Proactive Poaching

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Twodogs
    Moderator
    • Nov 2006
    • 27666

    Re: Proactive Poaching

    Originally posted by dadsgirl16
    BUT.. I have a special bottle waiting to be opened when we make like bandits!
    Oh? A special bottle, sounds, errrrr, special I guess.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

    Comment

    • Bornadog
      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
      • Jan 2007
      • 67350

      Re: Proactive Poaching

      Originally posted by kruder
      Still don't get why they traded for Aish in the first place. A VFL player at best.
      True.

      He has requested a trade to Freo. Freo offering a three year deal
      FFC: Established 1883

      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

      Comment

      • Bulldog Joe
        Premiership Moderator
        • Jul 2009
        • 5616

        Re: Proactive Poaching

        Originally posted by bornadog
        True.

        He has requested a trade to Freo. Freo offering a three year deal
        Peel must need some experience.
        Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured

        Comment

        • Happy Days
          Hall of Fame
          • May 2008
          • 10205

          Re: Proactive Poaching

          There’s cards to fall yet but losing Brad Hill and Ed Langdon only to replace them with James Aish is a dire result for Freo’s immediate future.
          - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

          Comment

          • hujsh
            Hall of Fame
            • Nov 2007
            • 11891

            Re: Proactive Poaching

            We've apparently rejected a proposal where:

            Western Bulldogs — Receives: Alex Keath, Josh Bruce and Pick 23 | Loses: Picks 13, 32 and 51

            Other clubs really want that 13 it seems.
            [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

            Comment

            • GVGjr
              Moderator
              • Nov 2006
              • 45056

              Re: Proactive Poaching

              Originally posted by hujsh
              We've apparently rejected a proposal where:

              Western Bulldogs — Receives: Alex Keath, Josh Bruce and Pick 23 | Loses: Picks 13, 32 and 51

              Other clubs really want that 13 it seems.
              That's a combination of what Adelaide originally suggested.
              It appears we are standing pat on pick 13. If someone wants it they will need to pay overs to get it and even then it might be rejected

              I think we are still in the drivers seat to get our targets, midday tomorrow will probably tell the story
              Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

              Comment

              • AshMac
                WOOF Member
                • Aug 2018
                • 1712

                Re: Proactive Poaching

                Originally posted by GVGjr
                That's a combination of what Adelaide originally suggested.
                It appears we are standing pat on pick 13. If someone wants it they will need to pay overs to get it and even then it might be rejected

                I think we are still in the drivers seat to get our targets, midday tomorrow will probably tell the story
                Would love a peek inside Sammy Ps brain right now.... love the fact we rejected that ridiculous offer.

                Just read an article on Fox citing Bruce has told close friends he’s being pushed out of st Kilda...
                The dam wall has busted!

                Comment

                • hujsh
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 11891

                  Re: Proactive Poaching

                  Originally posted by AshMac
                  Would love a peek inside Sammy Ps brain right now.... love the fact we rejected that ridiculous offer.

                  Just read an article on Fox citing Bruce has told close friends he’s being pushed out of st Kilda...
                  True that. A 10 pick upgrade to the top 15 and pick 51 is a lot for an uncontracted player at age 28 with 30 games of experience and an interrupted pre-season and a downgrade of 28 to 32. Adelaide laughing all the way to the bank so I'm sure they were happy to propose it. Sydney and St.Kilda do fine enough so no reason they'd care
                  [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                  Comment

                  • The Doctor
                    Coaching Staff
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 3704

                    Re: Proactive Poaching

                    Apparantly we are trying to broker a deal with Port. I can only suspect that we are after their pick 29 & hoping to use our 3rd round picks in some form to make it happen
                    Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket

                    Comment

                    • kruder
                      Coaching Staff
                      • May 2011
                      • 3907

                      Re: Proactive Poaching

                      I'm not fussed picks wise really keen to get the structural players in, I think generally pics are overrated outside of last years draft.

                      If moving to 23 doesn't impact next year Academy picks and lands us Bruce and Keath I'm fine with it.

                      Comment

                      • azabob
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Sep 2008
                        • 15425

                        Re: Proactive Poaching

                        Originally posted by kruder
                        I'm not fussed picks wise really keen to get the structural players in, I think generally pics are overrated outside of last years draft.

