Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LostDoggy
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 8307

    #166
    Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

    Originally posted by soupaman
    -Will Minson. Surely that would have to be one of the worst games he's ever played. It's hard to continue calling Leigh Brown a spud when Will plays like a potato. Usually his disposal by foot is good and his ruckwork is pretty good also. Today he looks slow and cumbersome, couldn't mark a thing and his diposal was woeful. I was very dissapointed with his performance and felt he was a leading candidate for worst on ground.


    Looks like Minson might go back-to-back for the most clangers in the season. As Rocket has said "For such an intelligent man, he does some stupid things."

    Comment

    • AndrewP6
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jan 2009
      • 8142

      #167
      Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

      Originally posted by DOG GOD
      Nothing more that a 50 pt win will satisfy me.
      Nothing less?
      [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

      Comment

      • Hotdog60
        Bulldog Team of the Century
        • Aug 2009
        • 6018

        #168
        Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

        Originally posted by Ozza
        Crossy tried, but there wasn't a lot of defensive running from Higgins, Griff and Gia for mine.

        I'm a big Gia fan - but he was disappointing. And I've posted on another thread what I think of Higgins defensive work at times.
        In fairness to Higgins, Brown stitched him up twice during the game so I'd say the wind was knock out of sails a bit. I wonder if he had been placed on the hit list.
        Don't piss off old people
        The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...

        Comment

        • LostDoggy
          WOOF Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 8307

          #169
          Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

          Originally posted by chef
          Cooney, Griffen and Higgins are three that should out to me yesterday.
          I have had this thought for a while with him, not just from yesterdays game. Just seems to me as though he doesn't work hard enough defensively, happy to look good when he has the ball, but won't work hard enough to shut down his opponent or the opposition.

          Comment

          • Sedat
            Hall of Fame
            • Sep 2007
            • 11604

            #170
            Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

            Originally posted by JH40
            I have had this thought for a while with him, not just from yesterdays game. Just seems to me as though he doesn't work hard enough defensively, happy to look good when he has the ball, but won't work hard enough to shut down his opponent or the opposition.
            I mentioned this after our West Coast loss last season (prior to Hall coming to the club of course) - 6 of our rotating forwards are very much attack-minded playmakers, and the defensive pursuits don't come naturally to them. I'm talking Johnson, Gia, Aker, Murphy, Higgins and Hill, with Hahn being the only exception. Hall has clearly redressed this imbalance but our forward 50, especially if the ball is not delivered in there with precision, still has the occasional tendency to trampoline straight out of there with minimal pressure. Our team currently doesn't have that psycho defensive half-forward who tackles with intent to hurt (ie: Rooke or McQualter), nor do we have the quick small forward pocket to pressure the opposition ball carrier from behind. Unfortunately we don't seem to have either type in our squad either.

            Having said all that, it isn't as though these 6 players cannot perform defensive roles for us when needed - it's just that this isn't their first thought when the ball comes into their area. And when our all-over pressure is slightly down around the ground, we get trapped into having shootouts (which we rarely come out on top of). Our defensive pressure was well down in the first 6 rounds last season (we were 3-3 at the time) and then in the next couple of months we put the squeeze on the opposition and conceded only around 70 points a game (ironically this stretch ended against the Pies last season). If someone like Tiprat Milne can chase and harrass every week (even though bit clearly doesn't come naturally to him), I reckon our talented forward group can also bring this mindset to the table every week.
            "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

            Comment

            • Missing Dog
              WOOF Member
              • Jan 2007
              • 8501

              #171
              Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

              Originally posted by Rance Fan
              Either way i dont think he's up to it.
              Id much prefer the tenacity and hardness of a Ward or Moles, even Tim Callan, Wood, Reid etc
              An odd flashy touch or mark isnt enough for me
              This.

              I'd go as far as to say this year ought to be a make it or move on year for Hill.

              Really no excuses anymore.

              Comment

              • Missing Dog
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2007
                • 8501

                #172
                Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                Those criticising Higgins. IMO he's the best finisher at the club, and as a half forward in the top 4-5 in the league.

                Comment

                • Before I Die
                  Senior Player
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 1033

                  #173
                  Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                  Originally posted by Stefcep
                  This.

                  I'd go as far as to say this year ought to be a make it or move on year for Hill.

                  Really no excuses anymore.
                  I really don't think he needs any excuses. He played 24 out of 25 last year and kicked 33 goals, ranked 4th in the club. He has played a total of 43 games, has all the tools and will most likely be a 200 game player. Quite possibly an absolute champion. Consistency and hardness will come with maturity.

                  Born on 19/1/89, he is slightly younger than Everitt (13/3/89, 25 games) and more than a year younger Harbrow (18/2/88, 49 games) and Stack (26/5/88, 3 games) who were all recruited the same year as him.

                  We are also likely to lose Akermanis, Eagleton and Johnson next year and Hahn will be turning 30.

                  Yes, he didn't have a great game on Sunday and yes, he can look a little soft at times. But it is not a make or break year for him. He has made it already and he will be very important to our team in the very near future if not already now.
                  Last edited by Before I Die; 30-03-2010, 09:56 AM. Reason: spelling errors
                  The Angels have the phone box. [SIZE="2"]Don't blink![/SIZE]

                  Comment

                  • chef
                    Hall of Fame
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 14748

                    #174
                    Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                    Originally posted by Stefcep
                    This.

