Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

[Go_Dogs]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Out: Smith, Vandermeer, Jong (all injured)

In: Hunter, Butler, Hayes

Big outs - all three have had great moments and are important players with their speed and points of difference.

[GVGjr]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

I don't mind the no risk approach with concussions, but it's a real shame if Smith and Vandermeer have to miss, particularly the latter who was having a pretty incredible game up until his incident. Still we suddenly look very deep again so won't mind them being spelled.

I'd bring in Cavarra ahead of Weightman and Hayes. Get a terrible feeling we're going to get Gowers though.

If you look at the emergencies for the North game then Gowers must be a big chance

[EasternWest]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

If you look at the emergencies for the North game then Gowers must be a big chance

Please no

[GVGjr]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Please no

He wouldn't be my preference. Butler makes sense but with Wood coming back we are chock full of defenders

[comrade]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Please no

Yeah, why can't GVG let us just bask in the sunshine of our win and enjoy our Sunday?

Any Gowers talk can be left until Monday, surely?

[soupman]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

I just want to say how much I miss Always Right.

He'd relish this game. To his young fella who still posts on this board, thankfully, mate what a legend your dad was.

He loved it when faux tough guys got put in their place and Norf were right up there for fauxghness.

I'm not quite a young fella anymore but.

[Mantis]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Reports are that Crozier has been a 1 week ban for the sling tackle.

Like how?

[bulldogsthru&thru]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Reports are that Crozier has been a 1 week ban for the sling tackle.

Like how?

Yep 1 week. Because it’s the AFL and they have no idea why they make the decisions they do

[The Adelaide Connection]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Reports are that Crozier has been a 1 week ban for the sling tackle.

Like how?

Has to be challenged, surely? It’s been classed as medium impact. Medium. How?

[comrade]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Arms weren't pinned, tackle was completed in 1 action. Absolute BS.

[bulldogsthru&thru]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

And Burgoyne got a fine for much worse.

[GVGjr]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Arms weren't pinned, tackle was completed in 1 action. Absolute BS.

Tackled his opponent around the waist but there was medium impact with the player coming off the ground.
It's close but he should not get a week

[comrade]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Tackled his opponent around the waist but there was medium impact with the player coming off the ground.
It's close but he should not get a week

It didn't linger, the opponent wasn't dumped after he got rid of the ball, it was all done while the NM player had the ball.

I hope we challenge.

[Bulldog Joe]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

It didn't linger, the opponent wasn't dumped after he got rid of the ball, it was all done while the NM player had the ball.

I hope we challenge.

We never challenge and it is the outcome I expected. The only player of ours that could get away with it wears number 4.

There is a profile element in every MRO decision.

He did sling and the North player had a cut above the eye from hitting his head on the ground.

I can't see where we really have anything to challenge.

[Grantysghost]

Re: Always Right Match Committee Vs Carlton Round 6 2020

Arms weren't pinned, tackle was completed in 1 action. Absolute BS.

Its chooklotto