If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Blood bath from Aussie openers. 62 runs off 51 balls to start the morning.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
It is frustrating. The penalties seemed to be harsher a few years ago and captains would visibly hurry everyone along when teams were slipping behind the over rate, needs another shake up.
It is frustrating. The penalties seemed to be harsher a few years ago and captains would visibly hurry everyone along when teams were slipping behind the over rate, needs another shake up.
How about every hour short of 15 overs, say if it was 12 or 13 overs (ie. 2 or 3 overs short), gets a no ball for every said over. So after the drinks break the batsmen get 2 or 3 no balls to re-start their innings. Could be a momentum changing punishment.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
How about every hour short of 15 overs, say if it was 12 or 13 overs (ie. 2 or 3 overs short), gets a no ball for every said over. So after the drinks break the batsmen get 2 or 3 no balls to re-start their innings. Could be a momentum changing punishment.
A two or three run penalty for slow over rates? Seems kind of redundant.
A two or three run penalty for slow over rates? Seems kind of redundant.
It would give the batsmen 2 or 3 free swings to start the hour though which would be a huge advantage and good entertainment.
Can't see it happening though. Batsmen can influence the over rate (excessive sideboard changes, glove/bat changes, backing away in bowlers run up etc), if you give them a direct benefit for slowing the game down, the results would not be good.
Think penalties need to be in the form of fines, suspensions as well as more flexibility in extending playing hours, break lengths etc.
It would give the batsmen 2 or 3 free swings to start the hour though which would be a huge advantage and good entertainment.
Can't see it happening though. Batsmen can influence the over rate (excessive sideboard changes, glove/bat changes, backing away in bowlers run up etc), if you give them a direct benefit for slowing the game down, the results would not be good.
Think penalties need to be in the form of fines, suspensions as well as more flexibility in extending playing hours, break lengths etc.
Thats a good point about batsmen slowing the game down. That's what I would do. Not all the time but every now and then.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
I believe the term for my cricketing competence is 'gumby'. But I reckon I'd be good for a 50 or more against this uninspired bowling.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
If I were a gambling investigator, I'd be looking at today. No balls were infrequent in the NZ series, but several overs today started with no balls and a heap through the day. And not just over, some were 10-15cm over seemingly to make sure. Add in suspicious strategy and not taking the new ball to limit the scoring and you've got to wonder if it's pathetic bowling and pathetic captaincy with unfortunately timed big no balls or whether it's something else.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
If I were a gambling investigator, I'd be looking at today. No balls were infrequent in the NZ series, but several overs today started with no balls and a heap through the day. And not just over, some were 10-15cm over seemingly to make sure. Add in suspicious strategy and not taking the new ball to limit the scoring and you've got to wonder if it's pathetic bowling and pathetic captaincy with unfortunately timed big no balls or whether it's something else.
Got the feeling West Indian cricket is rife with money hungry shysters, with many big names refusing to make themselves available for Test cricket in favour of the quick T20 cash.
Wouldn't surprise me at all if some of their players were using this trip to fatten their wallets.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
Comment