2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Thanks for clarifying that Bulldogsman.No they don't need to give up anything. They have the option of keeping them or trading them but they only have the rights to 2 of them (most likely Anderson and Jake Neade). GC also has the rights to two QLD players and can do likewise.
I think he's worth that and I hope we get him.
The GWS and Gold Coast concessions were far more substantial than I realised. They seem never-ending and to be at no cost to the expansion teams.
It's hard to watch expansion clubs win premierships and get incredible concessions, while we go through another rebuild with no help at all from anybody (including our own players. Thanks Ward, Harbrow and Lake.)Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
So are we interested in Lachlan Plowman, Lachie Whitfield, Oliver Wines, Jimmy Toumpas, Ben Kennedy and Jake Stringer.
Pick 5 for Toumpas
Pick 6 for Whitfield
pick 21 for Wines
pick 41 for StringerDon't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Do you think Stringer will still be around at pick 41?FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Sorry, but I don't think any of that will happen hotdog. I think Whitfield and Toumpas will be gone at picks 1 & 2. Wines top 10 or just outside. Stringer will go 1st round, I think maybe outside the top 10.Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Would you hazard a guess as to who we should select at 5 and 6?Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Bugger! just trying to see something positive out of a gloomy day.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
I don't think his commitment is a problem, I can't be sure on that though. There's some concerns on his behaviour, but mjp mentioned it's not that bad and Garlett's been pretty honest about it in the media. Given his talent, I think he's worth the small risk involved.Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
With Lake gone I think we'll take Plowman/O'Rourke on talent and Mayes will fall to Port which they'll love. We'll get some good players but I don't see our midfield speed getting fixed with the early picks which I had hoped for in Martin. Still should be solid but GC and GWS will own the flag for 10 years the way they've been set up. Their salary caps are the only things that may save everyone else long term. GrrrrrrrrrComment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Commitment issues arose from missing AIS sessions by sleeping in I think. All seems to be behind him now anyway - it seems it was a wake up call and he listened and responded the right way.I don't think his commitment is a problem, I can't be sure on that though. There's some concerns on his behaviour, but mjp mentioned it's not that bad and Garlett's been pretty honest about it in the media. Given his talent, I think he's worth the small risk involved.Comment
-
Re: 2012 Draft - Who do you like?
Plowman's rebound work has been talked up by more than a few talent-watchers.
If we have two bigger guys playing with Plowman playing a more rebound role with Wood & JJ, we may actually be developing a defensive unit capable of rebounding the ball beyond a strategy of "get it to Murphy".Western Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
Comment