Re: So. What's our best forward set up look like?
I'm not sold Redpath is our man long term to be the second big forward, or even now. But he would straighten us up a bit in Boyd's absence. I'd like to see Fletch or Hamling given a few weeks to see what it looks like with them in it. But when Boyd rucks we are left without our monster sized forward, so the ruck issue raises up in this conversation now, for me at least. So to change the question for next year, if we have the cash and will to go after a big trade again do we look at a silky smooth gun midfielder or a CHF? Crameri is back too.
I think Hurley as a free agent, at the risk of getting punched at in the face, could be a dangerous forward if Boyd & Stringer get the best two defenders. Hurley & Crameri get 3rd and 4th defenders, Dickson 5th and rotating smalls around. I guess money is the issue for a list management aspect. Conversely, would Bevo play two massive forwards and two rucks. I can't see that unless it's a case where Roughead rests back, Campbell rests forward and the second Hurley type swings around with the rotations. This is the part of our structures I struggle to get my head around, we need lots of run but when the entries are average or we revert to bombing it we need at least another big body with competency down there. Hawthorn, WCE and Adelaide play similar zone defence with run and carry but have multiple big targets and resting rucks.
I'm not sold Redpath is our man long term to be the second big forward, or even now. But he would straighten us up a bit in Boyd's absence. I'd like to see Fletch or Hamling given a few weeks to see what it looks like with them in it. But when Boyd rucks we are left without our monster sized forward, so the ruck issue raises up in this conversation now, for me at least. So to change the question for next year, if we have the cash and will to go after a big trade again do we look at a silky smooth gun midfielder or a CHF? Crameri is back too.
I think Hurley as a free agent, at the risk of getting punched at in the face, could be a dangerous forward if Boyd & Stringer get the best two defenders. Hurley & Crameri get 3rd and 4th defenders, Dickson 5th and rotating smalls around. I guess money is the issue for a list management aspect. Conversely, would Bevo play two massive forwards and two rucks. I can't see that unless it's a case where Roughead rests back, Campbell rests forward and the second Hurley type swings around with the rotations. This is the part of our structures I struggle to get my head around, we need lots of run but when the entries are average or we revert to bombing it we need at least another big body with competency down there. Hawthorn, WCE and Adelaide play similar zone defence with run and carry but have multiple big targets and resting rucks.
Comment