The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

[hujsh]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

You are spot on.

COLA should still be in play, it just should be handled by the AFL.

But not Sydney exclusive (maybe players under 150K get their wages adjusted to local inflation/property prices)

[Topdog]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

But not Sydney exclusive (maybe players under 150K get their wages adjusted to local inflation/property prices)

YES! WA are equally (if not more) impacted.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Hello.....

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/rich...831bdbd250ee7a

Lids mentioned throughout the year that teammates were hanging shit on him (not needing to care about rebuilding etc) because he was going to be a Bulldogs player next year...

[comrade]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Not overly fussed on Lids. Can someone convince me he's a must have?

[GVGjr]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Hello.....

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/rich...831bdbd250ee7a

Interesting. Given what the AFL has done for Geelong it still puts them in the best place to get him.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Not overly fussed on Lids. Can someone convince me he's a must have?

His $800,000 reported salary is a concern. Geelong allowed to trade another first rounder, that'd get the job done for them you'd think.

[GVGjr]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

His $800,000 reported salary is a concern. Geelong allowed to trade another first rounder, that'd get the job done for them you'd think.

Geelong are stretched further than most teams for salary cap space as is GWS which indicates that the Tigers are prepared to do something similar to what we did with Griffen and pay some of salary.

We probably don't need a lot of assistance in that area but that could also help us in negotiating a slightly lesser deal to satisfy Richmond.

[bulldogtragic]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Geelong are stretched further than most teams for salary cap space as is GWS which indicates that the Tigers are prepared to do something similar to what we did with Griffen and pay some of salary.

We probably don't need a lot of assistance in that area but that could also help us in negotiating a slightly lesser deal to satisfy Richmond.

What do you rate him pick wise?

[Remi Moses]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

It's being reported from Emma Quayle that the cats are willing to give up a first for Tuohy.
Is that their first pick in 2020?

[1eyedog]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Not overly fussed on Lids. Can someone convince me he's a must have?

No. He's good but not worth the coin he's commanding. Would rather develop Bailey Williams who has looked very promising. Other than this year Lid's has been durable but he's got 2-3 years left. Not sure I want to give away our first rounder for that. I'd offer Richmond the Hamling pick and they'd laugh at me and we can all move on.

Did I just read right? A first round selection for Tuohy?

[Axe Man]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Richmond's list manager has confirmed that GWS is the only club at this point expressing an interest in Deledio.

If we are interested we haven't told Richmond about it yet.

[GVGjr]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

What do you rate him pick wise?

It's all speculative because of GWS and what the AFL have done for Geelong but I've just done some sums. I think he is worth a late first round pick and I doubt Richmond would let him go for much less.
Our first round pick (18) is worth 985 points which would have us relying on a deal for Hrovat to get us a pick in the 2nd round to go with pick 35. 3 picks inside of 43 isn't a great position if we lost pick 18.

Could we get a discount given we probably don't need assistance to absorb his contract?
If so, I did some sums on a flip flop of picks which improves our draft order a bit from the scenario above.

The Tigers also need a pick for Caddy which could complicate things.

Looks very unlikely.

[G-Mo77]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Emma Quayle @emmasq

Dogs onballer Nathan Hrovat is off to the Roos, for a swap of picks. Blues also had interest. Will get lodged in the morning @agerealfooty

Upgrade from 43 to 32 or 33?

Again disappointing result if that's all the return is.

[comrade]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Emma Quayle @emmasq

Dogs onballer Nathan Hrovat is off to the Roos, for a swap of picks. Blues also had interest. Will get lodged in the morning @agerealfooty

Upgrade from 43 to 32 or 33?

Again disappointing result if that's all the return is.

Yep, a pittance. Should have shipped him off last year when GWS were keen.

He'll carve out a solid career, but given North are mile away, it shouldn't come back to haunt us.

[G-Mo77]

Re: The Moving Rolling De-Listing/Trading Thread 2016

Yep, a pittance. Should have shipped him off last year when GWS were keen.

He'll carve out a solid career, but given North are mile away, it shouldn't come back to haunt us.

It's yet to be confirmed, all signs point to it though. This is one deal we were not over a barrel on so I'm really disappointed if this is all it turns out to be. Fail.

And Kobe will go for virtually nothing I'm guessing.