The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 Good win by the Aussies, the jumping at shadows by the media and some on here to be honest was a little over the top. We had plenty of runs on the board and freshened up our bowling attack to take 10 wickets. The only mistake made by either captain was made at the toss and it will haunt Root for a long time."Loves a scrap....oh yeah & he's a pretty handy footballer as well"Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 Gaffney had a shocker but it can't be much fun with the intense scrutiny of every decision an umpire makes. They banged on about some umpiring decisions overs after they happened showing slo mo replays and pointing out the mistake yet again. But they didn't go into Roots decision to send Australia in much at all.Hopefully Eramasmus gets back on field next test with Dar. I'm not sure Gaffney can explain his horrible performance.
 
 With the DRS now and scrutiny from TV coverage, and England & Australia having a few good umpires, I think the debate can perhaps start about the best umpires getting the best games irrespective of the teams playing. Sure it was out of hand when the ICC implemented the policy, but I'm comfortable enough with someone like Nigel Llong from the England umpiring this series. How many years did Simon Taufell go without making a single bad decision and we couldn't get him in our tests, despite having some of the highest profile tests the best umpires should be umpiring.
 
 Agree. He was getting into position quickly.They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 So Mitch Marsh comes into the 12 at the expense of Chadd Sayers. It certainly signals that Peter Handscomb is under review as the selectors look towards easing the burden on our 4 strike bowlersWestern Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 Smith has been given a leave pass by the fact that his batsmen didn't support him in the 3rd innings. Couldn't exactly the same thing be said of the bowlers for Root in the 1st innings? They bowled like shit in very seam friendly conditions and let Australia get off the chain, which ultimately proved very decisive."Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 I must have watched a different first day. No doubt the English bowled too short but I dispute that the deck was seam friendly on day 1. It looked like a great deck to bat on and the Aussies took full advantageSmith has been given a leave pass by the fact that his batsmen didn't support him in the 3rd innings. Couldn't exactly the same thing be said of the bowlers for Root in the 1st innings? They bowled like shit in very seam friendly conditions and let Australia get off the chain, which ultimately proved very decisive."Loves a scrap....oh yeah & he's a pretty handy footballer as well"Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 It looked like a good deck to bat because the English bowlers were off in all facets in the first innings - they lacked energy & pace, their length in particular was all wrong and their plans were not consistently followed. Everything they did perfectly in the 2nd innings (when the horse has almost bolted) they failed to do on day 1 in the 1st innings - I reckon a strong effort with the ball on day 1 could have chopped 200 odd runs off Australia's first innings and the complexion of the game would have changed."Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 We might have knocked off a few in the night session and followed up the next day and not needed to bat again, but we didn't exactly tear them apart last night, and there's every chance we could've been chasing a small total in the night session and lost. IMO it wasn't the play to make and am happy with how we played it. I would've of course have preferred to bat better in the second innings, but we know how brittle our batting line up is, it's just fortunate England's is just as bad and our bowlers are better.We'll see how it goes. I definitely understand not wanting to have to bat in the evening with a small target to chase, I just though England were completely cooked after their innings and would have been really easy to knock over.
 
 Hopefully the ball has some zip in the night session, and isn't too worn.[COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Western Bulldogs:[/B][/COLOR] [COLOR="#0000CD"][B]We exist to win premierships[/B][/COLOR]Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 Us having a late fourth/fifth day run chase would have been the worst of all outcomes. I'm annoyed we didn't enforce the follow on but I can see the reasoning behind it.They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 The ball was 40 odd overs old last night whereas we would have had a brand new pink cherry if we enforced the follow-on the previous evening. This England team are a truly putrid batting line-up - only Root (who has a major problem not being able to go on with starts) and Stoneman have shown anything resembling backbone. They would have been lambs to the laughter against our world class bowling attack with a new ball at night.
 
 Still, the end justifies the means - it was a very comfortable win in the end. Our bowlers are so good they can keep us in almost any game regardless of our batting foibles."Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 Stokes would have been handy in the middle order.The ball was 40 odd overs old last night whereas we would have had a brand new pink cherry if we enforced the follow-on the previous evening. This England team are a truly putrid batting line-up - only Root (who has a major problem not being able to go on with starts) and Stoneman have shown anything resembling backbone. They would have been lambs to the laughter against our world class bowling attack with a new ball at night.
 
 Still, the end justifies the means - it was a very comfortable win in the end. Our bowlers are so good they can keep us in almost any game regardless of our batting foibles.FFC: Established 1883
 
 Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 It turned out OK, and was a decent enough and understandable call. Our batting lineup is brittle when tested under extreme pressure, which on the flip-side to what we decided to do after our first dig, seemed strange given we exposed ourselves to a new ball and adverse batting conditions up front when England put a poor batting performance together.We might have knocked off a few in the night session and followed up the next day and not needed to bat again, but we didn't exactly tear them apart last night, and there's every chance we could've been chasing a small total in the night session and lost. IMO it wasn't the play to make and am happy with how we played it. I would've of course have preferred to bat better in the second innings, but we know how brittle our batting line up is, it's just fortunate England's is just as bad and our bowlers are better.
 
 To me it seemed extremely bullish in light of our bowling being our strength and batting a bit of a weakness. I get the bowlers may have been tired and in need of management, but if I wanted to get a quick result to demoralise England it would have been through putting them in again.
 
 It's almost as if our batting is without purpose unless the situation is direly obvious to them. The only task was to get through Monday night and hold firm until Tuesday evening, but we put in a lazy performance.
 
 We can argue which situation would have been better for us to work through, but 138 was bloody pathetic and put us at unnecessary risk of losing the game with a new ball and potential for it to move around wasted Tuesday night.TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
- 
	
	
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
 Re: The Ashes: 2nd Test - December 2nd 2017 - Adelaide
 
 We bowled England out for 233, and we were about 213 in front on the first innings - forget about Australia chasing 150 odd in the 4th innings, England would have been lucky to reach 100 batting under lights against the new ball."Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"Comment
Comment