If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I read it happened after Kyle Cheany and Ben Stratton talked after their game friday night and Stratton told Beveridge.
The statement by the Bulldogs' CEO (see Club's official website) says they became aware of the allegations on Monday, 14 September. The Crows/Hawks match was played 4 days later, Friday 18 September.
I think that we have to hold judgement. It may be that our Talia had a case of loose lips on a couple of points as opposed to maliciously leaking chosen details. We have not been told exactly what was leaked. The Crows have said their coaching staff were not aware of the information before the match.
How very, very sad on so many fronts. Will await outcome of investigation and hope the AFL are really thorough. I fear we will be worse off trade wise through no fault of our own. There are so many angles to this, I am just stunned.
On a night we should be celebrating Captain Murph, Woody and Stringer as AA's...
Josie :)
Our day will come
And we'll have everything.
We'll share the joy
Just like '54 again.
The statement by the Bulldogs' CEO (see Club's official website) says they became aware of the allegations on Monday, 14 September. The Crows/Hawks match was played 4 days later, Friday 18 September.
I think that we have to hold judgement. It may be that our Talia had a case of loose lips on a couple of points as opposed to maliciously leaking chosen details. We have not been told exactly what was leaked. The Crows have said their coaching staff were not aware of the information before the match.
And Chopper Reid said he never killed anyone that didn't deserve it. Doesn't mean it's true what response did you expect out of Adelaide?
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
The statement by the Bulldogs' CEO (see Club's official website) says they became aware of the allegations on Monday, 14 September. The Crows/Hawks match was played 4 days later, Friday 18 September.
I think that we have to hold judgement. It may be that our Talia had a case of loose lips on a couple of points as opposed to maliciously leaking chosen details. We have not been told exactly what was leaked.
Points well made. There are inconsistencies in what is being reported and for me it comes down to intent.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
It may be that our Talia had a case of loose lips on a couple of points as opposed to maliciously leaking chosen details. We have not been told exactly what was leaked.
Seems the opposite. Have read that it was quite detailed game day plans. Crows mysteriously reading our moves.
It's prelim final week. We would've guessed the three All Australians tonight. Yet we made a public statement. Perhaps the club thought this was very serious?
We would've had to factor in the impact on Talia the person and player, but also on our players. Perhaps the club thought this was very serious. This most certainly ends our relationship with him. Again, the club might have thought and known that ending this relationship was because it was very serious. The club would've weighed up fractures in our playing group if his team mates thought we'd hung him out to dry. I guess the club thought it was very serious and could produce evidence to any upset players.
There's rumours abound about potential new sponsors, yet we put out a public statement that will deflect a fair bit of positive press. Perhaps the club thought this was very serious.
The club conducted an investigation, overseen by the President who is a legal genius based on his ability to win major class actions. The club decided after this to make a voluntary report of a listed player and not use its powers to fine players. Perhaps not fining him for an low level accident or mistake shows the club thought this was serious.
We would've worked out the trade value of what would've been a good pick or player trade would diminish to possibly nothing and that relations with a powerful AFL club would end in the gutter for the time being. Perhaps the club thought this was serious.
Surely the clubs leaders would have weighed all these risks against the likelihood of a finding of guilt. Obviously all these negatives for something that could not be established would make it a dumb thing to do. Perhaps the club is confident that it's serious and confident that the media backlash and flow on problems are worth pursuing this.
I'm backing our club & our clubs leaders 100%.
If you change clubs and people to Pakistan cricket - sensitive info was handed on or was passed on by a player of one team to an opposition team. The opposition team in receipt of the sensitive info narrowly won. People betting who may have known about it and received money or betting agencies fluctuations may be in big trouble. Frankly, I don't see how this doesn't get bumped to both state police forces as a matter of routine like David Kings matter did.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
But it's also points to the crows being undermining too if they used the information, knowing that its not right.
Who's worse ? Talia or the Crows ?
Talia (if true) without a doubt. Look its competitive sport. If information comes into your hands re a game plan.....
Talia (or the culprit who leaked the information), has no excuse. At the very least its a breach of confidentiality, at worst its theft of intellectual property.
Talia (if true) without a doubt. Look its competitive sport. If information comes into your hands re a game plan.....
Talia (or the culprit who leaked the information), has no excuse. At the very least its a breach of confidentiality, at worst its theft of intellectual property.
He is a very silly boy if this is true.
Was there was a mini betting plunge on Adelaide.
If a substantial leak is true the bookies will be fuming, could have cost them millions.
We should be fuming, could have cost us a premiership and much more.
But it's also points to the crows being undermining too if they used the information, knowing that its not right.
Who's worse ? Talia or the Crows ?
Both. The decent and honest thing to do would be report that the information had come to you, before the match. Naïve? Perhaps. But many of us stood at Fed Square and listened to our passionate and fierce President, who finished his speech by imploring his Bulldogs mob to spare a thought for a team that lost its coach and deserved our respect and sportsmanship, cut-throat final or not.
And all the while the bastards were reading our mail?!
One more reason to hate them just got chalked up on a very old chalkboard.
Originally posted by azabob
I read it happened after Kyle Cheany and Ben Stratton talked after their game friday night and Stratton told Beveridge.
Wow. Kyle Cheney has actually done something useful on a footy field?
Seriously, if true, how did this come up? Why would he tell Stratton unless it was significant in their victory? I somewhat doubt this is true but if so, proves it made the difference.
Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
Not only can he not play, he's also an absolute moron.
I just hope Adelaide or Sydney are silly enough to cough up something decent for him.
I don't care if we get pick 146. Some things are more important.
Comment