Psd

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boydogs
    WOOF Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 5844

    #91
    Re: Psd

    Originally posted by Twodogs
    Ben Hudson.
    Lol! That would be hilarious!
    Do you know something, or just being absurd?

    I don't know why Tippett isn't being mentioned more, if GWS don't take him we have a pick before Sydney does. Maybe he's the 5th player.
    If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

    Formerly gogriff

    Comment

    • bulldogtragic
      The List Manager
      • Jan 2007
      • 34289

      #92
      Re: Psd

      Originally posted by gogriff
      Lol! That would be hilarious!
      Do you know something, or just being absurd?

      I don't know why Tippett isn't being mentioned more, if GWS don't take him we have a pick before Sydney does. Maybe he's the 5th player.
      Or he costs too much.
      Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

      Comment

      • G-Mo77
        Bulldog Team of the Century
        • Apr 2007
        • 9876

        #93
        Re: Psd

        Originally posted by LongWait
        My mail is we've told Lower we'll select him in the PSD, so he'd therefore be on our main list. Lower prefers us over remaining at Freo is what I've been told.
        Good mail then.

        I'm really happy to get Lower.

        Comment

        • boydogs
          WOOF Member
          • Apr 2009
          • 5844

          #94
          Re: Psd

          Originally posted by bulldogtragic
          Or he costs too much.
          Too much for the cap? Or too much as in not worth it?
          If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

          Formerly gogriff

          Comment

          • azabob
            Hall of Fame
            • Sep 2008
            • 15320

            #95
            Re: Psd

            Originally posted by G-Mo77
            http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsartic...7/default.aspx

            No talk of a rookie upgrade now so it looks like it's going to be 2 out of these 4 players.

            Nick Lower
            Matthew Bate

            Ben Duscher
            Brett Goodes

            I think they'll go with the bolded. If Goodes was around 25 - 26 he'd be my first choice.
            I think Ben Duscher has a connection to Shannon Grant? If he does he would have a good shot at it also. Nice size, right age and has good disposal.
            More of an In Bruges guy?

            Comment

            • Eastdog
              WOOF Communtiy Organiser
              • Feb 2012
              • 18292

              #96
              Re: Psd

              Originally posted by gogriff
              Lol! That would be hilarious!
              Do you know something, or just being absurd?

              I don't know why Tippett isn't being mentioned more, if GWS don't take him we have a pick before Sydney does. Maybe he's the 5th player.
              If we were back in the market to get Kurt Tippett who would we have to give up?
              "Footscray people are incredible people; so humble. I'm just so happy - ecstatic"

              Comment

              • soupman
                Bulldog Team of the Century
                • Nov 2007
                • 5113

                #97
                Re: Psd

                According to twitter an Irish bloke called Bill O'Carrol is training with us. Apparently just over 6 foot. International rookies don't take up normal spots do they so he could be a bonus rookie
                I should leave it alone but you're not right

                Comment

                • The Coon Dog
                  Bulldog Team of the Century
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 7579

                  #98
                  Re: Psd

                  Originally posted by Eastdog
                  If we were back in the market to get Kurt Tippett who would we have to give up?
                  Here's one for those that understand next years draft a bit.

                  Can we take Tippet in the PSD (I understand he'll nominate terms, so that may be an issue re: tenure), & then trade him to Sydney at next years trade week for their first round selection?

                  Costs us a bit in salary (could be a problem), might cause disquiet with existing players (could be a major problem), feels kind of dirty (perception could be a problem), he could get concussed (could be a problem) & he has an awful return after round 11 so Sydney (& anyone else may not part with a first round pick).

                  Those are the negatives as I see them & that alone is enough for me to have NO part whatsoever, but is there anyone that would perhaps consider it if it meant 2 picks in round one in an uncompromised draft in 2013?
                  [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                  Comment

                  • Maddog37
                    WOOF Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 3132

                    #99
                    Re: Psd

                    Not for me CD as the risk of more concussion may well render him valueless.

                    Comment

                    • chef
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 14624

                      Re: Psd

                      Yeah, I think we should stay away.
                      The curse is dead.

                      Comment

                      • bulldogtragic
                        The List Manager
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 34289

                        Re: Psd

                        Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                        Here's one for those that understand next years draft a bit.

                        Can we take Tippet in the PSD (I understand he'll nominate terms, so that may be an issue re: tenure), & then trade him to Sydney at next years trade week for their first round selection?

                        Costs us a bit in salary (could be a problem), might cause disquiet with existing players (could be a major problem), feels kind of dirty (perception could be a problem), he could get concussed (could be a problem) & he has an awful return after round 11 so Sydney (& anyone else may not part with a first round pick).

                        Those are the negatives as I see them & that alone is enough for me to have NO part whatsoever, but is there anyone that would perhaps consider it if it meant 2 picks in round one in an uncompromised draft in 2013?
                        Smells a little like the Veale deal to me, but I like your creativity.
                        Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                        Comment

                        • mjp
                          Bulldog Team of the Century
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 7366

                          Re: Psd

                          In theory we could.

                          Would be a VERY expensive first round pick though, particularly if the Swans finish up near the top again...pay an extra $1mill in salary for the 18th pick in the draft seems like a high price.
                          What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

                          Comment

                          • LostDoggy
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 8307

                            Re: Psd

                            Originally posted by mjp
                            In theory we could.

                            Would be a VERY expensive first round pick though, particularly if the Swans finish up near the top again...pay an extra $1mill in salary for the 18th pick in the draft seems like a high price.
                            I think the question should be does he have no interest in coming to Melbourne? We've had 2 good power forwards (that we've recruited under 30 years of age) in the past 30 years and here is one that will only cost a pre season pick. Sure he'll take up cap space but we should be well placed to absorb his salary.

                            Comment

                            • bulldogtragic
                              The List Manager
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 34289

                              Re: Psd

                              Not sure where we will find a spare million per annum.
                              Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                              Comment

                              • BulldogBelle
                                WOOF Member
                                • Nov 2006
                                • 5284

                                Re: Psd

                                Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                                Not sure where we will find a spare million per annum.
                                We're probably struggling to hit minimum salary cap expenditure!

                                Comment

                                Working...