Jones Vs Stanley

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • F'scary
    WOOF Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 4089

    #31
    Re: Jones Vs Stanley

    Originally posted by Testekill
    Geelong wanted to play silly buggers by delisting and rookieing Hamling. Hamling didn't want to be a rookie because it's literally luck of the draw if someone gets a LTI and there is much more security with a guaranteed contract as opposed to being rookied.
    Interesting, can I ask about the source of this info - or is it more of a reasonable hunch? I can see that they might have tried to go down this path. It would not be the first time a club has tried this with a player that has some potential but is not quite there or behind a few others at that point in time.
    Officially on the Bus-wagon

    Comment

    • Testekill
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2015
      • 2327

      #32
      Re: Jones Vs Stanley

      Originally posted by F'scary
      Interesting, can I ask about the source of this info - or is it more of a reasonable hunch? I can see that they might have tried to go down this path. It would not be the first time a club has tried this with a player that has some potential but is not quite there or behind a few others at that point in time.
      It comes from the types who "have contacts at the club" so I can't really verify how true it is but I heard from more than a few people when we recruited him that Geelong were impressed by his improvement and wanted him to stick around as a rookie.

      So it could be bull since anyone can say that they have contacts but I've heard it from more than a few people which gives it at least a little bit of weight.

      Comment

      • Remi Moses
        WOOF Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 14785

        #33
        Re: Jones Vs Stanley

        It's common practice to promise a rookie pick.
        Wouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility.

        Comment

        • F'scary
          WOOF Member
          • Dec 2011
          • 4089

          #34
          Re: Jones Vs Stanley

          Originally posted by Testekill
          It comes from the types who "have contacts at the club" so I can't really verify how true it is but I heard from more than a few people when we recruited him that Geelong were impressed by his improvement and wanted him to stick around as a rookie.

          So it could be bull since anyone can say that they have contacts but I've heard it from more than a few people which gives it at least a little bit of weight.
          It rings true with me.
          Officially on the Bus-wagon

          Comment

          • jeemak
            Bulldog Legend
            • Oct 2010
            • 22154

            #35
            Re: Jones Vs Stanley

            These sorts of comparisons tend to fade out as the 1st of March comes along. Then after a couple of misleading preseason efforts they grow some more legs. Give it eight to twelve weeks into the season and you might have a genuine comparison on your hands.
            TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

            Comment

            Working...