Re: Did we waste Draft Picks by picking Rejects from other clubs?
Does/should this change anything with the overall judgement on his recruitment?
If it was the opposite, and a gun long term recruit had started off with 4 really poor games, those early games would be considered largely irrelevant wouldn't they?
Bandy, Sherman, Rawlings, they were all the beez neez four rounds into their careers with us as well. End of the day, it counted for nothing.
Players and list management decisions should really be rated on their entire career with the club and the opportunity cost.
You take into account the total contribution of a player (great/good/poor quality games, output, standing up when it counts, agreeability), and weigh it up against total cost (salary, spot on the list, footy department spend allocated to them, game time in the seniors which, if they're delisted within 20 games or 12/24 months, could be considered a waste given that might have been better to invest that experience into younger players who will be around for a flag tilt in a few years time, trade cost - who would have been picked up in their place if they weren't acquired).
Given that cost, the most important question you ask, would you do it again.
Despite their being too many recycled/fringe bulldogs pick ups to list, there are not many where the answer to that question is a yes.
Does/should this change anything with the overall judgement on his recruitment?
If it was the opposite, and a gun long term recruit had started off with 4 really poor games, those early games would be considered largely irrelevant wouldn't they?
Bandy, Sherman, Rawlings, they were all the beez neez four rounds into their careers with us as well. End of the day, it counted for nothing.
Players and list management decisions should really be rated on their entire career with the club and the opportunity cost.
You take into account the total contribution of a player (great/good/poor quality games, output, standing up when it counts, agreeability), and weigh it up against total cost (salary, spot on the list, footy department spend allocated to them, game time in the seniors which, if they're delisted within 20 games or 12/24 months, could be considered a waste given that might have been better to invest that experience into younger players who will be around for a flag tilt in a few years time, trade cost - who would have been picked up in their place if they weren't acquired).
Given that cost, the most important question you ask, would you do it again.
Despite their being too many recycled/fringe bulldogs pick ups to list, there are not many where the answer to that question is a yes.
Comment