Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

[Mantis]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

It would allow to be more of an opportunist forward. We all know the more kicks he gets, the more likely it result in either a scoring assist or a goal.

In a defensive role you would still want Gia to work off Shaw to gain possessions and give us some creativity.

[Desipura]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

In a defensive role you would still want Gia to work off Shaw to gain possessions and give us some creativity.

I would, however he was not too creative against them last time, did not get much of the footy at all.

[Mantis]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

I would, however he was not too creative against them last time, did not get much of the footy at all.

Was that because of the role he was playing or because for the first 3 quarters in that particular game we struggled getting the ball forward of centre?

[Desipura]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

Was that because of the role he was playing or because for the first 3 quarters in that particular game we struggled getting the ball forward of centre?

Both

[Bornadog]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

Eade is contemplating playing one ruck according to a report in the Age. With the expected rain, this could happen.

[LostDoggy]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

Dre was surprisingly good in the wet in Adelaide for a guy supposedly lacking in intensity.
I would be very tempted to play him .
Cant help thinking he might offer more than mitch against the faster pies, even if it is wet.

btw someone on bf posted this vidio of our youngsters in the wet vs Adelaide -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFxZD_Jyktc

[PaddyWhack]

Re: Qualifying Final - WOOF Selection Table

Courtesy of afl.com.au:

Ins: Minson, Higgins, Johnson, Wood
Outs; Moles, Everitt, Jones, Roughead

No presti for pies either.