                        If moving to 23 doesn't impact next year Academy picks and lands us Bruce and Keath I'm fine with it.
                        Agree. Bruce and Keith will add a lot to our structure next year.
                        More of an In Bruges guy?

                        Comment

                        • Twodogs
                          Moderator
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 27666

                          Re: Proactive Poaching

                          Originally posted by kruder
                          I'm not fussed picks wise really keen to get the structural players in, I think generally pics are overrated outside of last years draft.

                          If moving to 23 doesn't impact next year Academy picks and lands us Bruce and Keath I'm fine with it.
                          Yep, having Keath and Bruce (I can't help not to think of Bruce McAveney though) will add to our won colomn next year.
                          They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                          Comment

                          • KT31
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 5454

                            Re: Proactive Poaching

                            Originally posted by kruder
                            I'm not fussed picks wise really keen to get the structural players in, I think generally pics are overrated outside of last years draft.

                            If moving to 23 doesn't impact next year Academy picks and lands us Bruce and Keath I'm fine with it.
                            Same for me, much better down the line with both Keath and Bruce and if it will give us a much better chance at a tilt.
                            It's better to die on our feet than live on our knees.

                            Comment

                            • bulldogtragic
                              The List Manager
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 34289

                              Re: Proactive Poaching

                              Originally posted by hujsh
                              We've apparently rejected a proposal where:

                              Western Bulldogs — Receives: Alex Keath, Josh Bruce and Pick 23 | Loses: Picks 13, 32 and 51

                              Other clubs really want that 13 it seems.
                              I just read the fox sports full detail on it. These are the two take aways for me:

                              St Kilda was said to be happy to trade pick 28 for Josh Bruce (Swans also happy with 28 for Jones). -- Are they really going to *!*!*!*! themselves over Pick 32 (only 4 spots in the later second round)? No. So the deal gets done for Pick 32, unless we find a minor bump for them. Yippee, this one looks good.

                              Adelaide are working on their side to get the best deal for a trade, but being stupid about their request. This is no better than their opening offer. When reality sets in that Sam Power isn't a walkover, they'll take pick 44. They should've tried on the trade but only 13 & 44 (not 13, 32 & 51). Dodoro Jr is doing well at making an arse of himself.
                              Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                              Comment

                              • bulldogtragic
                                The List Manager
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 34289

                                Re: Proactive Poaching

                                This was my guess on the four club trade that Sam Power was pushing.

                                Reporting today was that St Kilda & Sydney are happy with Pick 28 if it done through Adelaide. This model is Pick 29. So we can lock them in

                                Port: 13, 36 DVI (51 & 53) - for - 18 (Howard & Ryder), 29
                                Dogs: Bruce (29), 18 & keep 32 - for - 13, 51 & 53
                                Swans: 29 - for - Zak Jones
                                Saints: Jones, Howard, Ryder - for - Bruce/Pick 29, Pick 18

                                Port get a pick in before 18 where F/S Mead may be bid, and pick 36 in points still cover Mead with later 60’s picks. Ensures them 3 x 1sts (inc. Mead). They should sign on to this.
                                Dogs get Bruce for a trade down 13 to 18, 51 & 53. I'm happy.
                                Swans apparently happy to take this aspect of the deal
                                Saints flip Bruce into Zak Jones, and use pick 18 on Howard & Ryder. Apparently happy with the Bruce pick aspect.

                                Assuming I'm remotely close, three clubs are happy to sign off and Port has no reason not to be happy or not sign off.

                                Before dogs: 13, 32, 44, 51 & 53, 89
                                After dogs: 18, 32, 44, 89 & Bruce

                                Keath Option 1: Pick 44 - Picks 18, 32, 89 & Bruce, Keath
                                Keath Option 2: Pick 32 - Picks 18, 44, 89 & Bruce, Keath
                                Keath Option 3: Picks 18 & 44 - Picks 23 & 49 - Picks 23, 32, 49, 89 & Bruce, Keath. (Picks 32, 49 = DVI 21. Freo may be open to trade 22 we can find a Pick 60'ish pick to add more points to a 130-150 point win. If we can find it: Picks 22 & 23, 89 Bruce & Keath)
                                Last edited by bulldogtragic; 14-10-2019, 10:12 PM.
                                Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                                Comment

                                Working...