If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If he says stupid things like 'checkside' then best not listening too him. It is a BANANA for goodness sake. The kick is shaped like a banana - a three year old immediately understands the concept...what does 'check side' even mean?
'Check-side' is a term bastardised from its original use in snooker which, along with its sister term 'running-side', describes the concept of the type of side-spin one can impart on a cue ball.
A check-side spin causes a cue ball to narrow the angle of rebound (compared to if there was no sidespin on the ball) and slow up after it hits the cushion.
('Running-side' spin, on the other hand, causes the cue ball to rebound wider and also speed up when compared to the normal reaction of a cue ball without said sidespin.)
If I were to hazard a guess, the bastardised version of the term would have become common usage in football to allude to the fact that you have to kick the ball with some level of sidespin in order to make it curve in the air.
'Check-side' is a term bastardised from its original use in snooker which, along with its sister term 'running-side', describes the concept of the type of side-spin one can impart on a cue ball.
A check-side spin causes a cue ball to narrow the angle of rebound (compared to if there was no sidespin on the ball) and slow up after it hits the cushion.
('Running-side' spin, on the other hand, causes the cue ball to rebound wider and also speed up when compared to the normal reaction of a cue ball without said sidespin.)
If I were to hazard a guess, the bastardised version of the term would have become common usage in football to allude to the fact that you have to kick the ball with some level of sidespin in order to make it curve in the air.
Yeah, what he said ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's the gist of the explanation I got when I was a junior...
[B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]
The inside – outside analysis is almost 20 years out of date.
Terry Wheeler had the idea when he coached the club of insiders (in and under players) who won contested ball in packs; Axe, Libba and Wally and shoveled it out to skilled players in space like Leon Cameron who then distributed it with great aplomb to attacking moves. He would have different ideas today but that was his analysis then.
This was fine until coaches started to realize that if you hunted the receiver of such efforts you didn’t have to win the ball yourself or could negate the advantage so gained. Today they also clog up space by having strategic patterns around stoppages etc. In fact Smith when he coached Melbourne in the late 50s initiated this at throw ins.
That is why today’s football is not so easily described as insiders and outsiders because both Cooney and Griff are usually under great pressure when they receive the ball and need to duck and weave to get space to distribute. They are not any longer outsiders, not only because they have very little space on receipt of the pill but also because they play a role in extracting the pill in the first place in certain situations.
I would argue that there are two sorts of insider players these days; the first are the ball winners in our case typified by Crossie and Boyd and the pack breakers like Coon and Griff, but both roles are interchangeable. Especially when they play ring a rosie handball in packs looking for an openning and by the time they find one it might be the player who won the ball who also ends up breaking free with it, just watch what the cats do.
As for outside players, well Terry Wallace wanted a team full of runners in which everyone became an offensive threat at certain times and this trend continues, so it’s hard to think who isn’t an outside player; it depends on how and where the ball is won, and how it moves.
I don’t think anybody stands back and says my role is purely defensive I won’t get involved in this attacking move by making space to receive and move the ball on.
The inside – outside analysis is almost 20 years out of date.
Yeah - but so is the concept of around about 12 positions on the ground. Doesn't stop people calling for player 'x' to play on the wing when no-one does that anymore.
"The modern game" - The term loved by commentators and despised by me. Just when exactly did footy become 'the modern game' and why wasn't I told at the time? And what the hell was I watching before footy became 'the modern game'? It felt pretty modern at the time but it never pranced around with 'the modern game' label like we have to suffer through now.
'The modern game' is wheeled out by fools whenever they feel the need to explain what is happening when two ordinary teams with ordinary skills and ordinary coaches meet and play an ordinary brand of football. That's been happening for one hundred years; so why only now do we blame the present?
Seriously, when did 'the modern game' start? It can't be when players stopped holding position and started filling space because that's been happening for more than a decade and surely it isn't that modern any more.
"The modern game" - The term loved by commentators and despised by me. Just when exactly did footy become 'the modern game' and why wasn't I told at the time? And what the hell was I watching before footy became 'the modern game'? It felt pretty modern at the time but it never pranced around with 'the modern game' label like we have to suffer through now.
'The modern game' is wheeled out by fools whenever they feel the need to explain what is happening when two ordinary teams with ordinary skills and ordinary coaches meet and play an ordinary brand of football. That's been happening for one hundred years; so why only now do we blame the present?
Seriously, when did 'the modern game' start? It can't be when players stopped holding position and started filling space because that's been happening for more than a decade and surely it isn't that modern any more.
Shortly after a certain G Healy was allowed out of where ever he had been put for safekeeping and allowed behind a microphone.
[I]I believe there's nothing on this earth that we own. All we do is look after it for our children - Terry Wheeler[/I]
Comment