He has had a great season, but he will be 32 when the 2011 season starts and likely to be in decline. 2010 taught us nothing if not that a good season does not guarantee another next year when you are north of 30.
The proposed interchange rule changes make it an even bigger disadvantage to have 2 specialist ruckmen such as Hudson and Minson. Roughead is a lot better around the ground, and we can expect more from Minson next year without the soy milk debacle ruining his pre-season
Some posters are suggesting a Minson trade, but then what do we do in 2012 or 2013 when Hudson is likely to be gone? Roughead & Cordy would still be very young to be shouldering the load alone.
Retiring Hudson would prevent us from keeping Roughead and possibly Cordy at some stage out of the side, slowing their development. It would free some room in the cap to invest elsewhere to address key needs.
We may need Williams, Everitt or a new recruit backup behind Minson & Roughead, but those options would be more versatile than Hudson, which will allow us to compete in terms of running power with any interchange restrictions in place.
Thoughts?
I think we are probably better off holding him until Cordy is an option, but I think there are some valid questions raised here that have not been discussed
The proposed interchange rule changes make it an even bigger disadvantage to have 2 specialist ruckmen such as Hudson and Minson. Roughead is a lot better around the ground, and we can expect more from Minson next year without the soy milk debacle ruining his pre-season
Some posters are suggesting a Minson trade, but then what do we do in 2012 or 2013 when Hudson is likely to be gone? Roughead & Cordy would still be very young to be shouldering the load alone.
Retiring Hudson would prevent us from keeping Roughead and possibly Cordy at some stage out of the side, slowing their development. It would free some room in the cap to invest elsewhere to address key needs.
We may need Williams, Everitt or a new recruit backup behind Minson & Roughead, but those options would be more versatile than Hudson, which will allow us to compete in terms of running power with any interchange restrictions in place.
Thoughts?
I think we are probably better off holding him until Cordy is an option, but I think there are some valid questions raised here that have not been discussed
Comment