Re: Ekers
I have never found selecting a club's Eker as I do this year with the doggies.
My general rules are:
- never been a 'star'. Contrary to a lot of people's opinion, being an Eker does not = being a dud (although minimalistic survival is highly valued).
- really want more than 6-7 years in the AFL system, the longer the better. As I mentioned in the previous post, lots of psudeo Ekers who are 24 years old. The next contract makes or breaks real Ekers.
- I like a good low games played to years in the system ratio. As mentioned earlier, minimalistic survival is key.
- playing for multiple teams and surviving via rookie drafts, delisted free agency and/or steak knives trade deals adds Eker value.
The Bulldogs have a few Eker-ish guys like Prudden, Campbell, Redpath, Jong, Biggs and Honeychurch but all have only been in the AFL system for 4-5 years.
Prudden has has 4 games in 4 years and gets another go on the rookie list due to his great attitude, which is a strong Eker subset.
I have never found selecting a club's Eker as I do this year with the doggies.
My general rules are:
- never been a 'star'. Contrary to a lot of people's opinion, being an Eker does not = being a dud (although minimalistic survival is highly valued).
- really want more than 6-7 years in the AFL system, the longer the better. As I mentioned in the previous post, lots of psudeo Ekers who are 24 years old. The next contract makes or breaks real Ekers.
- I like a good low games played to years in the system ratio. As mentioned earlier, minimalistic survival is key.
- playing for multiple teams and surviving via rookie drafts, delisted free agency and/or steak knives trade deals adds Eker value.
The Bulldogs have a few Eker-ish guys like Prudden, Campbell, Redpath, Jong, Biggs and Honeychurch but all have only been in the AFL system for 4-5 years.
Prudden has has 4 games in 4 years and gets another go on the rookie list due to his great attitude, which is a strong Eker subset.
Comment