Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
Collapse
X
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
We need more assistance inside, so I'd bring Dunkley in. He can also go forward & provide nuisance value.
Not sure what to do with the ruck scenario but I hate the idea of Boyd, Campbell & Cloke all in the same team. Going ultra tall just doesn't work anymore unless the players are super mobile.
Hurry up & get buff, Timmy English!
Cloke is very mobile leads up at the footy and runs all day, Boyd is now mobile and will play forward/ruck and Campbell your traditional ruckman. Um how is this set up too tall?Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
I agree - "too tall" is an excuse from old-days football where players pretty much stayed in one position or the game.
The question is how much defensive pressure as a unit our forwards will put on the opposition when the ball is in transition.
Cloke and Boyd are ok but questionable at times, Crameri decent for his size, and Stringer put in quite a few excellent chases in round 1.Western Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
In- Adams, Campbell
Out- Morris (inj), Daniel
Need Adams for defensive flexibility, although I've serious reservations about his recent form. Boyd plays his best footy in a mix of ruck and forward, he was largely ineffective as a full time ruckman, and Campbell can play a mix of ruck and forward too. Cloke to play higher up the ground as he did Firday night.
Daniel was terrible Friday and his last 3 games at AFL level have been a mix of average to poor. His disposal under real pressure is a concern.[COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
In- Adams, Campbell
Out- Morris (inj), Daniel
Need Adams for defensive flexibility, although I've serious reservations about his recent form. Boyd plays his best footy in a mix of ruck and forward, he was largely ineffective as a full time ruckman, and Campbell can play a mix of ruck and forward too. Cloke to play higher up the ground as he did Firday night.
Daniel was terrible Friday and his last 3 games at AFL level have been a mix of average to poor. His disposal under real pressure is a concern.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
I don't think Adams is AFL level.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
Adams current form is shite, I'll pay that. Losing a gun like Morris for a while I guess highlights why the club chased hard and virtually landed Hurley. I think a decent KPD something to target later this year. But with Collins injured and the new kids say too raw, we go in smaller than we did in the GF or we take in Adams and back him in.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
Playing Cordy back we go in no smaller. Roberts and Cordy / Hamling. Reid may play forward so there is a case for Adams, although if Campbell comes in Reid may be required back on the resting ruck as Grundy / Laidler will be too small.
Who does Adams play on up forward?But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
So we are down Hamling & Morris. Cordy covers one of them. By my count, we are down one tall defender from the set up that won the GF. So taking names out of it, we stick with that winning set up, or we change the set up. My inclination is to stick with what works.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
We played in the GF: Roberts, Wood, Hamling, Morris.
So we are down Hamling & Morris. Cordy covers one of them. By my count, we are down one tall defender from the set up that won the GF. So taking names out of it, we stick with that winning set up, or we change the set up. My inclination is to stick with what works.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
We played in the GF: Roberts, Wood, Hamling, Morris.
So we are down Hamling & Morris. Cordy covers one of them. By my count, we are down one tall defender from the set up that won the GF. So taking names out of it, we stick with that winning set up, or we change the set up. My inclination is to stick with what works.
Adams in his current form is a complete liability. He's panicky enough as it is. He needs time to get some touch in the VFL.But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
Not sure about that.
Adams, as woeful as his pre-season form was (and based on that I too have serious reservations about picking him), did play at a very high standard for the majority of his games last season, somehow never really getting punished for the huge weaknesses in his game. None the less he demonstrated he is clearly capable at the level.
Collins for mine has yet to show anything AFL standard at a decent level of footy. His sole AFL game he looked slow and immobile and stuffed up a couple of kicks, and his VFL form has been underwhelming. He is still young and will develop, but I cannot see how anyone would pick him ahead of a fit Adams atm even with Adams pre-season form.I should leave it alone but you're not rightComment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
Not sure about that.
Adams, as woeful as his pre-season form was (and based on that I too have serious reservations about picking him), did play at a very high standard for the majority of his games last season, somehow never really getting punished for the huge weaknesses in his game. None the less he demonstrated he is clearly capable at the level.
Collins for mine has yet to show anything AFL standard at a decent level of footy. His sole AFL game he looked slow and immobile and stuffed up a couple of kicks, and his VFL form has been underwhelming. He is still young and will develop, but I cannot see how anyone would pick him ahead of a fit Adams atm even with Adams pre-season form.
I would like to see Campbell in for Morris. We have enough players in the backline to cover the back half.
Roberts, Wood, MBoyd, Suckling, Biggs, Murphy, JJ and Cordy for starters.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Match Committee - Round 2 2017 vs Sydney Swans
Adams was like a rabbit in the headlights in the JLT. He would have to have improved dramatically since then to warrant selection.
I would retain Daniel without hesitation.Comment
Comment