Rookies to be included in trade week

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Coon Dog
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 7575

    Rookies to be included in trade week

    Rookies to be included in trade week

    By Mic Cullen 6:07 PM Thu 20 August, 2009

    THE AFL has moved to allow rookies to be part of trade week to encourage more movement of players between clubs post-season.

    The AFL Commission approved the AFL and AFLPA Player Movement Working Party's recommendation that clubs should be able to include rookie list players as part of any trade.

    As part of the changes to the player rules, any rookie player who is included in a trade must be placed on the senior list of the club to which he is traded.

    Also, clubs may now count a post-season rookie upgrade – from the rookie list to the senior list – as one of their three compulsory changes to the senior list.

    This change is designed to provide clubs more flexibility in their list given the recent change to draft age and the forthcoming draft concessions provided to the Gold Coast Football Club.



    Rest of article...
    [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]
  • comrade
    Hall of Fame
    • Jun 2008
    • 17847

    #2
    Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

    I think it's a positive move - if we decide not to elevate some of our second year rookies, I hope they can get a chance elsewhere.
    Last edited by comrade; 20-08-2009, 08:57 PM.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

    Comment

    • Sockeye Salmon
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jan 2007
      • 6365

      #3
      Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

      That is interesting.

      We could, if we so choose:

      Delist Wight, Skipper, O'Shea
      Retire Welsh & Eagleton
      Trade O'Keefe
      = 6 out

      Elevate Picken, Shaw, Mulligan
      Trade for Hall
      = 4 in

      And go into the draft with just 2 picks.



      /// Not saying that this is what I would do or what I think Eade would do, just that it is now possible. ///

      Comment

      • The Coon Dog
        Bulldog Team of the Century
        • Jan 2007
        • 7575

        #4
        Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

        Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon

        We could, if we so choose:

        Delist Wight, Skipper, O'Shea
        Retire Welsh & Eagleton
        Trade O'Keefe
        = 6 out

        Elevate Picken, Shaw, Mulligan
        Trade for Hall
        = 4 in

        And go into the draft with just 2 picks.
        Or just whack him on the veteran's list.
        [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

        Comment

        • chef
          Hall of Fame
          • Nov 2008
          • 14474

          #5
          Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

          Originally posted by The Coon Dog
          Or just whack him on the veteran's list.
          Do you think he has another season in him ?
          The curse is dead.

          Comment

          • The Coon Dog
            Bulldog Team of the Century
            • Jan 2007
            • 7575

            #6
            Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

            Originally posted by chef
            Do you think he has another season in him ?
            At times he shows (such as last week) he can still run & kick long goals, something in short supply.

            I'm not the one who has to make the call on that, but if the club do decide to retain him, he can be placed on the veteran's list (along with Johnno) & only half their salary counts in the cap & we can have 2 less rookies as a result.

            Veterans are not on the list in a sense so putting him on there wouldn't deprive us of an additional selection in the National Draft.
            [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

            Comment

            • LostDoggy
              WOOF Member
              • Jan 2007
              • 8307

              #7
              Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

              Originally posted by The Coon Dog
              At times he shows (such as last week) he can still run & kick long goals, something in short supply.
              1 week of 6. Can we afford to go through 5 weeks of crap everytime?

              Comment

              • Go_Dogs
                Hall of Fame
                • Jan 2007
                • 10080

                #8
                Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                Originally posted by ErnieSigley
                1 week of 6. Can we afford to go through 5 weeks of crap everytime?
                Did pretty well tonight against Geelong. I'd keep him around for one more year.
                Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?

                Comment

                • Sockeye Salmon
                  Bulldog Team of the Century
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 6365

                  #9
                  Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                  Originally posted by Griffen#16
                  Did pretty well tonight against Geelong. I'd keep him around for one more year.
                  Unfortunately for Eagle we need to free up some cap space. That means Welsh, Eagle and maybe even Hahn could be in strife.

                  Comment

                  • The Coon Dog
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 7575

                    #10
                    Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                    Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                    Unfortunately for Eagle we need to free up some cap space. That means Welsh, Eagle and maybe even Hahn could be in strife.
                    He might have his bacon saved as a consequence of being eligible for the veterans list next season.
                    [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                    Comment

                    • Sockeye Salmon
                      Bulldog Team of the Century
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 6365

                      #11
                      Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                      Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                      He might have his bacon saved as a consequence of being eligible for the veterans list next season.
                      That only half saves him.

                      I don't know how much Eagle would be on. $300K perhaps? Delisting rather than vet listing would still save us $150K.

                      Comment

                      • GVGjr
                        Moderator
                        • Nov 2006
                        • 43913

                        #12
                        Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                        Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                        That only half saves him.

                        I don't know how much Eagle would be on. $300K perhaps? Delisting rather than vet listing would still save us $150K.
                        I'm far from an Eagleton basher but we will need to make some hard decisions at the end of the season on who we maintain and veterans list or not, Eagleton would need some luck to be maintained.
                        Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                        Comment

                        • mjp
                          Bulldog Team of the Century
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 7248

                          #13
                          Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                          Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                          That is interesting.

                          We could, if we so choose:

                          Delist Wight, Skipper, O'Shea
                          Retire Welsh & Eagleton
                          Trade O'Keefe
                          = 6 out

                          Elevate Picken, Shaw, Mulligan
                          Trade for Hall
                          = 4 in

                          And go into the draft with just 2 picks.



                          /// Not saying that this is what I would do or what I think Eade would do, just that it is now possible. ///
                          I think Lynch would be very lucky to be retained as well SS - that would be seven (7) out.

                          Skipper is interesting though - if he is delisted it almost means that Shaw needs to be elevated...and Shaw probably isn't quite ready. This will be an important decision, but going with Shaw over Skipper will save the club around AUD$60K so there is a financial as well as age issue for making that decision.

                          I would prefer to try and re-rookie both Mulligan and Shaw if possible - I think they are now reaching the stage where if there is an injury they could (should!) be able to come in and perform...but it is unlikely they will be required unless there is an injury.

                          The outs for me are O'Keefe (traded - we clearly dont want him), Lynch, Wight and O'Shea with Welsh and Eagleton to retire (or be instructed that they have retired). Picken elevated - try and re-rookie the other two but if we cant, well...does it really matter that much?

                          I would like to think Aker continues and forget the pay cut - he is still in our best 4 or 5 players and one more year at whatever he is on right now sounds like a great deal to me.
                          What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

                          Comment

                          • mighty_west
                            Coaching Staff
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 3378

                            #14
                            Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                            Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                            That only half saves him.

                            I don't know how much Eagle would be on. $300K perhaps? Delisting rather than vet listing would still save us $150K.

                            Another option could be to offer him a 1 year deal on the vets list, but with a massive pay cut, say he is on 300K, tell him to play he has to take a 50% cut to go on, therefor only 75K goes onto the cap.

                            Comment

                            • Mofra
                              Hall of Fame
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 14802

                              #15
                              Re: Rookies to be included in trade week

                              Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                              Unfortunately for Eagle we need to free up some cap space. That means Welsh, Eagle and maybe even Hahn could be in strife.
                              How would Eagle going free up cap space? Even if he is on much more than base, 50% of his pay will not be counted on the Vets list. He will probably cost the club little more (perhaps even less) than a first year player.
                              Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                              Comment

                              Working...