Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bulldogtragic
    The List Manager
    • Jan 2007
    • 34316

    #16
    Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

    Blood bath from Aussie openers. 62 runs off 51 balls to start the morning.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

    Comment

    • Sedat
      Hall of Fame
      • Sep 2007
      • 11047

      #17
      Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

      3/121 at lunch. Warner out, so that makes things interesting.
      "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

      Comment

      • Mantis
        Hall of Fame
        • Apr 2007
        • 15199

        #18
        Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

        Originally posted by Sedat
        3/121 at lunch. Warner out, so that makes things interesting.
        Off only 24 overs.. Here is a way to fix up up test cricket.. Improve the *!*!*!*!ing over rates.. It's pathetic that they bowl 12 overs per hour.

        Comment

        • Ozza
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Mar 2008
          • 6380

          #19
          Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

          Originally posted by Mantis
          Off only 24 overs.. Here is a way to fix up up test cricket.. Improve the *!*!*!*!ing over rates.. It's pathetic that they bowl 12 overs per hour.
          Agree. The fast bowlers just crawl through their overs, wandering so slowly back to their marks.

          Comment

          • LostDoggy
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2007
            • 8307

            #20
            Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

            It is frustrating. The penalties seemed to be harsher a few years ago and captains would visibly hurry everyone along when teams were slipping behind the over rate, needs another shake up.

            Comment

            • bulldogtragic
              The List Manager
              • Jan 2007
              • 34316

              #21
              Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

              Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
              It is frustrating. The penalties seemed to be harsher a few years ago and captains would visibly hurry everyone along when teams were slipping behind the over rate, needs another shake up.
              How about every hour short of 15 overs, say if it was 12 or 13 overs (ie. 2 or 3 overs short), gets a no ball for every said over. So after the drinks break the batsmen get 2 or 3 no balls to re-start their innings. Could be a momentum changing punishment.
              Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

              Comment

              • Ozza
                Bulldog Team of the Century
                • Mar 2008
                • 6380

                #22
                Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                Voges nudging his test average over 60 as of right now....that really snuck up!

                Comment

                • westdog54
                  Bulldog Team of the Century
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 6683

                  #23
                  Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                  Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                  How about every hour short of 15 overs, say if it was 12 or 13 overs (ie. 2 or 3 overs short), gets a no ball for every said over. So after the drinks break the batsmen get 2 or 3 no balls to re-start their innings. Could be a momentum changing punishment.
                  A two or three run penalty for slow over rates? Seems kind of redundant.

                  Comment

                  • Remi Moses
                    WOOF Member
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 14785

                    #24
                    Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                    Gee the windies once bowled 60 overs a day and used to bowl teams out .
                    Or terrified them into submission

                    Comment

                    • LostDoggy
                      WOOF Member
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 8307

                      #25
                      Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                      Originally posted by westdog54
                      A two or three run penalty for slow over rates? Seems kind of redundant.
                      It would give the batsmen 2 or 3 free swings to start the hour though which would be a huge advantage and good entertainment.

                      Can't see it happening though. Batsmen can influence the over rate (excessive sideboard changes, glove/bat changes, backing away in bowlers run up etc), if you give them a direct benefit for slowing the game down, the results would not be good.

                      Think penalties need to be in the form of fines, suspensions as well as more flexibility in extending playing hours, break lengths etc.

                      Comment

                      • Twodogs
                        Administrator
                        • Nov 2006
                        • 27646

                        #26
                        Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                        Originally posted by PeanutsPeanuts
                        It would give the batsmen 2 or 3 free swings to start the hour though which would be a huge advantage and good entertainment.

                        Can't see it happening though. Batsmen can influence the over rate (excessive sideboard changes, glove/bat changes, backing away in bowlers run up etc), if you give them a direct benefit for slowing the game down, the results would not be good.

                        Think penalties need to be in the form of fines, suspensions as well as more flexibility in extending playing hours, break lengths etc.

                        Thats a good point about batsmen slowing the game down. That's what I would do. Not all the time but every now and then.
                        They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                        Comment

                        • bulldogtragic
                          The List Manager
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 34316

                          #27
                          Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                          I believe the term for my cricketing competence is 'gumby'. But I reckon I'd be good for a 50 or more against this uninspired bowling.
                          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                          Comment

                          • Bornadog
                            WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 65597

                            #28
                            Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                            Shaun Marsh, Century
                            FFC: Established 1883

                            Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                            Comment

                            • bulldogtragic
                              The List Manager
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 34316

                              #29
                              Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                              If I were a gambling investigator, I'd be looking at today. No balls were infrequent in the NZ series, but several overs today started with no balls and a heap through the day. And not just over, some were 10-15cm over seemingly to make sure. Add in suspicious strategy and not taking the new ball to limit the scoring and you've got to wonder if it's pathetic bowling and pathetic captaincy with unfortunately timed big no balls or whether it's something else.
                              Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                              Comment

                              • comrade
                                Hall of Fame
                                • Jun 2008
                                • 17836

                                #30
                                Re: Australia vs West Indies 1st Test

                                Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                                If I were a gambling investigator, I'd be looking at today. No balls were infrequent in the NZ series, but several overs today started with no balls and a heap through the day. And not just over, some were 10-15cm over seemingly to make sure. Add in suspicious strategy and not taking the new ball to limit the scoring and you've got to wonder if it's pathetic bowling and pathetic captaincy with unfortunately timed big no balls or whether it's something else.
                                Got the feeling West Indian cricket is rife with money hungry shysters, with many big names refusing to make themselves available for Test cricket in favour of the quick T20 cash.

                                Wouldn't surprise me at all if some of their players were using this trip to fatten their wallets.
                                Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

                                Comment

                                Working...