5286

                  Re: Round 1 2016 team

                  Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
                  http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-2...nee-specialist

                  We've certainly got less issues than Freo. Aside from Sandilands a definite out, the above article has Mundy and Ballantyne as proppy at present (and Bennell and Pearce have only joined the main group at training this week). R1 was certainly the time to get them.
                  Rnd 1 means Ross Lyon will have had ample time to analyse how to counter us. If we play our way there may not be a counter.
                  Footscray Football Republic.

                  Comment

                  • Mofra
                    Hall of Fame
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 14979

                    Re: Round 1 2016 team

                    Originally posted by BornInDroopSt'54
                    Rnd 1 means Ross Lyon will have had ample time to analyse how to counter us. If we play our way there may not be a counter.
                    If fast ball movement really is going to be a hallmark of our style we may find a way to fit all of Caleb Daniel, McLean and Hunter into the same side.
                    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                    Comment

                    • GVGjr
                      Moderator
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 44711

                      Re: Round 1 2016 team

                      With Sandilands out of the game does that strengthen the chance of Roughead being the first ruck?

                      Who would be the likely match-up on Pavlich?
                      Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                      Comment

                      • bulldogtragic
                        The List Manager
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 34289

                        Re: Round 1 2016 team

                        Originally posted by GVGjr
                        With Sandilands out of the game does that strengthen the chance of Roughead being the first ruck?

                        Who would be the likely match-up on Pavlich?
                        Roughead could be, I guess. Zac Clarke rests forward a fair bit, is there such thing as a tagger/tagging ruck?

                        I think we have to use our best defender on Pav, so that's Dale M.
                        Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                        Comment

                        • merantau
                          Coaching Staff
                          • May 2015
                          • 4070

                          Re: Round 1 2016 team

                          Have just had another look at Rocco's initial round one team. Looks pretty good to me. At this stage I'd say 18 of his 22 are locked in. With Crameri unavailable that leaves three more spots up for grabs. Roughie's spot must be under a bit of pressure from Campbell. If Campbell is in then either Roberts or Hamling must play. Suckling must come into the side. Perhaps Adcock will get the call-up for Crameri. Glad I'm not on the match committee - it will be burning the midnight oil for sure. I wouldn't be surprised to see Collins get the call-up.
                          [URL="http://journals.worldnomads.com/merantau"]http://journals.worldnomads.com/merantau[/URL]
                          "It's not about the destination - it's about the trip."

                          Comment

                          • Rocco Jones
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Jun 2008
                            • 6932

                            Re: Round 1 2016 team

                            I wouldn't let Sandi being out affect our call on the ruck. I think we should play our best 1st ruck regardless every week and match them with a 2nd ruck who can compete when relieving but primarily earn their spot as a forward.

                            I see Campbell or Minson as our only options at the moment as 1st ruck. Roughy doesn't offer enough around the ground to make up for gap in tap work.

                            IMO Will is more best tap ruckman. Campbell has him covered in being a 'team player' around the ground if that makes sense. Tom clearly edges him up forward which means he can give 2nd ruck a bit more freedom.

                            I think Campbell/Roughy combo are suited together as Campbell's ability to play forward means Roughy can spend more time in ruck if he is struggling forward.

                            Minson and Redpath/T Boyd more suited as Will is as 1D ruck as it gets. Redpath/ T Boyd to play forward and just relieve Will when need.

                            Injury aside, Redpath has earned his spot in the side as a key-forward and with no Crameri, I believe we will go with an extra tall forward/2nd ruck.

                            Comment

                            • Rocco Jones
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jun 2008
                              • 6932

                              Re: Round 1 2016 team

                              Structurally, I think a true 1st ruckman + 2 key-forwards who can both relieve in the ruck is ideal however key-position players/ruck is clearly our weakness and we are strong depth in runners. If Roughy/T Boyd are a liability, we probably will have to go with 1 key-forward who then relieves in the ruck, allowing us to play an extra runner. Perhaps ensuring we go for another bigger bodied mid who can compete physically up forward, Jong is a good example.

                              Comment

                              • LostDoggy
                                WOOF Member
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 8307

                                Re: Round 1 2016 team

                                With 4 interchange players again I think we can afford to just rest Minson on the bench for 5-7 minutes a quarter. Don't want him anywhere near the forward line!

                                I would start with Minson as number 1 ruck with Boyd and Redpath up forward. Boyd to be the 2nd ruckmen. Minson goes to the bench and we play with a small forward line for that time.

                                If Boyd isn't fit/ready to go we probably have to go in with Tommy C. Whilst it's not ideal playing him and Will in the same side he has shown he can make an impact up forward..

                                Some huge decisions to be made that's for sure...

                                Comment

                                Working...