Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
Collapse
X
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
If you want an example of how and why AFL blokey-bloke culture is so ridiculous, you only need to point out that people within the industry think Campbell Brown is a good guy that should be on TV.TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
Sounds like a horrible place, no wonder they have turned to the drink!Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
Apparently it was out of control for a while now .
Good luck with getting another gig in the footy industry Guy McKenna.
This issues resonates for every generation, but the issue now is it isn't acceptable in a professional environment .Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
He already has one, well sort of (footy media).. His good mate made certain of this.Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
In isolation it would appear harsh, but in the context of the edict the players took upon themselves to propose and agree to it is a necessary outcome.
The playing group clearly set a no drinking policy for a 3 week period, as a gesture to try and set a baseline for professionalism. Given their shocking performance on and off the field it seems the group needed to institute some semblance of rules. Dixon and Martin chose to walk away from that and if they weren't punished it would make it even harder to instil any positive standards going forward.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
If the players have agreed, taken an oath, whatever the form of the no-drinking resolution was, the terms are clear. I would think anything other than following through creates more issues.
If certain players did not agree with the resolution, they should have voiced that prior to or during its inception and sought to negotiate terms they were comfortable with.Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
If the players have agreed, taken an oath, whatever the form of the no-drinking resolution was, the terms are clear. I would think anything other than following through creates more issues.
If certain players did not agree with the resolution, they should have voiced that prior to or during its inception and sought to negotiate terms they were comfortable with.
I'm not excusing the behaviour, but after multiple incidents I wonder how effective anything the leadership group is trying to implement is, and why it's so hard.TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
From the outside looking in it's easy to suggest that a mandate was reached for the leadership group to set policy and penalty at their discretion. But what happens when the leadership is well out of touch with the rest of the playing group?
I'm not excusing the behaviour, but after multiple incidents I wonder how effective anything the leadership group is trying to implement is, and why it's so hard.Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
From the outside looking in it's easy to suggest that a mandate was reached for the leadership group to set policy and penalty at their discretion. But what happens when the leadership is well out of touch with the rest of the playing group?
I'm not excusing the behaviour, but after multiple incidents I wonder how effective anything the leadership group is trying to implement is, and why it's so hard.They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
Wayne Carey's take on it
No drinking before games? Football has become a nanny state
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -Comment
-
Re: Charlie Dixon and Jack Martin
Carey's article is spot on in my opinion.
Particularly the parts about clubs setting widespread drinking bans (or similar) that just sets up players to fail.
Fair enough GCS don't want their players to be out on Cavel Avenue until all hours getting into trouble, but going too far (as a leadership or coaching group) the other way and deciding to ban the players from drinking or going out - just creates a resentful player group on the whole.Comment
Comment