                    I'd go as far as to say this year ought to be a make it or move on year for Hill.
                    Really no excuses anymore.
                    Can't see that happening. We will have 3 retirements at the end of this year as well as probably losing a best 22 player to the GC.
                    The curse is dead.

                    Comment

                    • Go_Dogs
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 10252

                      #175
                      Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                      Originally posted by Stefcep
                      Those criticising Higgins. IMO he's the best finisher at the club, and as a half forward in the top 4-5 in the league.
                      So, you're happy for laud one player who has a distinct lack of defensive pressure, but not another who you perceive as soft?

                      Yes, Higgins is a terrific finisher and should become a top line player. He still has a lot of work to do to ensure his game becomes more well rounded, otherwise he'll be another flashy player who can't do much else. His skills and game sense are terrific, but his speed, contested skills and especially his defensive efforts which often leave a lot to be desired (and have for his entire time at the club).

                      Hill, for all the talk of him being "soft" is one of our hardest working defensive players. He lacks the physical side to his game, but that is fine. I'd like to see him put his body on the line more often, but some players just aren't going to win contested ball time and time again, and he is one of them. We know he contests very hard aerially, that takes courage. He also chases harder than just about any other forward we have.

                      If we are expecting him to play the role of an inside mid, sure, punish him for not winning contested ball. The fact is we aren't. He has a defined role in the side, and I think he plays it pretty well.

                      Without Hill, our F50 pressure would be absolutely stuffed!
                      Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?

                      Comment

                      • Mantis
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 15547

                        #176
                        Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                        Originally posted by Griffen#16

                        Yes, Higgins is a terrific finisher and should become a top line player. He still has a lot of work to do to ensure his game becomes more well rounded, otherwise he'll be another flashy player who can't do much else. His skills and game sense are terrific, but his speed, contested skills and his defensive efforts often leave a lot to be desired (and have for his entire time at the club).
                        They are as a whole pretty piss poor.

                        Having watched parts of the game this morning (and from the past) he just doesn't push himself hard enough defensively. On a couple of occasions he was happy to give his opponent 10m of space and then after 2 or 3 possesions his opponent still had the same gap and received the ball. If he had closed the gap initially his opponent wouldn't have been an option and we would have had more chance of creating a turnover.

                        Higgins is no doubt an extremely talented player, but is falling into some bad habits, which as a leader he shouldn't have.

                        Comment

                        • chef
                          Hall of Fame
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 14748

                          #177
                          Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                          Originally posted by Griffen#16
                          So, you're happy for laud one player who has a distinct lack of defensive pressure, but not another who you perceive as soft?

                          Yes, Higgins is a terrific finisher and should become a top line player. He still has a lot of work to do to ensure his game becomes more well rounded, otherwise he'll be another flashy player who can't do much else. His skills and game sense are terrific, but his speed, contested skills and especially his defensive efforts which often leave a lot to be desired (and have for his entire time at the club).

                          Hill, for all the talk of him being "soft" is one of our hardest working defensive players. He lacks the physical side to his game, but that is fine. I'd like to see him put his body on the line more often, but some players just aren't going to win contested ball time and time again, and he is one of them. We know he contests very hard aerially, that takes courage. He also chases harder than just about any other forward we have.

                          If we are expecting him to play the role of an inside mid, sure, punish him for not winning contested ball. The fact is we aren't. He has a defined role in the side, and I think he plays it pretty well.

                          Without Hill, our F50 pressure would be absolutely stuffed!
                          Excellent post Griffen#16, sums up my thoughts too.
                          The curse is dead.

                          Comment

                          • Sockeye Salmon
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 6365

                            #178
                            Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                            Originally posted by Before I Die
                            I really don't think he needs any excuses. He played 24 out of 25 last year and kicked 33 goals, ranked 4th in the club. He has played a total of 43 games, has all the tools and will most likely be a 200 game player. Quite possibly an absolute champion. Consistency and hardness will come with maturity.

                            Born on 19/1/89, he is slightly younger than Everitt (13/3/89, 25 games) and more than a year younger Harbrow (18/2/88, 49 games) and Stack (26/5/88, 3 games) who were all recruited the same year as him.

                            We are also likely to lose Akermanis, Eagleton and Johnson next year and Hahn will be turning 30.

                            Yes, he didn't have a great game on Sunday and yes, he can look a little soft at times. But it is not a make or break year for him. He has made it already and he will be very important to our team in the very near future if not already now.
                            Johnson is on the vets list so he doesn't count.

                            Moles will be elevated, taking up a spot.

                            Liberatore and Wallis will take up 2 more spots.

                            Another couple will have to go, and Hill would be one under consideration (obviously trade rather than delisting).

                            Comment

                            • Go_Dogs
                              Hall of Fame
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 10252

                              #179
                              Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                              Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                              Another couple will have to go, and Hill would be one under consideration (obviously trade rather than delisting).
                              There will be a few in front of him though, imo.
                              Have you heard Butters wants to come to the Dogs?

                              Comment

                              • LostDoggy
                                WOOF Member
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 8307

                                #180
                                Re: Game Day - R1 Western Bulldogs vs Collingwood

                                On another note I think Eade shoul give Harbrow a run in the forward pocket this week. As we need a small fast forward to pick up the
                                crumbs in the games we are lacking hitting targets or just being dominated.

                                Comment

                                Working...